Automated detection of microcalcification clusters for digital breast tomosynthesis using projection data only: a preliminary study.

Digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) is a promising modality for breast imaging in which an anisotropic volume image of the breast is obtained. We present an algorithm for computerized detection of microcalcification clusters (MCCs) for DBT. This algorithm operates on the projection views only. Therefore it does not depend on reconstruction, and is computationally efficient. The algorithm was developed using a database of 30 image sets with microcalcifications, and a control group of 30 image sets without visible findings. The patient data were acquired on the first DBT prototype at Massachusetts General Hospital. Algorithm sensitivity was estimated to be 0.86 at 1.3 false positive clusters, which is below that of current MCC detection algorithms for full-field digital mammography. Because of the small number of patient cases, algorithm parameters were not optimized and one linear classifier was used. An actual limitation of our approach may be that the signal-to-noise ratio in the projection images is too low for microcalcification detection. Furthermore, the database consisted of predominantly small MCC. This may be related to the image quality obtained with this first prototype.

[1]  Ping Lu,et al.  Computer-aided detection and diagnosis of masses and clustered microcalcifications from digital mammograms , 1993, Electronic Imaging.

[2]  Yulei Jiang.  A computer‐aided diagnostic scheme for classification of clustered microcalcifications in mammograms , 1999 .

[3]  Nico Karssemeijer,et al.  Noise equalization for detection of microcalcification clusters in direct digital mammogram images , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[4]  Elizabeth A Rafferty,et al.  Digital mammography: novel applications. , 2007, Radiologic clinics of North America.

[5]  Tao Wu,et al.  A comparison of reconstruction algorithms for breast tomosynthesis. , 2004, Medical physics.

[6]  James T Dobbins,et al.  Digital x-ray tomosynthesis: current state of the art and clinical potential. , 2003, Physics in medicine and biology.

[7]  R. Nishikawa,et al.  The use of a priori information in the detection of mammographic microcalcifications to improve their classification. , 2003, Medical physics.

[8]  F R Verdun,et al.  Estimation of the noisy component of anatomical backgrounds. , 1999, Medical physics.

[9]  Mari Varjonen,et al.  Clinical benefits of combined diagnostic three-dimensional digital breast tomosynthesis and ultrasound imaging , 2005, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[10]  Tao Wu,et al.  Lesion Visibility in Low Dose Tomosynthesis , 2006, Digital Mammography / IWDM.

[11]  Berkman Sahiner,et al.  Computer aided detection of clusters of microcalcifications on full field digital mammograms. , 2006, Medical physics.

[12]  Srinivasan Vedantham,et al.  Physical characteristics of a full-field digital mammography system , 2004 .

[13]  Joseph Y. Lo,et al.  Digital breast tomosynthesis using an amorphous selenium flat panel detector , 2005, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[14]  S Suryanarayanan,et al.  Full breast digital mammography with an amorphous silicon-based flat panel detector: physical characteristics of a clinical prototype. , 2000, Medical physics.

[15]  Heinz-Otto Peitgen,et al.  Scale-space signatures for the detection of clustered microcalcifications in digital mammograms , 1999, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[16]  D. Kopans,et al.  Voting strategy for artifact reduction in digital breast tomosynthesis. , 2006, Medical physics.

[17]  J W Wallis,et al.  Three-dimensional display in nuclear medicine. , 1989, IEEE transactions on medical imaging.

[18]  Thomas Mertelmeier,et al.  Optimizing filtered backprojection reconstruction for a breast tomosynthesis prototype device , 2006, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[19]  M. Giger,et al.  Computerized mass detection for digital breast tomosynthesis directly from the projection images. , 2006, Medical physics.

[20]  Aldo Badano,et al.  Anisotropic imaging performance in indirect x-ray imaging detectors. , 2006, Medical physics.

[21]  Berkman Sahiner,et al.  Stepwise linear discriminant analysis in computer-aided diagnosis: the effect of finite sample size , 1999, Medical Imaging.

[22]  Rebecca Fahrig,et al.  Optimization of a tomosynthesis system for the detection of lung nodules. , 2006, Medical physics.

[23]  A. Burgess,et al.  Human observer detection experiments with mammograms and power-law noise. , 2001, Medical physics.

[24]  Tor D Tosteson,et al.  Digital breast tomosynthesis: initial experience in 98 women with abnormal digital screening mammography. , 2007, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[25]  D. Kopans,et al.  Tomographic mammography using a limited number of low-dose cone-beam projection images. , 2003, Medical physics.

[26]  K Doi,et al.  Image feature analysis and computer-aided diagnosis in digital radiography. I. Automated detection of microcalcifications in mammography. , 1987, Medical physics.

[27]  Michael P. Kempston,et al.  Resolution at oblique incidence angles of a flat panel imager for breast tomosynthesis. , 2006, Medical physics.

[28]  Ian Shaw,et al.  Design and performance of the prototype full field breast tomosynthesis system with selenium based flat panel detector , 2005, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[29]  T. Freer,et al.  Screening mammography with computer-aided detection: prospective study of 12,860 patients in a community breast center. , 2001, Radiology.

[30]  Raffaella Rossi,et al.  Physical characteristics of GE Senographe Essential and DS digital mammography detectors. , 2008, Medical physics.

[31]  G Hermann,et al.  Occult malignant breast lesions in 114 patients: relationship to age and the presence of microcalcifications. , 1988, Radiology.

[32]  Aruna A. Vedula,et al.  A computer simulation study comparing lesion detection accuracy with digital mammography, breast tomosynthesis, and cone-beam CT breast imaging. , 2006, Medical physics.