Learning-related emotions in multimedia learning: An application of control-value theory

Abstract The present study investigated assumptions of Control-value Theory of Achievement Emotions in multimedia learning. By applying an experimental 2x2-factorial between-subject design, the factors learner control (high vs. low) and value induction (high vs. low) were systematically varied. Results showed that high learner control led to higher perceived control and higher learning outcomes. There were no main effects of value induction. Significant interaction effects showed that the group with induction of a high positive task value and high learner control had most positive learning-related emotions and highest learning outcomes. Serial mediation analyses revealed that the main effect of learner control on learning outcomes was serially mediated by perceived control, learning-related emotions, and use of cognitive resources. The interaction effect on learning outcomes was serially mediated by control and value appraisals, learning-related emotions, and use of cognitive resources, as well. In particular, the results of the serial mediation analyses support assumptions of Control-value Theory and its validity in an experimental setting.

[1]  Reinhard Pekrun,et al.  Academic Control and Action Control in the Achievement of College Students: A Longitudinal Field Study. , 2001 .

[2]  Roland Brünken,et al.  Emotional design and positive emotions in multimedia learning: An eyetracking study on the use of anthropomorphisms , 2015, Comput. Educ..

[3]  R. Pekrun.  The Control-Value Theory of Achievement Emotions: Assumptions, Corollaries, and Implications for Educational Research and Practice , 2006 .

[4]  Paul Ayres,et al.  The Impact of Persistent Pain on Working Memory and Learning , 2014 .

[5]  J. Reeve,et al.  Providing a Rationale in an Autonomy-Supportive Way as a Strategy to Motivate Others During an Uninteresting Activity , 2002 .

[6]  Slava Kalyuga.  Cognitive Load Theory: How Many Types of Load Does It Really Need? , 2011 .

[7]  T. Goetz,et al.  Academic emotions from a social-cognitive perspective: antecedents and domain specificity of students' affect in the context of Latin instruction. , 2006, The British journal of educational psychology.

[8]  A. Graesser,et al.  Dynamics of affective states during complex learning , 2012 .

[9]  L PlassJan,et al.  Emotional design and positive emotions in multimedia learning , 2015 .

[10]  P. Pintrich,et al.  Reliability and Predictive Validity of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (Mslq) , 1993 .

[11]  Sidney K. D'Mello,et al.  The influence of consequence value and text difficulty on affect, attention, and learning while reading instructional texts , 2015 .

[12]  Roland Brünken,et al.  Emotional text design in multimedia learning: A mixed-methods study using eye tracking , 2018, Comput. Educ..

[13]  Hyungshim Jang.  Supporting Students' Motivation, Engagement, and Learning During an Uninteresting Activity , 2008 .

[14]  Irene W. Y. Ma,et al.  Emotion, cognitive load and learning outcomes during simulation training , 2012, Medical education.

[15]  Anne C. Frenzel,et al.  Measuring emotions in students learning and performance: The Achievement Emotions Questionnaire (AE , 2011 .

[16]  A. Baddeley.  Working Memory, Thought, and Action , 2007 .

[17]  F. Paas,et al.  Effects of the Physical Environment on Cognitive Load and Learning: Towards a New Model of Cognitive Load , 2014 .

[18]  Dennis M. McInerney,et al.  Cross Cultural Model Testing: Inventory of School Motivation , 1991 .

[19]  T. Cameron Wild,et al.  Effects of Perceived Extrinsic Versus Intrinsic Teacher Motivation on Student Reactions to Skill Acquisition , 1992 .

[20]  T. Gog,et al.  Development of an instrument for measuring different types of cognitive load , 2013, Behavior Research Methods.

[21]  M. Orne.  On the social psychology of the psychological experiment: With particular reference to demand characteristics and their implications. , 1962 .

[22]  Chris S. Hulleman,et al.  Enhancing interest and performance with a utility value intervention. , 2010 .

