Experimental and Finite Element Modeling of Penetrating Traumatic Brain Injury

To study penetrating traumatic brain injury biomechanics, a full metal jacket 9-mm handgun projectile was discharged into a transparent brain simulant (Sylgard gel). Five pressure transducers were placed at the entry (two), exit (two), and center (one) of the simulant. High-speed digital video photography at 20,000 frames per second (fps) was used to capture the temporal cavity pulsation. Pressure histories and high-speed video images were synchronized with a common trigger. Pressure data were sampled at 308 kHz. The 9-mm projectile had an entry velocity of 378 m/s and exit velocity of 259 m/s. Kinetic energy lost during penetration was 283.7 J. The projectile created temporary cavity with maximum diameter of 54 mm. Collapsing of the temporary cavity drew the brain simulant toward the center of the cavity and created negative pressures of approximately -0.5 atmospheric pressure in the surrounding region. Pressures reached approximately +2 atmospheric pressure when the temporary cavity collapsed. A three-dimensional finite element model was developed and validated with the pressure data from the experiment. The model revealed that shear deformations were pronounced in the region immediately adjacent to the projectile path (within 10 mm). Radial deformations extended further away from projectile path and widely spread through the model. These quantified data may assist in understanding injury biomechanics and management of penetration brain trauma. For the covering abstract see ITRD E141569.

[1]  T A Gennarelli,et al.  Comparison of mortality, morbidity, and severity of 59,713 head injured patients with 114,447 patients with extracranial injuries. , 1994, The Journal of trauma.

[2]  E. N. Harvey,et al.  Secondary damage in wounding due to pressure changes accompanying the passage of high velocity missiles. , 1947, Surgery.

[3]  N Yoganandan,et al.  Dynamic analysis of penetrating trauma. , 1997, The Journal of trauma.

[4]  M. Fackler,et al.  Wounding potential of the Russian AK-74 assault rifle. , 1984, The Journal of trauma.

[5]  W. Fp,et al.  Physical effects of the penetration of head simulants by steel spheres. , 1988 .

[6]  Michael J Thali,et al.  High-Speed Documented Experimental Gunshot to a Skull-Brain Model and Radiologic Virtual Autopsy , 2002, The American journal of forensic medicine and pathology.

[7]  M L Fackler,et al.  The wound profile: a visual method for quantifying gunshot wound components. , 1985, The Journal of trauma.

[8]  J. Martin,et al.  National Vital Statistics Reports , 2002 .

[9]  B. P. Pearce,et al.  Physical effects of the penetration of head simulants by steel spheres. , 1988, The Journal of trauma.

[10]  Martin L. Fackler What's Wrong with the Wound Ballistics Literature, and Why , 1987 .

[11]  D C Viano,et al.  Influence of the lateral ventricles and irregular skull base on brain kinematics due to sagittal plane head rotation. , 2002, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[12]  G S Nusholtz,et al.  Cavitation/boundary effects in a simple head impact model. , 1995, Aviation, space, and environmental medicine.

[13]  U Zollinger,et al.  The "skin-skull-brain model": a new instrument for the study of gunshot effects. , 2002, Forensic science international.

[14]  M L Fackler,et al.  Ordnance Gelatin for Ballistic Studies: Detrimental Effect of Excess Heat Used in Gelatin Preparation , 1988, The American journal of forensic medicine and pathology.

[15]  P. Bovendeerd,et al.  The large shear strain dynamic behaviour of in-vitro porcine brain tissue and a silicone gel model material. , 2000, Stapp car crash journal.

[16]  T A Gennarelli,et al.  Physical model simulations of brain injury in the primate. , 1990, Journal of biomechanics.