Projections to the anterodorsal thalamus and lateral mammillary nuclei arise from different cell populations within the postsubiculum: Implications for the control of head direction cells

The neural representation of directional heading is encoded by a population of cells located in a circuit that includes the postsubiculum (PoS), anterodorsal thalamus (ADN), and lateral mammillary nuclei (LMN). Throughout this circuit, many cells rely on both movement‐ and landmark‐related information to discharge as a function of the animal's directional heading. The PoS projects to both the ADN and LMN, and these connections may convey critical spatial information about landmarks, because lesions of the PoS disrupt landmark control in head direction (HD) cells and hippocampal place cells [Goodridge and Taube ( 1997 ) J Neurosci 17:9315–9330; Calton et al. ( 2003 ) J Neurosci 23:9719–9731]. The PoS → ADN projection originates in the deep layers of PoS, but no studies have determined whether the PoS → LMN projection originates from the same cells that project to ADN. To address this issue, two distinct cholera toxin‐subunit B (CTB) fluorophore conjugates (Alexa Fluor 488 and Alexa Fluor 594) were injected into the LMN and ADN of the same rats, and PoS sections were examined for cell bodies containing either or both CTB conjugates. Results indicated that the PoS → LMN projection originates exclusively from a thin layer of cells located superficial to the layer(s) of PoS → ADN projection cells, with no overlap. To verify the laminar distribution and morphological characteristics of PoS → LMN and PoS → ADN cells, biotinylated dextran amine was injected into LMN or ADN of different rats, and tissue sections were counterstained with thionin. Results indicated that the PoS → LMN projection arises from large pyramidal cells in layer IV, whereas the PoS → ADN projection arises from a heterogeneous cell population in layers V/VI. This study provides the first evidence that the PoS → ADN and PoS → LMN projections arise from distinct, nonoverlapping cell layers in PoS. Functionally, the PoS may provide landmark information to HD cells in LMN. © 2010 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

[1]  J. Taube,et al.  Interaction between the Postsubiculum and Anterior Thalamus in the Generation of Head Direction Cell Activity , 1997, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[2]  Masahiko Takada,et al.  Topographical organization of subicular neurons projecting to subcortical regions , 1994, Brain Research Bulletin.

[3]  Xiao-Jing Wang,et al.  Angular Path Integration by Moving “Hill of Activity”: A Spiking Neuron Model without Recurrent Excitation of the Head-Direction System , 2005, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[4]  P. E. Sharp,et al.  Head direction, place, and movement correlates for cells in the rat retrosplenial cortex. , 2001, Behavioral neuroscience.

[5]  M. Petrides,et al.  Memory for Places and the Region of the Mamillary Bodies in Rats , 1990, The European journal of neuroscience.

[6]  T. Blackstad Commissural connections of the hippocampal region in the rat, with special reference to their mode of termination , 1956, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[7]  R U Muller,et al.  Head-direction cells recorded from the postsubiculum in freely moving rats. I. Description and quantitative analysis , 1990, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[8]  H. T. Blair,et al.  Role of the Lateral Mammillary Nucleus in the Rat Head Direction Circuit A Combined Single Unit Recording and Lesion Study , 1998, Neuron.

[9]  P. E. Sharp Multiple spatial/behavioral correlates for cells in the rat postsubiculum: multiple regression analysis and comparison to other hippocampal areas. , 1996, Cerebral cortex.

[10]  M. Petrides,et al.  Selectivity of the spatial learning deficit after lesions of the mammillary region in rats , 2000, Hippocampus.

[11]  T. van Groen,et al.  Connections of the retrosplenial granular a cortex in the rat , 1990, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[12]  M. Petrides,et al.  Memory Impairments Following Lesions to the Mammillary Region of the Rat , 1993, The European journal of neuroscience.

[13]  J. M. Wyss,et al.  Evidence for some collateralization between cortical and diencephalic efferent axons of the rat subicular cortex , 1983, Brain Research.

[14]  T. van Groen,et al.  Connections of the retrosplenial granular b cortex in the rat , 1990, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[15]  D. Amaral,et al.  The Hippocampal Formation , 2009 .

[16]  Michael W. Miller,et al.  Cortical connections between rat cingulate cortex and visual, motor, and postsubicular cortices , 1983, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[17]  M. Goodale,et al.  Separate visual pathways for perception and action , 1992, Trends in Neurosciences.

[18]  J. Taube,et al.  Behavioral/systems/cognitive Hippocampal Place Cell Instability after Lesions of the Head Direction Cell Network , 2022 .

