Weighted cue integration in the rodent head direction system

How the brain combines information from different sensory modalities and of differing reliability is an important and still-unanswered question. Using the head direction (HD) system as a model, we explored the resolution of conflicts between landmarks and background cues. Sensory cue integration models predict averaging of the two cues, whereas attractor models predict capture of the signal by the dominant cue. We found that a visual landmark mostly captured the HD signal at low conflicts: however, there was an increasing propensity for the cells to integrate the cues thereafter. A large conflict presented to naive rats resulted in greater visual cue capture (less integration) than in experienced rats, revealing an effect of experience. We propose that weighted cue integration in HD cells arises from dynamic plasticity of the feed-forward inputs to the network, causing within-trial spatial redistribution of the visual inputs onto the ring. This suggests that an attractor network can implement decision processes about cue reliability using simple architecture and learning rules, thus providing a potential neural substrate for weighted cue integration.

[1]  G. Paxinos,et al.  The Rat Brain in Stereotaxic Coordinates , 1983 .

[2]  R. Muller,et al.  Head-direction cells recorded from the postsubiculum in freely moving rats. II. Effects of environmental manipulations , 1990, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[3]  R U Muller,et al.  Head-direction cells recorded from the postsubiculum in freely moving rats. I. Description and quantitative analysis , 1990, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[4]  Bruce L. McNaughton,et al.  A Model of the Neural Basis of the Rat's Sense of Direction , 1994, NIPS.

[5]  B. McNaughton,et al.  Place cells, head direction cells, and the learning of landmark stability , 1995, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[6]  J. Taube Place cells recorded in the parasubiculum of freely moving rats , 1995, Hippocampus.

[7]  J. Taube,et al.  Head direction cell activity monitored in a novel environment and during a cue conflict situation. , 1995, Journal of neurophysiology.

[8]  J S Taube,et al.  Preferential use of the landmark navigational system by head direction cells in rats. , 1995, Behavioral neuroscience.

[9]  J. Taube Head direction cells recorded in the anterior thalamic nuclei of freely moving rats , 1995, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[10]  J. Taube,et al.  The effects of disorientation on visual landmark control of head direction cell orientation , 1997, Experimental Brain Research.

[11]  R U Muller,et al.  Variable place-cell coupling to a continuously viewed stimulus: evidence that the hippocampus acts as a perceptual system. , 1997, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[12]  B. McNaughton,et al.  Interactions between idiothetic cues and external landmarks in the control of place cells and head direction cells. , 1998, Journal of neurophysiology.

[13]  J. Taube,et al.  Cue control and head direction cells. , 1998, Behavioral neuroscience.

[14]  A. Redish Beyond the Cognitive Map: From Place Cells to Episodic Memory , 1999 .

[15]  Sidney I. Wiener,et al.  Influence of conflicting visual, inertial and substratal cues on head direction cell activity , 2000, Experimental Brain Research.

[16]  A. Berthoz,et al.  Background, But Not Foreground, Spatial Cues Are Taken as References for Head Direction Responses by Rat Anterodorsal Thalamus Neurons , 2001, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[17]  J. Bassett,et al.  Passive transport disrupts directional path integration by rat head direction cells. , 2003, Journal of neurophysiology.

[18]  A. Berthoz,et al.  Rapid Spatial Reorientation and Head Direction Cells , 2003, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[19]  Angelo Arleo,et al.  Rat anterodorsal thalamic head direction neurons depend upon dynamic visual signals to select anchoring landmark cues , 2004, The European journal of neuroscience.

[20]  Nicolas Brunel,et al.  A Continuous Attractor Network Model Without Recurrent Excitation: Maintenance and Integration in the Head Direction Cell System , 2005, Journal of Computational Neuroscience.

[21]  J. Knierim,et al.  Head Direction Cell Representations Maintain Internal Coherence during Conflicting Proximal and Distal Cue Rotations: Comparison with Hippocampal Place Cells , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[22]  J. Taube The head direction signal: origins and sensory-motor integration. , 2007, Annual review of neuroscience.

[23]  Philipp Berens,et al.  CircStat: AMATLABToolbox for Circular Statistics , 2009, Journal of Statistical Software.

[24]  Emma R Wood,et al.  Evidence for the use of an internal sense of direction in homing. , 2010, Behavioral neuroscience.

[25]  B. J. Clark,et al.  Intact landmark control and angular path integration by head direction cells in the anterodorsal thalamus after lesions of the medial entorhinal cortex , 2011, Hippocampus.

[26]  Robin Hayman,et al.  Geometric Cues Influence Head Direction Cells Only Weakly in Nondisoriented Rats , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[27]  Benjamin J Clark,et al.  Control of anterodorsal thalamic head direction cells by environmental boundaries: Comparison with conflicting distal landmarks , 2012, Hippocampus.

[28]  Kathryn J. Jeffery,et al.  A theoretical account of cue averaging in the rodent head direction system , 2014, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.