Comparison of milk culture, direct and nested polymerase chain reaction (PCR) with fecal culture based on samples from dairy herds infected with Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis.

Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis (MAP) is the etiologic agent of Johne's disease in cattle and other farm ruminants, and is also a suspected pathogen of Crohn's disease in humans. Development of diagnostic methods for MAP infection has been a challenge over the last few decades. The objective of this study was to investigate the relationship between different methods for detection of MAP in milk and fecal samples. A total of 134 milk samples and 110 feces samples were collected from 146 individual cows in 14 MAP-infected herds in southwestern Ontario. Culture, IS900 polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and nested PCR methods were used for detecting MAP in milk; results were compared with those of fecal culture. A significant relationship was found between milk culture, direct PCR, and nested PCR (P < 0.05). The fecal culture results were not related to any of the 3 assay methods used for the milk samples (P > 0.10). Although fecal culture showed a higher sensitivity than the milk culture method, the difference was not significant (P = 0.2473). The number of MAP colony-forming units (CFU) isolated by culture from fecal samples was, on average, higher than that isolated from milk samples (P = 0.0083). There was no significant correlation between the number of CFU cultured from milk and from feces (Pearson correlation coefficient = 0.1957, N = 63, P = 0.1243). The animals with high numbers of CFU in milk culture may not be detected by fecal culture at all, and vise versa. A significant proportion (29% to 41%) of the positive animals would be missed if only 1 culture method, instead of both milk and feces, were to be used for diagnosis. This suggests that the shedding of MAP in feces and milk is not synchronized. Most of the infected cows were low-level shedders. The proportion of low-level shedders may even be underestimated because MAP is killed during decontamination, thus reducing the chance of detection. Therefore, to identify suspected Johne's-infected animals using the tests in this study, both milk and feces samples should be collected in duplicate to enhance the diagnostic rate. The high MAP kill rate identified in the culture methods during decontamination may be compensated for by using the nested PCR method, which had a higher sensitivity than the IS900 PCR method used.

[1]  C. Hill,et al.  Rapid Real-Time PCR Assay for Detection and Quantitation of Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis DNA in Artificially Contaminated Milk , 2004, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[2]  L. Mutharia,et al.  Improved template DNA preparation procedure for detection of Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis in milk by PCR. , 2007, Journal of microbiological methods.

[3]  S. Wells,et al.  Herd-level economic losses associated with Johne's disease on US dairy operations. , 1999, Preventive veterinary medicine.

[4]  R. Haring,et al.  Evaluation of the abilities of three diagnostic tests based on the polymerase chain reaction to detect Mycobacterium paratuberculosis in cattle: application in a control program , 1992, Journal of clinical microbiology.

[5]  S. Wells,et al.  Relationships between fecal culture, ELISA, and bulk tank milk test results for Johne's disease in US dairy herds. , 2002, Journal of dairy science.

[6]  J. Sanderson,et al.  IS900 PCR to detect Mycobacterium paratuberculosis in retail supplies of whole pasteurized cows' milk in England and Wales , 1996, Applied and environmental microbiology.

[7]  V. Gupta,et al.  Evaluation of highly sensitive indigenous milk ELISA kit with fecal culture, milk culture and fecal-PCR for the diagnosis of bovine Johne's disease (BJD) in India. , 2007, Comparative immunology, microbiology and infectious diseases.

[8]  L. Mutharia,et al.  Use of the bead beater for preparation of Mycobacterium paratuberculosis template DNA in milk. , 2001, Canadian journal of veterinary research = Revue canadienne de recherche veterinaire.

[9]  J. Sheridan,et al.  Causation of Crohn's disease by Mycobacterium avium subspecies paratuberculosis. , 2000, Canadian journal of gastroenterology = Journal canadien de gastroenterologie.

[10]  C. Kohler,et al.  Detection of Mycobacterium avium subspecies paratuberculosis in Swiss dairy cattle by real‐time PCR and culture: a comparison of the two assays , 2005, Journal of applied microbiology.

[11]  J. Stabel An Improved Method for Cultivation of Mycobacterium Paratuberculosis from Bovine Fecal Samples and Comparison to Three Other Methods , 1997, Journal of veterinary diagnostic investigation : official publication of the American Association of Veterinary Laboratory Diagnosticians, Inc.

[12]  A. Cataldi,et al.  Application of different methods for the diagnosis of paratuberculosis in a dairy cattle herd in Argentina. , 2003, Journal of veterinary medicine. B, Infectious diseases and veterinary public health.

[13]  R. Sweeney,et al.  Mycobacterium paratuberculosis cultured from milk and supramammary lymph nodes of infected asymptomatic cows , 1992, Journal of clinical microbiology.

[14]  R. Whittington,et al.  Progress towards understanding the spread, detection and control of Mycobacterium avium subsp paratuberculosis in animal populations. , 2001, Australian veterinary journal.

[15]  J. M. Sharp,et al.  Paratuberculosis Infection of Nonruminant Wildlife in Scotland , 2001, Journal of Clinical Microbiology.

[16]  R. Streeter,et al.  Isolation of Mycobacterium paratuberculosis from colostrum and milk of subclinically infected cows. , 1995, American journal of veterinary research.

[17]  L. Mutharia,et al.  Development of improved method for isolation of Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis from bulk tank milk: effect of age of milk, centrifugation, and decontamination. , 2005, Canadian journal of veterinary research = Revue canadienne de recherche veterinaire.

[18]  D. Kelton,et al.  Efficacy of monensin sodium for the reduction of fecal shedding of Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis in infected dairy cattle. , 2005, Preventive veterinary medicine.

[19]  D. Hunter,et al.  Rapid and Sensitive Detection of Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis in Bovine Milk and Feces by a Combination of Immunomagnetic Bead Separation-Conventional PCR and Real-Time PCR , 2004, Journal of Clinical Microbiology.

[20]  D. Callihan,et al.  Cultivation of Mycobacterium Paratuberculosis from Bovine Fecal Specimens and a Suggested Standardized Procedure , 1991, Journal of veterinary diagnostic investigation : official publication of the American Association of Veterinary Laboratory Diagnosticians, Inc.