Similarity-Based Interference and the Acquisition of Adjunct Control

Previous research on the acquisition of adjunct control has observed non-adultlike behavior for sentences like “John bumped Mary after tripping on the sidewalk.” While adults only allow a subject control interpretation for these sentences (that John tripped on the sidewalk), preschool-aged children have been reported to allow a much wider range of interpretations. A number of different tasks have been used with the aim of identifying a grammatical source of children’s errors. In this paper, we consider the role of extragrammatical factors. In two comprehension experiments, we demonstrate that error rates go up when the similarity increases between an antecedent and a linearly intervening noun phrase, first with similarity in gender, and next with similarity in number marking. This suggests that difficulties with adjunct control are to be explained (at least in part) by the sentence processing mechanisms that underlie similarity-based interference in adults.

[1]  I. Arnon,et al.  Rethinking child difficulty: The effect of NP type on children's processing of relative clauses in Hebrew* , 2009, Journal of Child Language.

[2]  Ellen F. Lau,et al.  Coreference and Antecedent Representation Across Languages , 2017, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[3]  E. Vogel,et al.  Multiple sources of interference in dual-task performance: the cases of the attentional blink and the psychological refractory period , 2001 .

[4]  Edward Gibson,et al.  Effects of NP type in reading cleft sentences in English , 2005 .

[5]  Zoe Schlueter (Mis)interpreting agreement attraction: Evidence from a novel dual-task paradigm , 2017 .

[6]  B. McElree,et al.  Retrieval interference in sentence comprehension. , 2006, Journal of memory and language.

[7]  Helen Goodluck,et al.  The Nominal Analysis of Children's Interpretations of Adjunct Pro Clauses , 2001 .

[8]  Naomi Feldman,et al.  Modeling Statistical Insensitivity: Sources of Suboptimal Behavior , 2017, Cogn. Sci..

[9]  Reinhold Kliegl,et al.  Discourse accessibility constraints in children’s processing of object relative clauses , 2015, Front. Psychol..

[10]  Luigi Rizzi,et al.  Locality and Left Periphery , 2004 .

[11]  Jeffrey Lidz,et al.  Statistical insensitivity in the acquisition of Tsez noun classes , 2014 .

[12]  P. Gordon,et al.  Similarity-based interference during language comprehension: Evidence from eye tracking during reading. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[13]  Luigi Rizzi,et al.  Does gender make a difference? Comparing the effect of gender on children's comprehension of relative clauses in Hebrew and Italian , 2012 .

[14]  Lyn Frazier,et al.  Feature manipulation in sentence comprehension: 2703 , 1999 .

[15]  P. Gordon,et al.  Effects of noun phrase type on sentence complexity , 2004 .

[16]  N. Lavie Perceptual load as a necessary condition for selective attention. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[17]  Ellen F. Lau,et al.  Agreement Attraction in Comprehension: Representations and Processes. , 2009 .

[18]  Kathryn Bock,et al.  Making syntax of sense: number agreement in sentence production. , 2005, Psychological review.

[19]  Dana McDaniel,et al.  Control Principles in the Grammars of Young Children , 1990 .

[20]  K. Bock,et al.  Broken agreement , 1991, Cognitive Psychology.

[21]  Allison Nicole Adler,et al.  Syntax and discourse in the acquisition of adjunct control , 2006 .

[22]  M. Pinto,et al.  Coloring Book: A new method for testing language comprehension , 2018, Behavior Research Methods.

[23]  Michael Tomasello,et al.  Object relatives made easy: A cross-linguistic comparison of the constraints influencing young children's processing of relative clauses , 2007 .

[24]  Brian Butterworth,et al.  Subject-verb agreement in Spanish and English: Differences in the role of conceptual constraints , 1996, Cognition.

[25]  Matthew W. Lowder,et al.  Effects of animacy and noun-phrase relatedness on the processing of complex sentences , 2014, Memory & cognition.

[26]  J. Sachs Recognition memory for syntactic and semantic aspects of connected discourse , 1967 .

[27]  Dana McDaniel,et al.  A Longitudinal Study of Principles of Control and Pronominal Reference in Child English , 1994 .

[28]  J. S. Nairne,et al.  A framework for interpreting recency effects in immediate serial recall , 1988, Memory & cognition.

[29]  Flavia Adani,et al.  Rethinking the acquisition of relative clauses in Italian: towards a grammatically based account. , 2011, Journal of child language.

[30]  Harald Clahsen,et al.  Children's Processing of Reflexives and Pronouns in English: Evidence from Eye-movements During Listening , 2011 .

[31]  R. Jarvella Syntactic processing of connected speech , 1971 .

[32]  Gabriella Vigliocco,et al.  When Sex Affects Syntax: Contextual Influences in Sentence Production , 2001 .

[33]  Robert J. Hartsuiker,et al.  One or more labels on the bottles? Notional concord in Dutch and French , 1996 .

[34]  Helen Smith Cairns,et al.  The development of grammars underlying children's interpretation of complex sentences , 1985, Cognition.

[35]  D. Lightfoot The development of grammars , 1998 .

[36]  Nelson Cowan,et al.  The development of memory in infancy and childhood , 2008 .

[37]  A. Treisman The binding problem , 1996, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[38]  Jared M. Novick,et al.  Broca's Area and Language Processing: Evidence for the Cognitive Control Connection , 2010, Lang. Linguistics Compass.

[39]  Susan M. Garnsey,et al.  Agreement Processes in Sentence Comprehension , 1999 .

[40]  Morton Ann Gernsbacher,et al.  Language Comprehension As Structure Building , 1990 .

[41]  George A Alvarez,et al.  How many objects can you track? Evidence for a resource-limited attentive tracking mechanism. , 2007, Journal of vision.

