On optimal retreat distance for the equivalent source method-based nearfield acoustical holography.

As a basic form of the equivalent source method (ESM) that is used to nearfield acoustical holography (NAH) problems, discrete monopoles are utilized to represent the sound field of interest. When setting up the virtual source distribution, it is vital to maintain a "retreat distance" between the virtual sources and the actual source surface such that reconstruction would not suffer from singularity problems. However, one cannot increase the distance without bound because of the ill-posedness inherent in the reconstruction process with large distance. In prior research, 1-2 times lattice spacing, or the inter-element distance of microphones, is generally recommended as retreat distance in using the ESM-based NAH. While this rule has shown to yield good results in many cases, the optimal choice is a complicated issue that depends on frequency, geometry of the physical source, content of evanescent waves, distribution of sensors and virtual sources, etc. This paper deals about attaining the best compromise between the reconstruction errors induced by the point source singularity; the reconstruction ill-posedness is an interesting problem in its own right. The paper revisits this issue, with the aid of an optimization algorithm based on the golden section search and parabolic interpolation. Numerical simulations were conducted for a baffled planar piston source and a spherically baffled piston source. The results revealed that the retreat distance appropriate for the ESM ranged from 0.4 to 0.5 times the spacing for the planar piston, while from 0.8 to 1.7 times average spacing for the spherical piston. Experiments carried out for a vibrating aluminum plate also revealed that the retreat distance with 0.5 times the spacing yielded better reconstructed velocity than those with 1/20 and 1 times the spacing.

[1]  Earl G Williams,et al.  Study of the comparison of the methods of equivalent sources and boundary element methods for near-field acoustic holography. , 2006, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[2]  Zhang,et al.  A computational acoustic field reconstruction process based on an indirect boundary element formulation , 2000, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[3]  Jeong-Guon Ih,et al.  On the holographic reconstruction of vibroacoustic fields using equivalent sources and inverse boundary element method , 2005 .

[4]  Per Christian Hansen,et al.  Sound source reconstruction using inverse boundary element calculations. , 2003, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[5]  Bo-Ha Lee,et al.  3-D sound source reconstruction and field reprediction using the Helmholtz integral equation , 1990 .

[6]  Julian D. Maynard,et al.  Holographic Imaging without the Wavelength Resolution Limit , 1980 .

[7]  Sean F. Wu,et al.  Helmholtz equation-least-squares method for reconstructing the acoustic pressure field , 1997 .

[8]  Julian D. Maynard,et al.  Sound source reconstructions using a microphone array , 1980 .

[9]  Wu On reconstruction of acoustic pressure fields using the Helmholtz equation least squares method , 2000, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[10]  Jia-Hong Lin,et al.  Source identification system based on the time-domain nearfield equivalence source imaging: Fundamental theory and implementation , 2007 .

[11]  Finn Jacobsen,et al.  On the applicability of the spherical wave expansion with a single origin for near-field acoustical holography. , 2009, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[12]  J. B. Fahnline,et al.  A numerical solution for the general radiation problem based on the combined methods of superposition and singular‐value decomposition , 1991 .

[13]  B H Houston,et al.  Interior near-field acoustical holography in flight. , 2000, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[14]  Angie Sarkissian,et al.  Extension of measurement surface in near-field acoustic holography , 2004 .

[15]  Mingsian R. Bai,et al.  Application of BEM (boundary element method)‐based acoustic holography to radiation analysis of sound sources with arbitrarily shaped geometries , 1992 .

[16]  Zhidong Zhang,et al.  A Source Reconstruction Process Based on an Indirect Variational Boundary Element Formulation , 2000, Noise Control and Acoustics.

[17]  Earl G. Williams Chapter 5 – The Inverse Problem: Cylindrical NAH , 1999 .

[18]  J. B. Fahnline,et al.  Numerical errors associated with the method of superposition for computing acoustic fields , 1991 .

[19]  J. B. Fahnline,et al.  A method for computing acoustic fields based on the principle of wave superposition , 1989 .

[20]  Sean F. Wu,et al.  Visualization of vehicle interior sound field using nearfield acoustical holography based on the helmholtz-equation least-squares (HELS) method , 2005 .

[21]  Angie Sarkissian,et al.  Method of superposition applied to patch near-field acoustic holography , 2005 .

[22]  Unto K. Laine,et al.  Splitting the unit delay [FIR/all pass filters design] , 1996, IEEE Signal Process. Mag..