Muscle fiber number in biceps brachii in bodybuilders and control subjects.

Muscle fiber numbers were estimated in vivo in biceps brachii in 5 elite male bodybuilders, 7 intermediate caliber bodybuilders, and 13 age-matched controls. Mean fiber area and collagen volume density were calculated from needle biopsies and muscle cross-sectional area by computerized tomographic scanning. Contralateral measurements in a subsample of seven subjects indicated the method for estimation of fiber numbers to have adequate reliability. There was a wide interindividual range for fiber numbers in biceps (172,085-418,884), but despite large differences in muscle size both bodybuilder groups possessed the same number of muscle fibers as the group of untrained controls. Although there was a high correlation between average cross-sectional fiber area and total muscle cross-sectional area within each group, many of the subjects with the largest muscles also tended to have a large number of fibers. Since there were equally well-trained subjects with fewer than normal fiber numbers, we interpret this finding to be due to genetic endowment rather than to training-induced hyperplasia. The proportion of muscle comprised of connective and other noncontractile tissue was the same for all subjects (approximately 13%), thus indicating greater absolute amounts of connective tissue in the trained subjects. We conclude that in humans, heavy resistance training directed toward achieving maximum size in skeletal muscle does not result in an increase in fiber numbers.

[1]  G C Elder,et al.  Variability of fiber type distributions within human muscles. , 1982, Journal of applied physiology: respiratory, environmental and exercise physiology.

[2]  W. Gonyea Role of exercise in inducing increases in skeletal muscle fiber number. , 1980, Journal of applied physiology: respiratory, environmental and exercise physiology.

[3]  F BUCHTHAL,et al.  Propagation velocity in electrically activated muscle fibres in man. , 1955, Acta physiologica Scandinavica.

[4]  P. D. Gollnick,et al.  Muscular enlargement and number of fibers in skeletal muscles of rats. , 1981, Journal of applied physiology: respiratory, environmental and exercise physiology.

[5]  R. L. Linscheid,et al.  Muscles across the elbow joint: a biomechanical analysis. , 1981, Journal of biomechanics.

[6]  E. Weibel A stereological method for estimating volume and surface of sarcoplasmic reticulum , 1972, Journal of microscopy.

[7]  T. Ingemann-Hansen,et al.  Variations in single fibre areas and fibre composition in needle biopsies from the human quadriceps muscle. , 1981, Scandinavian journal of clinical and laboratory investigation.

[8]  P. D. Gollnick,et al.  Fiber number and size in overloaded chicken anterior latissimus dorsi muscle. , 1983, Journal of applied physiology: respiratory, environmental and exercise physiology.

[9]  F. Hosseini,et al.  Frequency and size of muscle fibers in athletic body build , 1968, The Anatomical record.

[10]  W. Reitsma Skeletal muscle hypertrophy after heavy exercise in rats with surgically reduced muscle function. , 1969, American journal of physical medicine.

[11]  The relationship between the mean muscle fibre area and the muscle cross-sectional area of the thigh in subjects with large differences in thigh girth. , 1981, Acta physiologica Scandinavica.

[12]  P. Schantz,et al.  Muscle fibre type distribution, muscle cross-sectional area and maximal voluntary strength in humans. , 1983, Acta physiologica Scandinavica.

[13]  J Lexell,et al.  Distribution of different fibre types in human skeletal muscles. 2. A study of cross-sections of whole m. vastus lateralis. , 1983, Acta physiologica Scandinavica.

[14]  A. W. Martin,et al.  Hypertrophy and hyperplasia of adult chicken anterior latissimus dorsi muscles following stretch with and without denervation. , 1973, Experimental neurology.