[19]  J. Bassett,et al.  Persistent neural activity in head direction cells. , 2003, Cerebral cortex.

[20]  M. Seki,et al.  Anterior thalamic afferents from the mamillary body and the limbic cortex in the rat , 1984, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[21]  H. Shibata Direct projections from the anterior thalamic nuclei to the retrohippocampal region in the rat , 1993, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[22]  A. Gonzalo-Ruiz,et al.  Glutamate/aspartate and leu-enkephalin immunoreactivity in mammillothalamic projection neurons of the rat , 1998, Brain Research Bulletin.

[23]  L. E. White,et al.  Origin of the direct hippocampus-anterior thalamic bundle in the rat: A combined horseradish peroxidase-Golgi analysis , 1977, Experimental Neurology.

[24]  H. Shibata,et al.  Topographic organization of subcortical projections to the anterior thalamic nuclei in the rat , 1992, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[25]  R. Muller,et al.  Head-direction cells recorded from the postsubiculum in freely moving rats. II. Effects of environmental manipulations , 1990, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[26]  A. Vercelli,et al.  Anatomical organization of the telencephalic connections of the parafascicular nucleus in adult and developing rats , 2003, The European journal of neuroscience.

[27]  R. Sutherland,et al.  The role of the fornix/fimbria and some related subcortical structures in place learning and memory , 1989, Behavioural Brain Research.

[28]  R. C. Honey,et al.  Lesions of the mammillothalamic tract impair the acquisition of spatial but not nonspatial contextual conditional discriminations , 2003, The European journal of neuroscience.

[29]  Larry W. Swanson,et al.  Brain Maps: Structure of the Rat Brain , 1992 .

[30]  J. Aggleton,et al.  Evidence of a Spatial Encoding Deficit in Rats with Lesions of the Mammillary Bodies or Mammillothalamic Tract , 2003, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[31]  M. Fyhn,et al.  Spatial Representation in the Entorhinal Cortex , 2004, Science.

[32]  J. Taube,et al.  Lesions of the rat postsubiculum impair performance on spatial tasks. , 1992, Behavioral and neural biology.

[33]  N. Ishizuka,et al.  Laminar organization of the pyramidal cell layer of the subiculum in the rat , 2001, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[34]  M. Witter CHAPTER 21 – Hippocampal Formation , 2004 .

[35]  T. van Groen,et al.  Projections from the anterodorsal and anteroveniral nucleus of the thalamus to the limbic cortex in the rat , 1995, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[36]  J. Taube The head direction signal: origins and sensory-motor integration. , 2007, Annual review of neuroscience.

[37]  Brian R. Lee,et al.  Landmark control and updating of self-movement cues are largely maintained in head direction cells after lesions of the posterior parietal cortex. , 2008, Behavioral neuroscience.

[38]  H. Shibata Descending projections to the mammillary nuclei in the rat, as studied by retrograde and anterograde transport of wheat germ agglutinin–horseradish peroxidase , 1989, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[39]  O. Steward,et al.  On the role of hippocampal connections in the performance of place and cue tasks: comparisons with damage to hippocampus. , 1984, Behavioral neuroscience.

[40]  T. van Groen,et al.  The postsubicular cortex in the rat: characterization of the fourth region of the subicular cortex and its connections , 1990, Brain Research.

[41]  Dr. Finn-Mogens Šmejda Haug Sulphide Silver Pattern and Cytoarchitectonics of Parahippocampal Areas in the Rat , 1976, Advances in Anatomy, Embryology and Cell Biology / Ergebnisse der Anatomie und Entwicklungsgeschichte / Revues d’anatomie et de morphologie expérimentale.

[42]  Newton S. Canteras,et al.  The supragenual nucleus: A putative relay station for ascending vestibular signs to head direction cells , 2006, Brain Research.

[43]  Matthew L. Tullman,et al.  Lesions of the Tegmentomammillary Circuit in the Head Direction System Disrupt the Head Direction Signal in the Anterior Thalamus , 2007, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[44]  Jeffrey S. Taube,et al.  Impaired Head Direction Cell Representation in the Anterodorsal Thalamus after Lesions of the Retrosplenial Cortex , 2010, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[45]  D. Hopkins,et al.  Mamillary body in the rat: Topography and synaptology of projections from the subicular complex, prefrontal cortex, and midbrain tegmentum , 1989, The Journal of comparative neurology.