The impact of online game character's outward attractiveness and social status on interpersonal attraction

Online games resemble miniature societies, in which social interactions occur within a virtual world. Previous studies have realized that the main motivation in playing games is to fulfill interpersonal needs. Players expect to own great interpersonal attraction to help them develop ideal interpersonal relationships. In the real world, individual outward appearance and social status are two important factors having influence on interpersonal attraction. In online games, the outward appearance of characters can be manipulated by changing the clothes and accessories used by those characters. This study proposes that difference in outward appearance, as in real society, affects player interpersonal attraction assessments. Additionally, when game experience and performance of players are accumulated, their grade in game would be raised. This study also proposes that the variation of role grade would influence its social status and the attitude of others. This study conducts experiments, and the results verify that a game character with high outward attractiveness and social status acquires higher online interpersonal attraction than one with low outward attractiveness and social status, and vice versa.

[1]  Deborah A. Byrnes,et al.  Classroom Social Status, Ethnicity, and Ratings of Stressful Events. , 1984 .

[2]  Ted L. Huston,et al.  Ambiguity of acceptance, social desirability, and dating choice , 1973 .

[3]  Allan Mazur,et al.  A Biosocial Model of Status in Face-to-Face Primate Groups , 1985 .

[4]  T. Huston,et al.  Physical attractiveness and assertiveness. , 1975, The Journal of social psychology.

[5]  T. D. Kemper.  Predicting emotions from social relations , 1991 .

[6]  James C. Ward,et al.  Virtual Community: a Sociocognitive Analysis , 1996 .

[7]  E. Herzka,et al.  [Individual psychology]. , 1950, Hospitalis.

[8]  J. Townsend,et al.  Sex differences in sexuality among medical students: Effects of increasing socioeconomic status , 1987, Archives of sexual behavior.

[9]  T. Huston,et al.  Interpersonal attraction and relationships. , 1978, Annual review of psychology.

[10]  Mark D. Griffiths,et al.  Demographic Factors and Playing Variables in Online Computer Gaming , 2004, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[11]  Roland Tisljár,et al.  Humor and interpersonal attraction: How gender, personality and physique affect humor preference , 2010 .

[12]  Stephen C. Jones,et al.  The self-fulfilling prophecy and interpersonal attraction , 1971 .

[13]  E. Berscheid,et al.  Physical Attractiveness and Peer Perception Among Children , 1974 .

[14]  J. Barkow,et al.  Prestige and Culture: A Biosocial Interpretation [and Comments and Replies] , 1975, Current Anthropology.

[15]  I. Bernstein,et al.  Dominance: Measure first and then define , 1981, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[16]  S. Fiske,et al.  Controlling other people. The impact of power on stereotyping. , 1993, The American psychologist.

[17]  G. William Walster,et al.  Physical attractiveness and dating choice: A test of the matching hypothesis☆ , 1971 .

[18]  Shanhong Luo,et al.  Interpersonal attraction and personality: what is attractive--self similarity, ideal similarity, complementarity or attachment security? , 2003, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[19]  Daniel Stewart.  Social Status in an Open-Source Community , 2005 .

[20]  Mathias Klang,et al.  Avatar: From Deity to Corporate Property A philosophical inquiry into digital property in online games , 2004 .

[21]  Joyce Hogan,et al.  Personality and Status , 1991 .

[22]  D. Barash.  Human Ethology , 1973 .

[23]  David A. Owens,et al.  Status contests in meetings: Negotiating the informal order. , 2001 .

[24]  Martin A. Johnson.  Variables associated with friendship in an adult population , 1989 .

[25]  Chih-Chien Wang,et al.  Physical Interpersonal Relationships and Social Anxiety among Online Game Players , 2005, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[26]  Mark D. Griffiths,et al.  Breaking the Stereotype: The Case of Online Gaming , 2003, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[27]  A. Feingold.  Good-looking people are not what we think. , 1992 .

[28]  J. Townsend,et al.  Effects of potential partners' physical attractiveness and socioeconomic status on sexuality and partner selection , 1990, Archives of sexual behavior.

[29]  C Anderson,et al.  Who attains social status? Effects of personality and physical attractiveness in social groups. , 2001, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[30]  J. Townsend,et al.  Mate selection criteria. A pilot study , 1989 .

[31]  Samuel Juni,et al.  Interpersonal touching as a function of status and sex. , 1981 .

[32]  C. Murchison,et al.  Psychologies of 1930 , 1930 .

[33]  J. Martin,et al.  Is Power Sexy?1 , 2005, American Journal of Sociology.

[34]  Sanford Grossbart,et al.  Usenet Groups, Virtual Community and Consumer Behaviors , 1998 .

[35]  B. Gillen,et al.  Physical Attractiveness , 1981 .

[36]  Karen Korabik.  Changes in Physical Attractiveness and Interpersonal Attraction , 1981 .

[37]  J. Mccroskey,et al.  The measurement of interpersonal attraction , 1974 .

[38]  Keith Gibbins,et al.  A New Theory of Fashion Change: a Test of Some Predictions , 1975 .

[39]  Ted L. Huston,et al.  Social Perception of Middle-Aged Persons Varying in Physical Attractiveness. , 1975 .

[40]  S. W. Gregory,et al.  The Impact of Physical Attractiveness on Women's Social Status and Interactional Power , 2005 .

[41]  J. Berger.  Status Characteristics and Social Interaction: An Expectation-States Approach , 1976 .

[42]  Gary D. Levy,et al.  Effects of Potential Partners' Costume and Physical Attractiveness on Sexuality and Partner Selection , 1990 .

[43]  張富鈞,et al.  從人際吸引(interpersonal attraction)的觀點談體育課中師生的互動 , 2000 .

[44]  Paula C. Morrow,et al.  Physical Attractiveness and Selection Decision Making , 1990 .

[45]  Richard Schmuck,et al.  Some Relationships of Peer Liking Patterns in the Classroom to Pupil Attitudes and Achievement , 1963, The School Review.

[46]  James C. McElroy,et al.  Physical Attractiveness on Cognitive Evaluations of Saleswomen’s Performance , 1999 .

[47]  Scott R. Beach,et al.  Exposure effects in the classroom: The development of affinity among students , 1992 .