[23]  Richard E. Mayer,et al.  Multimedia learning in an interactive self-explaining environment: What works in the design of agent , 2003 .

[24]  A. Hayes.  Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-Based Approach , 2013 .

[25]  R. Mayer,et al.  Benefits of emotional design in multimedia instruction , 2014 .

[26]  J. Russell.  Core affect and the psychological construction of emotion. , 2003, Psychological review.

[27]  Anne C. Frenzel,et al.  The Control-Value Theory of Achievement Emotions: An Integrative Approach to Emotions in Education , 2007 .

[28]  S. Schwan,et al.  The cognitive benefits of interactive videos: learning to tie nautical knots , 2004 .

[29]  Reinhard Pekrun,et al.  Control-Value Theory of Achievement Emotions , 2014 .

[30]  Roland Brünken,et al.  Cognitive and affective effects of seductive details in multimedia learning , 2015, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[31]  J. Sweller.  Element Interactivity and Intrinsic, Extraneous, and Germane Cognitive Load , 2010 .

[32]  Roland Brünken,et al.  Do Learner Characteristics Moderate the Seductive-Details-Effect? A Cognitive-Load-Study Using Eye-Tracking , 2015, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[33]  Richard E. Mayer,et al.  The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning: Cognitive Theory of Multimedia Learning , 2005 .

[34]  Roland Brünken,et al.  Cognitive and affective processes in multimedia learning , 2014 .

[35]  S. Hidi.  Interest, Reading, and Learning: Theoretical and Practical Considerations , 2001 .

[36]  Marcus Lee Johnson,et al.  Use of Task-Value Instructional Inductions for Facilitating Engagement and Conceptual Change. , 2013 .

[37]  Mark Sadoski,et al.  Imagery and Text: A Dual Coding Theory of Reading and Writing , 2000 .

[38]  J. Eccles,et al.  Motivational beliefs, values, and goals. , 2002, Annual review of psychology.

[39]  Roland Brünken,et al.  Learner characteristics and information processing in multimedia learning: A moderated mediation of the seductive details effect , 2016 .

[40]  Roland Brünken,et al.  Facilitators or suppressors: Effects of experimentally induced emotions on multimedia learning , 2016 .

[41]  Roland Brünken,et al.  The Rhythm Method: A New Method for Measuring Cognitive Load—An Experimental Dual‐Task Study , 2015 .

[42]  E. Deci,et al.  The "What" and "Why" of Goal Pursuits: Human Needs and the Self-Determination of Behavior , 2000 .

[43]  Roland Brünken,et al.  Differentiating Different Types of Cognitive Load: a Comparison of Different Measures , 2018 .

[44]  R. Mayer,et al.  Interactive Multimodal Learning Environments , 2007 .

[45]  Julia Müller,et al.  Emotional design in multimedia learning: Differentiation on relevant design features and their effects on emotions and learning , 2015, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[46]  Tina Seufert,et al.  Development and Validation of Two Instruments Measuring Intrinsic, Extraneous, and Germane Cognitive Load , 2017, Front. Psychol..

[47]  Slava Kalyuga,et al.  Cognitive load as a local characteristic of cognitive processes: Implications for measurement approaches , 2017 .

[48]  Katharina Scheiter.  The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning: The Learner Control Principle in Multimedia Learning , 2014 .

[49]  T. Goetz,et al.  Academic Emotions in Students' Self-Regulated Learning and Achievement: A Program of Qualitative and Quantitative Research , 2002 .

[50]  R. Mayer,et al.  When learning is just a click away: Does simple user interaction foster deeper understanding of multimedia messages? , 2001 .

[51]  R. Moreno.  Optimising learning from animations by minimising cognitive load: cognitive and affective consequences of signalling and segmentation methods , 2007 .

[52]  C. S. White,et al.  Effects of 'Seductive Details' on Macroprocessing and Microprocessing in Adults and Children , 1989 .

[53]  Richard E. Mayer,et al.  Cognitive Theory of Multimedia Learning , 2021, The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning.