Relative Comprehensibility of Pictorial Information and Printed Words in Proceduralized Instructions
暂无分享,去创建一个
A study was conducted to compare the relative comprehensibility of pictorial information and printed words in instructions. Six picture-word formats were examined using 24 procedural problems on three types of tasks. The formats were print-only, pictorial-only, pictorial-related print, print-related pictorial, pictorial-redundant print, and print-redundant pictorial. The results showed pictorial information important for speed but print information necessary for accuracy. Comprehension of instructions on all three tasks was most efficient with the pictorial-related print and pictorial-redundant print formats but could not be shown to be simply a function of number of visual information channels used or the degree of redundancy between channels. The type of information displayed in the visual channels was found to be important.
[1] R. Haber. How we remember what we see. , 1970, Scientific American.
[2] F. W. Wicker,et al. On the locus of picture-word differences in paired-associate learning , 1970 .
[3] Alphonse Chapanis,et al. “Words, Words, Words”1 , 1965 .