Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the lumbar spine in people without back pain

BACKGROUND The relation between abnormalities in the lumbar spine and low back pain is controversial. We examined the prevalence of abnormal findings on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans of the lumbar spine in people without back pain. METHODS We performed MRI examinations on 98 asymptomatic people. The scans were read independently by two neuroradiologists who did not know the clinical status of the subjects. To reduce the possibility of bias in interpreting the studies, abnormal MRI scans from 27 people with back pain were mixed randomly with the scans from the asymptomatic people. We used the following standardized terms to classify the five intervertebral disks in the lumbosacral spine: normal, bulge (circumferential symmetric extension of the disk beyond the interspace), protrusion (focal or asymmetric extension of the disk beyond the interspace), and extrusion (more extreme extension of the disk beyond the interspace). Nonintervertebral disk abnormalities, such as facet arthropathy, were also documented. RESULTS Thirty-six percent of the 98 asymptomatic subjects had normal disks at all levels. With the results of the two readings averaged, 52 percent of the subjects had a bulge at at least one level, 27 percent had a protrusion, and 1 percent had an extrusion. Thirty-eight percent had an abnormality of more than one intervertebral disk. The prevalence of bulges, but not of protrusions, increased with age. The most common nonintervertebral disk abnormalities were Schmorl's nodes (herniation of the disk into the vertebral-body end plate), found in 19 percent of the subjects; annular defects (disruption of the outer fibrous ring of the disk), in 14 percent; and facet arthropathy (degenerative disease of the posterior articular processes of the vertebrae), in 8 percent. The findings were similar in men and women. CONCLUSIONS On MRI examination of the lumbar spine, many people without back pain have disk bulges or protrusions but not extrusions. Given the high prevalence of these findings and of back pain, the discovery by MRI of bulges or protrusions in people with low back pain may frequently be coincidental.

[1]  C HIRSCH,et al.  Studies on structural changes in the lumbar annulus fibrosus. , 1952, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica.

[2]  D. L. Mcrae Asymptomatic Intervertebral Disc Protrusions , 1956 .

[3]  W. Hitselberger,et al.  Abnormal myelograms in asymptomatic patients. , 1968, Journal of neurosurgery.

[4]  J. R. Landis,et al.  The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. , 1977, Biometrics.

[5]  Pritzker Kp Aging and degeneration in the lumbar intervertebral disc. , 1977 .

[6]  C. Helms CT of the lumbar spine--stenosis and arthrosis. , 1982, Computerized radiology : official journal of the Computerized Tomography Society.

[7]  N. Patronas,et al.  A study of computer-assisted tomography. I. The incidence of positive CAT scans in an asymptomatic group of patients. , 1984, Spine.

[8]  M. C. Powell,et al.  PREVALENCE OF LUMBAR DISC DEGENERATION OBSERVED BY MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN SYMPTOMLESS WOMEN , 1986, The Lancet.

[9]  R. Deyo,et al.  Descriptive Epidemiology of Low‐back Pain and Its Related Medical Care in the United States , 1987, Spine.

[10]  P. Hudkins,et al.  The Inflammatory Effect of Nucleus Pulposus: A Possible Element in the Pathogenesis of Low-back Pain , 1987, Spine.

[11]  V. Haughton,et al.  Tears of the anulus fibrosus: correlation between MR and pathologic findings in cadavers. , 1988, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[12]  Prevalence of lumbosacral intervertebral disk abnormalities on MR images in pregnant and asymptomatic nonpregnant women , 1989 .

[13]  V. Haughton,et al.  Criteria for classifying normal and degenerated lumbar intervertebral disks. , 1989, Radiology.

[14]  Nicholas,et al.  Abnormal magnetic-resonance scans of the lumbar spine in asymptomatic subjects. A prospective investigation. , 1990, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[15]  J. Robertson,et al.  The rape of the spine. , 1993, Surgical neurology.

[16]  R. Deyo,et al.  Physician variation in diagnostic testing for low back pain. Who you see is what you get. , 1994, Arthritis and rheumatism.