An audit of the toxicology findings in 555 medico-legal autopsies finds manner of death changed in 5 cases

[1]  R. Byard,et al.  Issues in the interpretation of postmortem toxicology , 2012, Forensic Science, Medicine, and Pathology.

[2]  O. Drummer,et al.  The role of toxicology interpretations in prevention of sudden death , 2012, Forensic Science, Medicine, and Pathology.

[3]  I. Roberts,et al.  Sudden death in epilepsy: standards of reporting and the value of toxicological analysis , 2011, Journal of Clinical Pathology.

[4]  S. Cina,et al.  Toxicology: What is Routine for Medicolegal Death Investigation Purposes? , 2011 .

[5]  D. Vlahov,et al.  Medical examiner and medical toxicologist agreement on cause of death. , 2011, Forensic science international.

[6]  J. Gill,et al.  Natural, Unexpected Deaths: Reliability of a Presumptive Diagnosis * , 2010, Journal of forensic sciences.

[7]  J. Booth,et al.  The Predictive Value of History and Scene Investigation for Toxicology Results in a Medical Examiner Population , 2007, The American journal of forensic medicine and pathology.

[8]  N. Langlois.  The Use of Histology in 638 Coronial Post-Mortem Examinations of Adults: An audit , 2006, Medicine, science, and the law.

[9]  S. Karch.  Is post-mortem toxicology quackery? , 2003, Journal of clinical forensic medicine.

[10]  G. Krejs,et al.  A toxicological surprise , 2000, The Lancet.

[11]  R. Harruff,et al.  Unexpected Amantadine Intoxication in the Death of a Trauma Patient , 1995, The American journal of forensic medicine and pathology.

[12]  G. Gantner,et al.  An unsuspected arsenic poisoning murder disclosed by forensic autopsy. , 1985, The American journal of forensic medicine and pathology.

[13]  G. Skopp.  Postmortem toxicology , 2010, Forensic science, medicine, and pathology.