Assessing patient preferences for the delivery of different community‐based models of care using a discrete choice experiment

To assess patient preferences for different models of care defined by location of care, frequency of care and principal carer within community‐based health‐care services for older people.

[1]  M. Buxton,et al.  Women and health care professionals' preferences for Down's Syndrome screening tests: a conjoint analysis study , 2004, BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[2]  M Ryan,et al.  Using conjoint analysis to elicit preferences for health care , 2000, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[3]  J. Lauridsen,et al.  Eliciting women's preferences for a training program in breast self-examination: a conjoint ranking experiment. , 2005, Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research.

[4]  S. Nancarrow,et al.  Understanding service context: development of a service pro forma to describe and measure elderly peoples' community and intermediate care services. , 2009, Health & social care in the community.

[5]  S. Dixon,et al.  The relationship between staff skill mix, costs and outcomes in intermediate care services , 2010, BMC health services research.

[6]  S. Nancarrow,et al.  The introduction and evaluation of an occupational therapy assistant practitioner , 2005 .

[7]  S. Dixon,et al.  The relationship between workforce flexibility and the costs and outcomes of older peoples services , 2010 .

[8]  John Adams,et al.  Dynamic role boundaries in intermediate care services. , 2004, Nursing older people.

[9]  G. Martin,et al.  Diversity in intermediate care. , 2004, Health & social care in the community.

[10]  B. Tennison,et al.  Commission for Healthcare Audit and Inspection , 2004 .

[11]  F. Sassi,et al.  Conjoint analysis of preferences for cardiac risk assessment in primary care , 2005, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care.

[12]  M. Elliott,et al.  Health and social care in the community. , 1989, Elderly care.

[13]  B. Ställberg,et al.  Asthma Treatment Preference Study: A Conjoint Analysis of Preferred Drug Treatments , 2004 .

[14]  P. Enderby,et al.  What is Intermediate Care? Looking at Needs , 2000 .

[15]  S. Nancarrow The impact of intermediate care services on job satisfaction, skills and career development opportunities. , 2007, Journal of clinical nursing.

[16]  S. Dixon,et al.  Looking inside the black box of community rehabilitation and intermediate care teams in the United Kingdom: an audit of service and staffing. , 2009, Quality in primary care.

[17]  P. Dolan,et al.  Modeling valuations for EuroQol health states. , 1997, Medical care.

[18]  J. Ratcliffe THE USE OF CONJOINT ANALYSIS TO ELICIT WILLINGNESS-TO-PAY VALUES , 2000, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care.

[19]  B. Ställberg,et al.  Asthma treatment preference study: a conjoint analysis of preferred drug treatments. , 2003, Chest.

[20]  Jordan J. Louviere,et al.  Quick and easy choice sets: Constructing optimal and nearly optimal stated choice experiments , 2005 .

[21]  Anna Moran,et al.  Assisting role redesign: a qualitative evaluation of the implementation of a podiatry assistant role to a community health setting utilising a traineeship approach , 2012, Journal of Foot and Ankle Research.

[22]  G. Larkin,et al.  Occupational Monopoly and Modern Medicine , 1983 .

[23]  A. Foss,et al.  Views of older people on cataract surgery options: an assessment of preferences by conjoint analysis , 2003, Quality & safety in health care.