The Speed of Recognition of Personally Familiar Faces

Despite the generally accepted notion that humans are very good and fast at recognising familiar individuals from their faces, the actual speed with which this fundamental brain function can be achieved remains largely unknown. Here, two groups of participants were required to respond by finger-lift when presented with either a photograph of a personally familiar face (classmate), or an unfamiliar one. This speeded manual go/no-go categorisation task revealed that personally familiar faces could be categorised as early as 380 ms after presentation, about 80 ms faster than unfamiliar faces. When response times were averaged across all 8 stimulus presentations, we found that minimum RTs for both familiar and unfamiliar face decisions were substantially lower (310 ms and 370 ms). Analyses confirmed that stimulus repetition enhanced the speed with which faces were categorised, irrespective of familiarity, and that repetition did not affect the observed benefit in RTS for familiar over unfamiliar faces. These data, representing the elapsed time from stimulus onset to motor output, put constraints on the time course of familiar face recognition in the human brain, which can be tracked more precisely by high temporal resolution electrophysiological measures.

[1]  V. Bruce Changing faces: visual and non-visual coding processes in face recognition. , 1982, British journal of psychology.

[2]  V. Bruce,et al.  Recognizing familiar faces: the role of distinctiveness and familiarity. , 1986, Canadian journal of psychology.

[3]  A. Young,et al.  Repetition Priming and Face Processing: Priming Occurs within the System that Responds to the Identity of a Face , 1990, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[4]  Werner Sommer,et al.  Repetition priming and associative priming of face recognition: Evidence from event-related potentials. , 1995 .

[5]  Denis Fize,et al.  Speed of processing in the human visual system , 1996, Nature.

[6]  P. Schyns,et al.  Information and viewpoint dependence in face recognition , 1997, Cognition.

[7]  B. Renault,et al.  Face and shape repetition effects in humans: a spatio‐temporal ERP study , 1997, Neuroreport.

[8]  C. Michel,et al.  Evidence for rapid face recognition from human scalp and intracranial electrodes , 1997, Neuroreport.

[9]  B. Renault,et al.  ERPs and chronometry of face recognition: following‐up Seeck et al. and George et al. , 1998, Neuroreport.

[10]  Tim Valentine,et al.  The Effect of Age of Acquisition on Speed and Accuracy of Naming Famous Faces , 1998, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[11]  V. Bruce,et al.  Face Recognition in Poor-Quality Video: Evidence From Security Surveillance , 1999 .

[12]  B. Rossion,et al.  Task modulation of brain activity related to familiar and unfamiliar face processing: an ERP study , 1999, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[13]  B Renault,et al.  Differential processing of part-to-whole and part-to-part face priming: an ERP study. , 1999, Neuroreport.

[14]  K. Nakayama,et al.  Robust representations for faces: evidence from visual search. , 1999, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[15]  Marcia Grabowecky,et al.  Electrophysiological Correlates of Recollecting Faces of Known and Unknown Individuals , 2000, NeuroImage.

[16]  L. Deouell,et al.  STRUCTURAL ENCODING AND IDENTIFICATION IN FACE PROCESSING: ERP EVIDENCE FOR SEPARATE MECHANISMS , 2000, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[17]  M. Eimer Event-related brain potentials distinguish processing stages involved in face perception and recognition , 2000, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[18]  Michael B. Lewis,et al.  The Effects of Massive Repetition on Speeded Recognition of Faces , 2000, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[19]  S. Thorpe,et al.  A Limit to the Speed of Processing in Ultra-Rapid Visual Categorization of Novel Natural Scenes , 2001, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[20]  Sam S. Rakover,et al.  Face Recognition: Cognitive and computational processes , 2001 .

[21]  S. Thorpe,et al.  Seeking Categories in the Brain , 2001, Science.

[22]  R VanRullen,et al.  Is it a Bird? Is it a Plane? Ultra-Rapid Visual Categorisation of Natural and Artifactual Objects , 2001, Perception.

[23]  V. Bruce,et al.  Matching identities of familiar and unfamiliar faces caught on CCTV images. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.

[24]  H. Bokura,et al.  Electrophysiological correlates for response inhibition in a Go/NoGo task , 2001, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[25]  Stefan R Schweinberger,et al.  Age-related slowing in face and name recognition: evidence from event-related brain potentials. , 2002, Psychology and aging.

