Evaluation on Information Model about Sensors Featured by Relationships to Measured Structural Objects

In accordance with the requirements of expanding Machine-To-Machine communication (M2M), the network overlay is in progress in several domains such as Smart Grid. Consequently, it is predictable that opportunities and cases of integrating yielded data from devices such as sensors will increase more. Accordingly, the importance of Ontology and Information Models (IM) which normalize the semantics including sensor expressions, have increased, and the standards of these definitions have been more important as well. So far, there have been multiple initiatives for standardizing the Ontology and IM in regards to the sensors expression such as Sensor Standards Harmonization by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), W3C Semantic Sensor Network (SSN) and the recent W3C IoT-Lite Ontology. However, there is still room to improve the current level of the Ontology and IM on the viewpoint of the implementing structure. This paper presents a set of IMs on abstract sensors and contexts in regards to the phenomenon around these sensors from the point of view of a structure implementing these specified sensors. As several previous studies have pointed out, multiple aspects on the sensors should be modeled. Accordingly, multiple sets of Ontology and IM on these sensors should be defined. Our study has intended to clarify the relationship between configurations and physical measured quantities of the structures implementing a set of sensors. Up to present, they have not been generalized and have remained unformulated. Consequently, due to the result of this analysis, it is expected to implement a more generalized translator module easily, which aggregates the measured data from the sensors on the middleware level managing these Ontology and IM, instead of the layer of user application programs.

[1]  Dan A. Simovici,et al.  Relational Database Systems , 1995 .

[2]  Karl Aberer,et al.  Deriving Semantic Sensor Metadata from Raw Measurements , 2012, SSN.

[3]  David Gómez,et al.  A Proof-of-Concept for Semantically Interoperable Federation of IoT Experimentation Facilities , 2016, Sensors.

[4]  Oscar Corcho,et al.  Semantic Sensor Network XG Final Report , 2011 .

[5]  Kang Lee Sensor standards harmonization-path to achiewving sensor interoperability , 2007, 2007 IEEE Autotestcon.

[6]  Flora Amato,et al.  A Common Data Model for Sensor Network Integration , 2010, 2010 International Conference on Complex, Intelligent and Software Intensive Systems.

[7]  Andreas Wombacher,et al.  Observation Centric Sensor Data Model , 2010 .

[8]  Wolfgang Wilkes Networking among product ontologies: The standard ISO13584 - PLIB and related developments , 2005, GI Jahrestagung.

[9]  Nengcheng Chen,et al.  A sensor capability information model under Geospatial Sensor Web environment , 2013, 2013 Second International Conference on Agro-Geoinformatics (Agro-Geoinformatics).

[10]  Cartik R. Kothari,et al.  Building a Sensor Ontology: A Practical Approach Leveraging ISO and OGC Models , 2005, IC-AI.

[11]  Robert Laurini,et al.  Towards Real Time Metadata for Network-Based Geographic Databases , 2007 .

[12]  Amit P. Sheth,et al.  A Survey of the Semantic Specification of Sensors , 2009, SSN.

[13]  Amit P. Sheth,et al.  The SSN ontology of the W3C semantic sensor network incubator group , 2012, J. Web Semant..

[14]  Amit P. Sheth,et al.  Semantic Sensor Web , 2008, IEEE Internet Computing.

[15]  Salvatore F. Pileggi A Novel Domain Ontology for Sensor Networks , 2010, 2010 Second International Conference on Computational Intelligence, Modelling and Simulation.

[16]  Maarten J. Korsten,et al.  Sensor specification using the ISA and STEP standards for sensor selection , 2003 .