MIRASS: Medical Informatics Research Activity Support System Using Information Mashup Network

The advancement of information technology has facilitated the automation and feasibility of online information sharing. The second generation of the World Wide Web (Web 2.0) enables the collaboration and sharing of online information through Web-serving applications. Data mashup, which is considered a Web 2.0 platform, plays an important role in information and communication technology applications. However, few ideas have been transformed into education and research domains, particularly in medical informatics. The creation of a friendly environment for medical informatics research requires the removal of certain obstacles in terms of search time, resource credibility, and search result accuracy. This paper considers three glitches that researchers encounter in medical informatics research; these glitches include the quality of papers obtained from scientific search engines (particularly, Web of Science and Science Direct), the quality of articles from the indices of these search engines, and the customizability and flexibility of these search engines. A customizable search engine for trusted resources of medical informatics was developed and implemented through data mashup. Results show that the proposed search engine improves the usability of scientific search engines for medical informatics. Pipe search engine was found to be more efficient than other engines.

[1]  Jeffrey Wong,et al.  Making mashups with marmite: towards end-user programming for the web , 2007, CHI.

[2]  Joel J. P. C. Rodrigues,et al.  How to Measure the QoS of a Web-based EHRs System: Development of an Instrument , 2012, Journal of Medical Systems.

[3]  Alan Oxley,et al.  Proposed development methodology for higher education and library mash-ups , 2010, 2010 International Symposium on Information Technology.

[4]  E. Seydel,et al.  Evaluation of Internet-Based Technology for Supporting Self-Care: Problems Encountered by Patients and Caregivers When Using Self-Care Applications , 2008, Journal of medical Internet research.

[5]  Fabio Casati,et al.  Understanding Mashup Development , 2008, IEEE Internet Computing.

[6]  Rabiu Ibrahim The Potential for Using Mash-Ups at a Higher Education , 2012 .

[7]  Eyas El-Qawasmeh,et al.  Software Engineering and Computer Systems - Second International Conference, ICSECS 2011, Kuantan, Pahang, Malaysia, June 27-29, 2011, Proceedings, Part I , 2011, ICSECS.

[8]  Alan Oxley,et al.  Assessing the Use of Mash-Ups in Higher Education , 2011, ICSECS 2011.

[9]  J. Wareham,et al.  Health 2.0 and Medicine 2.0: Tensions and Controversies in the Field , 2008, Journal of medical Internet research.

[10]  Samantha A. Adams,et al.  Revisiting the online health information reliability debate in the wake of "web 2.0": An inter-disciplinary literature and website review , 2010, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[11]  Sean A. Munson,et al.  Social Participation in Health 2.0 , 2010, Computer.

[12]  Jonathan Wareham,et al.  Junior physician's use of Web 2.0 for information seeking and medical education: A qualitative study , 2009, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[13]  Jason Hong,et al.  What do we , 2008, WEUSE@ICSE.

[14]  Mark Chignell,et al.  The Smart Internet - Current Research and Future Applications , 2010, The Smart Internet.

[15]  R. Ibrahim Framework and model design for higher education Mash-ups , 2012, 2012 International Conference on Computer & Information Science (ICCIS).

[16]  G. Eysenbach Medicine 2.0: Social Networking, Collaboration, Participation, Apomediation, and Openness , 2008, Journal of medical Internet research.

[17]  Filip De Turck,et al.  COSARA: Integrated Service Platform for Infection Surveillance and Antibiotic Management in the ICU , 2012, Journal of Medical Systems.

[18]  Miri SeyyedMohammad,et al.  Indexing in ISI Web of Sciences: The Opportunities and Threats , 2012 .

[19]  Herbert Davies,et al.  Definition of Health , 1946 .

[20]  Margaret-Anne D. Storey,et al.  A Survey of Mashup Development Environments , 2010, The Smart Internet.

[21]  L. Engelen,et al.  Definition of Health 2.0 and Medicine 2.0: A Systematic Review , 2010, Journal of medical Internet research.

[22]  Nicole Tourigny,et al.  Bio2RDF: Towards a mashup to build bioinformatics knowledge systems , 2008, J. Biomed. Informatics.

[23]  Tommi Mikkonen,et al.  Mashups - Software Ecosystems for the Web Era , 2012, IWSECO@ICSOB.

[24]  Dean Giustini,et al.  How Web 2.0 is changing medicine , 2006, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[25]  Sriram Subramanian,et al.  Talking about tactile experiences , 2013, CHI.

[26]  Luk Arbuckle,et al.  Two h-Index Benchmarks for Evaluating the Publication Performance of Medical Informatics Researchers , 2012, Journal of medical Internet research.

[27]  James Testa The Thomson Reuters Journal Selection Process , 2009 .

[28]  Varadraj P. Gurupur,et al.  C-PHIS: A Concept Map-Based Knowledge Base Framework to Develop Personal Health Information Systems , 2013, Journal of Medical Systems.

[29]  Christy Caldwell,et al.  Shifting Sands: Science Researchers on Google Scholar, Web of Science, and PubMed, with Implications for Library Collections Budgets. , 2010 .