Search and discovery across collections: The IMLS digital collections and content project

In the fall of 2002, the University of Illinois Library at Urbana‐Champaign received a grant from the Institute of Museum and Library Services (IMLS) to implement a collection registry and item‐level metadata repository for digital collections and content created by or associated with projects funded under the IMLS National Leadership Grant (NLG) program. When built, the registry and metadata repository will facilitate retrieval of information about digital content related to past and present NLG projects. The process of creating these services also is allowing us to research and gain insight into the many issues associated with implementing such services and the magnitude of the potential benefit and utility of such services as a way to connect, bring together, and make more visible a broad range of heterogeneous digital content. This paper describes the genesis of the project, the rationale for architectural design decisions, challenges faced, and our progress to date.

[1]  Carole L. Palmer,et al.  Tracking Metadata Use for Digital Collections , 2003, Dublin Core Conference.

[2]  Peter Suber.  The case for OAI in the age of Google , 2004 .

[3]  Don Waters,et al.  Building on success, forging new ground: The question of sustainability , 2004, First Monday.

[4]  Sarah L. Shreeves,et al.  Experiences of Educators Using a Portal of Aggregated Metadata , 2004, J. Digit. Inf..

[5]  Diane I. Hillmann,et al.  The Continuum of Metadata Quality: Defining, Expressing, Exploiting , 2004 .

[6]  Michael Heaney.  An Analytical Model of Collections and their Catalogues , 1999 .

[7]  Timothy W. Cole,et al.  Harvesting cultural heritage metadata using the OAI protocol , 2003 .

[8]  Timothy W. Cole.  Creating a Framework of Guidance for Building Good Digital Collections , 2002, First Monday.

[9]  Martin Halbert.  The Metascholar Initiative: AmericanSouth.Org and MetaArchive.Org , 2003 .

[10]  David Seaman.  Deep Sharing: the Case for the Federated Digital Library , 2003 .

[11]  J. Ritchie.  Where is the—Collection? , 1940, Nature.

[12]  James Frew,et al.  Collection metadata solutions for digital library applications , 1999 .

[13]  Timothy W. Cole,et al.  Developing a Collection Registry for IMLS NLG Digital Collections , 2003, Dublin Core Conference.

[14]  Geraint Price,et al.  The invisible web: uncovering information sources search engines can't see. cyberage books , 2001 .

[15]  Carl Lagoze,et al.  A case study in metadata harvesting: the NSDL , 2003 .

[16]  Kathleen L. Maciuszko.  OCLC, a decade of development, 1967-1977 , 1984 .

[17]  Lorcan Dempsey.  The Recombinant Library , 2003 .

[18]  Chris Sherman,et al.  The Invisible Web: Uncovering Sources Search Engines Can't See , 2003, Libr. Trends.

[19]  Clifford A. Lynch.  Digital Collections, Digital Libraries and the Digitization of Cultural Heritage Information , 2002, First Monday.

[20]  Carole L. Palmer,et al.  Metadata practices and implications for federated collections , 2005, ASIST.

[21]  Pete Johnston,et al.  Collection Description Focus Collections and Collection Description Collection Description Focus , 2002 .

[22]  Carl Lagoze,et al.  NCSTRL: Design and deployment of a globally distributed digital library , 2000, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..