IMPLICIT AND EXPLICIT CORRECTIVE FEEDBACK AND THE ACQUISITION OF L2 GRAMMAR

This article reviews previous studies of the effects of implicit and explicit corrective feedback on SLA, pointing out a number of methodological problems. It then reports on a new study of the effects of these two types of corrective feedback on the acquisition of past tense -ed. In an experimental design (two experimental groups and a control group), low-intermediate learners of second language English completed two communicative tasks during which they received either recasts (implicit feedback) or metalinguistic explanation (explicit feedback) in response to any utterance that contained an error in the target structure. Acquisition was measured by means of an oral imitation test (designed to measure implicit knowledge) and both an untimed grammaticality judgment test and a metalinguistic knowledge test (both designed to measure explicit knowledge). The tests were administered prior to the instruction, 1 day after the instruction, and again 2 weeks later. Statistical comparisons of the learners' performance on the posttests showed a clear advantage for explicit feedback over implicit feedback for both the delayed imitation and grammaticality judgment posttests. Thus, the results indicate that metalinguistic explanation benefited implicit as well as explicit knowledge and point to the importance of including measures of both types of knowledge in experimental studies.This research was funded by a Marsden Fund grant awarded by the Royal Society of Arts of New Zealand. Researchers other than the authors who contributed to the research were Jenefer Philip, Satomi Mizutami, Keiko Sakui, and Thomas Delaney. Thanks go to the editors of this special issue and to two anonymous SSLA reviewers of a draft of the article for their constructive comments.

[1]  Marina K. Burt,et al.  A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON THE CREATIVE CONSTRUCTION PROCESS IN CHILD SECOND LANGUAGE ACQUISITION1 , 1974 .

[2]  Michael H. Long.  Focus on Form: A Design Feature in Language Teaching Methodology , 1991 .

[3]  Susanne Carroll,et al.  The role of feedback in adult second language acquisition: Error correction and morphological generalizations , 1992, Applied Psycholinguistics.

[4]  B. D. Schwartz.  On Explicit and Negative Data Effecting and Affecting Competence and Linguistic Behavior , 1993, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.

[5]  Noriko Nagata,et al.  Intelligent Computer Feedback for Second Language Instruction , 1993 .

[6]  M. Swain,et al.  Explicit and Implicit Negative Feedback , 1993, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.

[7]  R. Dekeyser.  The effect of error correction on L2 grammar knowledge and oral proficiency , 1993 .

[8]  R. W. Schmidt.  DECONSTRUCTING CONSCIOUSNESS IS SEARCH OF USEFUL DEFINITIONS FOR APPLIED LINGUISTICS , 1994 .

[9]  Antonella Sorace,et al.  The Use of Acceptability Judgments in Second Language Acquisition Research , 1996 .

[10]  Michael H. Long.  The Role of the Linguistic Environment in Second Language Acquisition , 1996 .

[11]  R. Lyster,et al.  CORRECTIVE FEEDBACK AND LEARNER UPTAKE , 1997, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.

[12]  R. Lyster.  Negotiation of Form, Recasts, and Explicit Correction in Relation to Error Types and Learner Repair in Immersion Classrooms , 1998 .

[13]  Michael H. Long,et al.  The Role of Implicit Negative Feedback in SLA: Models and Recasts in Japanese and Spanish , 1998 .

[14]  Alison Mackey,et al.  INPUT, INTERACTION, AND SECOND LANGUAGE DEVELOPMENT , 1999, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.

[15]  Hitoshi Muranoi.  Focus on Form through Interaction Enhancement: Integrating Formal Instruction into a Communicative Task in EFL Classrooms. , 2000 .

[16]  Alison Mackey,et al.  HOW DO LEARNERS PERCEIVE INTERACTIONAL FEEDBACK? , 2000, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.

[17]  R. Dekeyser.  THE ROBUSTNESS OF CRITICAL PERIOD EFFECTS IN SECOND LANGUAGE ACQUISITION , 2000, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.

[18]  S. Gass,et al.  HOW DO LEARNERS PERCEIVE INTERACTIONAL FEEDBACK? , 2000, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.

[19]  G. Havranek,et al.  FACTORS AFFECTING THE SUCCESS OF CORRECTIVE FEEDBACK , 2001 .

[20]  P. Lightbown,et al.  Recasts as Feedback to Language Learners , 2001 .

[21]  ZhaoHong Han.  A Study of the Impact of Recasts on Tense Consistency in L2 Output , 2002 .

[22]  R. Lyster,et al.  Patterns of Corrective Feedback and Uptake in an Adult ESL Classroom , 2002 .

[23]  J. Leeman.  RECASTS AND SECOND LANGUAGE DEVELOPMENT , 2003, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.

[24]  Michael H. Long,et al.  The handbook of second language acquisition , 2003 .

[25]  Alison Mackey,et al.  Interactional Context and Feedback in Child ESL Classrooms. , 2003 .

[26]  Alison Mackey,et al.  Interactional input and the incorporation of feedback: An exploration of NS-NNS and NNS-NNS adult and child dyads , 2003 .

[27]  Jenefer Philp.  CONSTRAINTS ON “NOTICING THE GAP” , 2003, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.

[28]  Noriko Iwashita.  NEGATIVE FEEDBACK AND POSITIVE EVIDENCE IN TASK-BASED INTERACTION , 2003, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.

[29]  R. Lyster.  DIFFERENTIAL EFFECTS OF PROMPTS AND RECASTS IN FORM-FOCUSED INSTRUCTION , 2004, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.

[30]  R. Ellis.  The Definition and Measurement of L2 Explicit Knowledge , 2004 .

[31]  Younghee Sheen.  Corrective feedback and learner uptake in communicative classrooms across instructional settings , 2004 .

[32]  Ronald P. Leow,et al.  Awareness, different learning conditions, and second language development , 2004, Applied Psycholinguistics.

[33]  Dalila Ayoun.  The Effectiveness of Written Recasts in the Second Language Acquisition of Aspectual Distinctions in French: A Follow-Up Study , 2004 .

[34]  R. Ellis.  MEASURING IMPLICIT AND EXPLICIT KNOWLEDGE OF A SECOND LANGUAGE: A Psychometric Study , 2005, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.

[35]  N. Ellis.  AT THE INTERFACE: DYNAMIC INTERACTIONS OF EXPLICIT AND IMPLICIT LANGUAGE KNOWLEDGE , 2005, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.