From the lab to the dorm room: metacognitive awareness and use of spaced study

Laboratory studies have demonstrated the long-term memory benefits of studying material in multiple distributed sessions as opposed to one massed session, given an identical amount of overall study time (i.e., the spacing effect). The current study goes beyond the laboratory to investigate whether undergraduates know about the advantage of spaced study, to what extent they use it in their own studying, and what factors might influence its utilization. Results from a web-based survey indicated that participants (n = 285) were aware of the benefits of spaced study and would use a higher level of spacing under ideal compared to realistic circumstances. However, self-reported use of spacing was intermediate, similar to massing and several other study strategies, and ranked well below commonly used strategies such as rereading notes. Several factors were endorsed as important in the decision to distribute study time, including the perceived difficulty of an upcoming exam, the amount of material to learn, how heavily an exam is weighed in the course grade, and the value of the material. Further, level of metacognitive self-regulation and use of elaboration strategies were associated with higher rates of spaced study. Additional research is needed to examine student study habits in a naturalistic setting, and to explore effective ways to encourage behavior change through motivational and teaching techniques.

[1]  John A. Glover,et al.  Massed versus distributed repeated reading: A case of forgetting helping recall? , 1990 .

[2]  Mark A. McDaniel,et al.  The Limited Benefits of Rereading Educational Texts. , 2009 .

[3]  College Students’ Beliefs about Exam Preparation , 1997 .

[4]  Jeffrey D. Karpicke,et al.  Metacognitive strategies in student learning: Do students practise retrieval when they study on their own? , 2009, Memory.

[5]  Robert A. Bjork,et al.  The promise and perils of self-regulated study , 2007, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[6]  Thomas C. Toppino,et al.  Metacognitive control over the distribution of practice: when is spacing preferred? , 2009, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[7]  A. Glenberg,et al.  Component-levels theory of the effects of spacing of repetitions on recall and recognition , 1979, Memory & cognition.

[8]  John Dunlosky,et al.  Toward an understanding of students’ allocation of study time: Why do they decide to mass or space their practice? , 2010, Memory & cognition.

[9]  W. Balch.  Encouraging Distributed Study : A Classroom Experiment on the Spacing Effect , 2006 .

[10]  H. Pashler,et al.  Increasing Retention Without Increasing Study Time , 2007 .

[11]  R. Bjork,et al.  Learning Concepts and Categories: Is Spacing the “Enemy of Induction”? , 2008 .

[12]  A. Koriat.  Monitoring one's own knowledge during study : A cue-utilization approach to judgments of learning , 1997 .

[13]  J. Dunlosky,et al.  Fluency of retrieval at study affects judgments of learning (JOLs): An analytic or nonanalytic basis for JOLs? , 2001, Memory & cognition.

[14]  Hermann Ebbinghaus (1885).  Memory: A Contribution to Experimental Psychology , 2013, Annals of Neurosciences.

[15]  Aaron S. Benjamin,et al.  Metacognitive control of the spacing of study repetitions , 2006 .

[16]  R. Bjork.  Memory and metamemory considerations in the training of human beings. , 1994 .

[17]  Bruce C. Howard,et al.  Metacognition and Self-Regulated Learning Constructs , 2004 .

[18]  P. Pintrich.  A Manual for the Use of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ). , 1991 .

[19]  Kelli M Taylor,et al.  The effects of overlearning and distributed practise on the retention of mathematics knowledge , 2006 .

[20]  H. Pashler,et al.  Distributed practice in verbal recall tasks: A review and quantitative synthesis. , 2006, Psychological bulletin.

[21]  D. Halpern.  Teaching critical thinking for transfer across domains. , 1998 .

[22]  J. McCabe.  Metacognitive awareness of learning strategies in undergraduates , 2011, Memory & cognition.

[23]  J. Metcalfe,et al.  Metacognition : knowing about knowing , 1994 .

[24]  D. Halpern.  Teaching critical thinking for transfer across domains. Dispositions, skills, structure training, and metacognitive monitoring. , 1998, The American psychologist.

[25]  Nate Kornell,et al.  Optimising Learning Using Flashcards: Spacing Is More Effective Than Cramming , 2009 .

[26]  Lisa K. Son,et al.  Spacing one's study: evidence for a metacognitive control strategy. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[27]  C. Wolters,et al.  Regulation of Motivation: Evaluating an Underemphasized Aspect of Self-Regulated Learning , 2003 .

[28]  F. N. Dempster,et al.  The spacing effect: A case study in the failure to apply the results of psychological research. , 1988 .

[29]  Nate Kornell,et al.  Simultaneous decisions at study: time allocation, ordering, and spacing , 2009 .

[30]  L. Jacoby,et al.  When forgetting helps memory: an analysis of repetition effects , 1982 .

[31]  N. Schwarz.  Self-reports: How the questions shape the answers. , 1999 .

[32]  Jeffrey D. Karpicke,et al.  Metacognitive control and strategy selection: deciding to practice retrieval during learning. , 2009, Journal of experimental psychology. General.