Flow field characteristics analysis and combustion modes classification for a strut/cavity dual-mode combustor

Abstract Experimental and numerical study of a strut/cavity dual-mode combustor has been conducted in this paper. Under different fuel equivalence ratio and allocation proportion conditions, the pressure distribution and flow field structure of combustor show distinct characteristics. For strut fuel injecting at a low equivalence ratio, the luminosity images show that combustion zone distributes in the shear layer behind the strut. The wall fuel injecting before strut would change the starting point of pressure rising. Based on the flow field structure, the dual-mode combustor operation process is classified into three combustion modes, including scramjet mode, weak ramjet mode and strong ramjet mode. Because of a strong interaction of the shock wave with the boundary layer, weak ramjet mode has a stronger isolator compression effect and higher combustion efficiency than scramjet mode. With heat release increasing, the thermal throat formation is an indication of the strong ramjet mode, which has a subsonic gap in the isolator. Further, by judging the pressure from dominant pressure sensor before the strut, the three different combustion modes could be classified. Comparing the specific impulse of combustor, it has an obvious distinction in the different combustion modes.

[1]  H.Tanaka,et al.  Mach 2 Supersonic Combustion with Hydrocarbon Fuels in a Rectangular Scramjet Combustor , 2003 .

[2]  Li Yan,et al.  Numerical investigation on the ram–scram transition mechanism in a strut-based dual-mode scramjet combustor , 2016 .

[3]  Jun Liu,et al.  Effect of cavity location on combustion flow field of integrated hypersonic vehicle in near space , 2011, J. Vis..

[4]  Jens von Wolfersdorf,et al.  Numerical Study of Supersonic Combustion Processes with Central Strut Injection , 2010 .

[5]  Haiyan Wu,et al.  Combustion modes of hydrogen jet combustion in a cavity-based supersonic combustor , 2013 .

[6]  Sadatake Tomioka,et al.  Experimental Study on Effect of Boundary Layer on Combustion Modes in a Supersonic Combustor , 2010 .

[7]  Sadatake Tomioka,et al.  Experimental Study on Combustion Modes in a Supersonic Combustor , 2011 .

[8]  Daren Yu,et al.  Numerical investigation of the impact of asymmetric fuel injection on shock train characteristics , 2014 .

[9]  Wen Bao,et al.  Influence factor analysis of performance parameter for a strut/cavity supersonic combustor , 2015 .

[10]  Ye Tian,et al.  Experimental and numerical investigations of combustion mode transition in a direct–connect scramjet combustor , 2015 .

[11]  Zhenguo Wang,et al.  Theoretical analysis of flamelet model for supersonic turbulent combustion , 2012 .

[12]  Nickolay Smirnov,et al.  Detonation engine fed by acetylene–oxygen mixture , 2014 .

[13]  Goro Masuya,et al.  Mechanism and Control of Combustion-Mode Transition in a Scramjet Engine , 2012 .

[14]  Xianggeng Wei,et al.  Large eddy simulation of combustion characteristics in a kerosene fueled rocket-based combined-cycle engine combustor , 2016 .

[15]  Jianhan Liang,et al.  Experimental investigation on combustion performance of cavity-strut injection of supercritical kerosene in supersonic model combustor , 2016 .

[16]  Christopher P. Goyne,et al.  Experimental Study of Vitiation Effects on Scramjet Mode Transition , 2011 .

[17]  Rui Xue,et al.  Combustion oscillation study in a kerosene fueled rocket-based combined-cycle engine combustor , 2016 .

[18]  F. Billig,et al.  Combustion Processes in Supersonic Flow , 1988 .

[19]  M. Sun,et al.  Flame Flashback in a Supersonic Combustor Fueled by Ethylene with Cavity Flameholder , 2015 .

[20]  V. Babu,et al.  Numerical investigation of the supersonic combustion of kerosene in a strut-based combustor , 2010 .

[21]  William H. Heiser,et al.  Hypersonic Airbreathing Propulsion , 1994 .

[22]  Wen Bao,et al.  Numerical and experimental investigation of improving combustion performance of variable geometry dual-mode combustor , 2017 .

[23]  Nickolay Smirnov,et al.  Deflagration-to-detonation transition in gases in tubes with cavities , 2010 .

[24]  Li Yan,et al.  Numerical exploration of mixing and combustion in a dual-mode combustor with backward-facing steps , 2016 .

[25]  F. Menter.  ZONAL TWO EQUATION k-w TURBULENCE MODELS FOR AERODYNAMIC FLOWS , 1993 .

[26]  Takeshi Kanda,et al.  Dual-Mode Operations in a Scramjet Combustor , 2004 .

[27]  Wen Bao,et al.  Nonlinear characteristics and detection of combustion modes for a hydrocarbon fueled scramjet , 2015 .

[28]  Wei Huang,et al.  Molecular weight and injector configuration effects on the transverse injection flow field properties in supersonic flows , 2014 .

[29]  Jens von Wolfersdorf,et al.  Experimental Investigations of Scramjet Combustor Characteristics , 2008 .

[30]  Jens von Wolfersdorf,et al.  Experimental Study on Combustion Mode Transition in a Scramjet with Parallel Injection , 2006 .

[31]  Kenneth H. Yu,et al.  Three-Dimensional Nature of Shock Trains in Rectangular Scramjet Isolators , 2016 .

[32]  J. Driscoll,et al.  Combustion characteristics of a dual-mode scramjet combustor with cavity flameholder , 2009 .

[33]  C. Westbrook,et al.  Chemical kinetic modeling of hydrocarbon combustion , 1984 .

[34]  Daniel B. Le,et al.  Experimental Study of a Dual-Mode Scramjet Isolator , 2005 .

[35]  Nickolay Smirnov,et al.  Accumulation of errors in numerical simulations of chemically reacting gas dynamics , 2015 .

[36]  Ronald S. Fry,et al.  A Century of Ramjet Propulsion Technology Evolution , 2004 .