[26]  A. Burton,et al.  Event-related brain potential evidence for a response of inferior temporal cortex to familiar face repetitions. , 2002, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[27]  Florence Thibaut,et al.  ERPs ASSOCIATED WITH FAMILIARITY AND DEGREE OF FAMILIARITY DURING FACE RECOGNITION , 2002, The International journal of neuroscience.

[28]  Israel Nachson,et al.  A serial test of the laterality of familiar face recognition , 2002, Brain and Cognition.

[29]  Guillaume A. Rousselet,et al.  Parallel processing in high-level categorization of natural images , 2002, Nature Neuroscience.

[30]  G. Rousselet,et al.  Is it an animal? Is it a human face? Fast processing in upright and inverted natural scenes. , 2003, Journal of vision.

[31]  M. Crommelinck,et al.  Is the N170 for faces cognitively penetrable? Evidence from repetition priming of Mooney faces of familiar and unfamiliar persons. , 2003, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[32]  Boutheina Jemel,et al.  Differential involvement of episodic and face representations in ERP repetition effects , 2003, Neuroreport.

[33]  H. Bülthoff,et al.  The use of facial motion and facial form during the processing of identity , 2003, Vision Research.

[34]  Stefan R Schweinberger,et al.  What's special about personally familiar faces? A multimodal approach. , 2004, Psychophysiology.

[35]  S. Tobimatsu,et al.  Familiarity facilitates the corticocortical processing of face perception , 2005, Neuroreport.

[36]  Mohamed Rebaï,et al.  Familiarity and emotional expression influence an early stage of face processing: An electrophysiological study , 2005, Brain and Cognition.

[37]  S. Thorpe,et al.  Rapid categorization of achromatic natural scenes: how robust at very low contrasts? , 2005, The European journal of neuroscience.

[38]  E. Ziegel Introduction to Robust Estimation and Hypothesis Testing (2nd ed.) , 2005 .

[39]  M. Junghöfer,et al.  Effects of personal familiarity on early neuromagnetic correlates of face perception , 2006, The European journal of neuroscience.

[40]  Mohamed Rebaï,et al.  The effects of inversion and eye displacements of familiar and unknown faces on early and late-stage ERPs. , 2006, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[41]  C. Jacques,et al.  The Speed of Individual Face Categorization , 2006, Psychological science.

[42]  James W. Tanaka,et al.  Activation of Preexisting and Acquired Face Representations: The N250 Event-related Potential as an Index of Face Familiarity , 2006, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[43]  Pawan Sinha,et al.  Face Recognition by Humans: Nineteen Results All Computer Vision Researchers Should Know About , 2006, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[44]  Ken A. Paller,et al.  Dissociating perceptual and representation-based contributions to priming of face recognition , 2006, Consciousness and Cognition.

[45]  Werner Sommer,et al.  Memory-related ERP components for experimentally learned faces and names: characteristics and parallel-test reliabilities. , 2007, Psychophysiology.

[46]  C. Jacques,et al.  The time course of the inversion effect during individual face discrimination. , 2007, Journal of vision.

[47]  Maria Pia Viggiano,et al.  Interplay between familiarity and orientation in face processing: an ERP study. , 2007, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[48]  Michèle Fabre-Thorpe,et al.  Effects of task requirements on rapid natural scene processing: from common sensory encoding to distinct decisional mechanisms. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[49]  Elana Zion-Golumbic,et al.  Electrophysiological neural mechanisms for detection, configural analysis and recognition of faces , 2007, NeuroImage.

[50]  Geoffrey K Aguirre,et al.  The effects of parts, wholes, and familiarity on face-selective responses in MEG. , 2008, Journal of vision.

[51]  P. Zelazo,et al.  The time course of social-emotional processing in early childhood: ERP responses to facial affect and personal familiarity in a Go-Nogo task , 2008, Neuropsychologia.

[52]  C. Carbon Famous Faces as Icons. The Illusion of Being an Expert in the Recognition of Famous Faces , 2008, Perception.

[53]  W. Sommer,et al.  Interaction of facial expressions and familiarity: ERP evidence , 2008, Biological Psychology.

[54]  A. Mike Burton,et al.  The bilateral advantage for famous faces: Interhemispheric communication or competition? , 2008, Neuropsychologia.

[55]  Patrik Vuilleumier,et al.  EEG-MEG evidence for early differential repetition effects for fearful, happy and neutral faces , 2009, Brain Research.

[56]  C. Jacques,et al.  The N170 : understanding the time-course of face perception in the human brain , 2011 .