Exploring Legal Patent Citations for Patent Valuation

Effective patent valuation is important for patent holders. Forward patent citations, widely used in assessing patent value, have been considered as reflecting knowledge flows, just like paper citations. However, patent citations also carry legal implication, which is important for patent valuation. We argue that patent citations can either be technological citations that indicate knowledge transfer or be legal citations that delimit the legal scope of citing patents. In this paper, we first develop citation-network based methods to infer patent quality measures at either the legal or technological dimension. Then we propose a probabilistic mixture approach to incorporate both the legal and technological dimensions in patent citations, and an iterative learning process that integrates a temporal decay function on legal citations, a probabilistic citation network based algorithm and a prediction model for patent valuation. We learn all the parameters together and use them for patent valuation. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach by using patent maintenance status as an indicator of patent value and discuss the insights we learned from this study.

[1]  Rajeev Motwani,et al.  The PageRank Citation Ranking : Bringing Order to the Web , 1999, WWW 1999.

[2]  Bart Leten,et al.  The Market Value of Blocking Patent Citations , 2011 .

[3]  Bronwyn H Hall,et al.  Market value and patent citations , 2005 .

[4]  Ellis Horowitz,et al.  FindCite: automatically finding prior art patents , 2009 .

[5]  Peng Xu,et al.  Finding nuggets in IP portfolios: core patent mining through textual temporal analysis , 2012, CIKM '12.

[6]  Jon M Kleinberg,et al.  Hubs, authorities, and communities , 1999, CSUR.

[7]  Andreas Rauber,et al.  Improving Retrievability of Patents in Prior-Art Search , 2010, ECIR.

[8]  D. Harhoff,et al.  Citation Frequency and the Value of Patented Inventions , 1999, Review of Economics and Statistics.

[9]  M. Trajtenberg A Penny for Your Quotes : Patent Citations and the Value of Innovations , 1990 .

[10]  Yunsong Guo,et al.  Ranking Structured Documents: A Large Margin Based Approach for Patent Prior Art Search , 2009, IJCAI.

[11]  Yan Liu,et al.  Latent graphical models for quantifying and predicting patent quality , 2011, KDD.

[12]  Xin Jin,et al.  Patent Maintenance Recommendation with Patent Information Network Model , 2011, 2011 IEEE 11th International Conference on Data Mining.

[13]  M. Gittelman,et al.  Applicant and Examiner Citations in US Patents: An Overview and Analysis , 2008 .

[14]  W. Scott Spangler,et al.  COA: finding novel patents through text analysis , 2009, KDD.

[15]  Ronald J. Mann,et al.  A New Look at Patent Quality: Relating Patent Prosecution to Validity , 2010 .

[16]  Ronald J. Mann,et al.  A New Look at Patent Quality: Relating Patent Prosecution to Validity , 2012 .

[17]  W. Scott Spangler,et al.  SIMPLE: A Strategic Information Mining Platform for Licensing and Execution , 2009, 2009 IEEE International Conference on Data Mining Workshops.

[18]  Akira Tajima,et al.  Modeling Patent Quality: A System for Large-scale Patentability Analysis using Text Mining , 2012, J. Inf. Process..

[19]  Thorsten Joachims,et al.  Identifying Temporal Patterns and Key Players in Document Collections , 1995 .