[42]  J. V. Van Dyke Interference effects from grammatically unavailable constituents during sentence processing. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[43]  A Treisman,et al.  Feature analysis in early vision: evidence from search asymmetries. , 1988, Psychological review.

[44]  Matthew W Lowder,et al.  The sentence-composition effect: processing of complex sentences depends on the configuration of common noun phrases versus unusual noun phrases. , 2011, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[45]  P. Gordon,et al.  Memory interference during language processing. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[46]  Maria Teresa Guasti,et al.  Grammatical feature dissimilarities make relative clauses easier: A comprehension study with Italian children , 2010, Lingua. International review of general linguistics. Revue internationale de linguistique generale.

[47]  Tessa C. Warren,et al.  The influence of referential processing on sentence complexity , 2002, Cognition.

[48]  Stephanie Durrleman,et al.  Children Don ’ t Like Restrictions : Evidence from the Acquisition of Object , 2014 .

[49]  Kathryn Bock,et al.  Notional number agreement in English , 2005, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[50]  Kenneth Wexler,et al.  Some Issues in the Growth of Control , 1992 .

[51]  S. Luck,et al.  How does attention attenuate target-distractor interference in vision?. Evidence from magnetoencephalographic recordings. , 2002, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[52]  W. O'grady,et al.  Asymmetry in children's comprehension of raising* , 2016, Journal of Child Language.

[53]  Julie A. Van Dyke,et al.  Memory Interference as a Determinant of Language Comprehension , 2012, Lang. Linguistics Compass.

[54]  Luigi Rizzi,et al.  Agreement and movement: A syntactic analysis of attraction , 2006, Cognition.

[55]  Peter C. Gordon,et al.  Complex Sentence Processing: A Review of Theoretical Perspectives on the Comprehension of Relative Clauses , 2012, Lang. Linguistics Compass.

[56]  Colin Phillips,et al.  Interference in the processing of adjunct control , 2015, Front. Psychol..

[57]  Luigi Rizzi,et al.  Refining intervention: the acquisition of featural relations in object A-bar dependencies , 2016 .

[58]  J. Zwart The Minimalist Program , 1998, Journal of Linguistics.

[59]  Anamaria Bentea,et al.  Not committing has its advantages: facilitating children's comprehension of object filler–gap dependencies is one of them* , 2017, Journal of Child Language.

[60]  Jeffrey Lidz,et al.  Linking Parser Development to Acquisition of Syntactic Knowledge , 2015 .

[61]  J. A. Dyke Interference effects from grammatically unavailable constituents during sentence processing. , 2007 .

[62]  Noam Chomsky Lectures on Government and Binding: The Pisa Lectures , 1993 .

[63]  Timothy F. Brady,et al.  A review of visual memory capacity: Beyond individual items and toward structured representations. , 2011, Journal of vision.

[64]  Shravan Vasishth,et al.  Similarity-based interference in sentence comprehension: Literature review and Bayesian meta-analysis , 2017 .

[65]  Dana McDaniel,et al.  The Processing and Acquisition of Control Structures by Young Children , 1990 .

[66]  Reiko Mazuka,et al.  Development of Executive Control and Language Processing , 2009, Lang. Linguistics Compass.

[67]  J. Mehler Some effects of grammatical transformations on the recall of english sentences , 1963 .

[68]  Shalom Zuckerman,et al.  A New Method for Testing Language Comprehension Reveals Better Performance on Passive and Principle B Constructions , 2016 .

[69]  N. Friedmann,et al.  The child heard a coordinated sentence and wondered: On children's difficulty in understanding coordination and relative clauses with crossing dependencies , 2010 .

[70]  B. Höhle,et al.  Impact of Context and Type of Referring Expression on Sentence Comprehension in German-Speaking Children , 2016 .

[71]  Firat Y. Testik,et al.  Breakup patterns for binary drop collisions , 2008, J. Vis..

[72]  M. Guasti,et al.  Number dissimilarities facilitate the comprehension of relative clauses in children with (Grammatical) Specific Language Impairment* , 2013, Journal of Child Language.

[73]  K. Deen,et al.  Children’s difficulty with raising: A performance account , 2016 .

[74]  E. Matthew Husband,et al.  Misinterpretations in agreement and agreement attraction , 2016, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[75]  Michael Tomasello,et al.  The discourse bases of relativization: An investigation of young German and English-speaking children's comprehension of relative clauses , 2009 .

[76]  S. Luck,et al.  On the role of selective attention in visual perception. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[77]  A. Belletti,et al.  Relativized relatives: Types of intervention in the acquisition of A-bar dependencies , 2009 .

[78]  J. S. Nairne A feature model of immediate memory , 1990, Memory & cognition.

[79]  S. Luck,et al.  Bridging the Gap between Monkey Neurophysiology and Human Perception: An Ambiguity Resolution Theory of Visual Selective Attention , 1997, Cognitive Psychology.

[80]  João Costa,et al.  Minimality beyond lexical restrictions: Processing and acquisition of free WH-dependencies in European portuguese , 2012 .

[81]  K. Bock,et al.  The Ties That Bind: Creating Number Agreement in Speech , 1999 .

[82]  D. Bates,et al.  Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4 , 2014, 1406.5823.

[83]  Kathleen M. Eberhard,et al.  The Accessibility of Conceptual Number to the Processes of Subject–Verb Agreement in English☆☆☆ , 1999 .

[84]  G. Vigliocco,et al.  When Sex and Syntax Go Hand in Hand: Gender Agreement in Language Production , 1999 .

[85]  Brian Butterworth,et al.  Constructing Subject-Verb Agreement in Speech: The Role of Semantic and Morphological Factors , 1995 .