Factors affecting employee knowledge acquisition and application capabilities

Purpose – The paper aims to analyze the influences of organizational context and information technology (IT) applications on employees' perceptions of knowledge acquisition and application capabilities in five public and five private sector organizations in South Korea.Design/methodology/approach – The paper analyzes how employees' perceptions of organizational context and IT affect employee knowledge acquisition and application capabilities in five public and five private sector organizations in South Korea. It discusses the results of regression analyses based on a survey of 322 public and private employees that explored their perceptions of organizational vision and goals, social networks, centralization, performance‐based reward systems, the usage of IT applications, and knowledge acquisition and application capabilities.Findings – The results of a survey of public and private employees show that clear organizational vision and goals, social networks, and employee usage of IT applications are all posi...

[1]  Gabriel Szulanski Exploring internal stickiness: Impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm , 1996 .

[2]  M. Broadbent Measuring business performance , 1999 .

[3]  L. Argote,et al.  Learning Curves in Manufacturing , 1990, Science.

[4]  Judith Jordan,et al.  Knowledge orientations and team effectiveness , 1998 .

[5]  Fred D. Davis Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology , 1989, MIS Q..

[6]  Carla O'Dell,et al.  If Only We Knew What We Know: Identification and Transfer of Internal Best Practices , 1998 .

[7]  P. Drucker Post-Capitalist Society , 1993 .

[8]  Melissa M. Appleyard,et al.  HOW DOES KNOWLEDGE FLOW? INTERFIRM PATTERNS IN THE SEMICONDUCTOR INDUSTRY , 1996 .

[9]  Albert H. Segars,et al.  Knowledge Management: An Organizational Capabilities Perspective , 2001, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[10]  L. Argote,et al.  KNOWLEDGE TRANSFER: A BASIS FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE IN FIRMS , 2000 .

[11]  D. Teece Capturing Value from Knowledge Assets: The New Economy, Markets for Know-How, and Intangible Assets , 1998 .

[12]  M. Polanyi Chapter 7 – The Tacit Dimension , 1997 .

[13]  S. Kiesler,et al.  The kindness of strangers: on the usefulness of electronic weak ties for technical advice , 1996 .

[14]  Lewis M. Branscomb,et al.  Ease of Use: A System Design Challenge , 1984, IBM Syst. J..

[15]  E. A. Locke,et al.  Participation in Decision-Making: One More Look , 1979 .

[16]  R. Grant Toward a Knowledge-Based Theory of the Firm,” Strategic Management Journal (17), pp. , 1996 .

[17]  J. Cook,et al.  New work attitude measures of trust, organizational commitment and personal need non‐fulfilment , 1980 .

[18]  W. Starbuck Learning by Knowledge-Intensive Firms , 1992 .

[19]  R. E. Miles,et al.  Trust in organizations: A conceptual framework linking organizational forms, managerial philosophies, and the opportunity costs of controls. , 1996 .

[20]  Kathleen Shearer,et al.  Understanding knowledge management and information management: the need for an empirical perspective , 2002, Inf. Res..

[21]  R. Thorpe,et al.  Using Knowledge within Small and Medium-Sized Firms: A Systematic Review of the Evidence , 2005 .

[22]  S. Pan,et al.  Knowledge Management in Practice: An Exploratory Case Study , 1999 .

[23]  Anthony J. DiBella,et al.  How Organizations Learn: An Integrated Strategy for Building Learning Capability , 1997 .

[24]  A. Bennet,et al.  The Rise of the Knowledge Organization , 2004 .

[25]  Paul Almeida,et al.  Knowledge sourcing by foreign multinationals: Patent citation analysis in the U.S. semiconductor industry , 1996 .

[26]  P. Klahr,et al.  Managing Customer Support Knowledge , 1998 .

[27]  R. Hall Organizations: Structures, Processes, and Outcomes , 1987 .

[28]  M. Aiken,et al.  Relationship of centralization to other structural properties. , 1967 .

[29]  Mark F. Peterson,et al.  A Test of Participation Theory in a Work Re-design Field Setting: Degree of Participation and Comparison Site Contrasts , 1989 .

[30]  Julian Birkinshaw,et al.  Knowledge transfer in international acquisitions , 1999 .

[31]  H. D. Thomas,et al.  SUCCESSFUL KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT PROJECTS , 1998 .

[32]  G. Huber Organizational Learning: The Contributing Processes and the Literatures , 1991 .

[33]  B. Lloyd,et al.  The Future of Capitalism , 1996 .

[34]  William R. Truran,et al.  Pathways for Knowledge: How Companies Learn Through People , 1998 .

[35]  B. Kogut,et al.  Knowledge of the Firm, Combinative Capabilities, and the Replication of Technology , 1992 .

[36]  D. Leonard,et al.  The Role of Tacit Knowledge in Group Innovation , 1998 .

[37]  Sharon F. Matusik,et al.  The Utilization of Contingent Work, Knowledge Creation, and Competitive Advantage , 1998 .

[38]  Jonathan D. Pemberton,et al.  Learning and knowledge management in the intelligent organisation , 1999 .

[39]  Jeffrey Pfeffer,et al.  Knowing "What" to Do Is Not Enough: Turning Knowledge into Action , 1999 .

[40]  Omar E. M. Khalil,et al.  Knowledge Management and organizational Performance in the Egyptian software Firms , 2007, Int. J. Knowl. Manag..

[41]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  The myopia of learning , 1993 .

[42]  Irwin L. Goldstein,et al.  Training in Organizations , 2001 .

[43]  Andrew C. Inkpen,et al.  Knowledge Management Processes and International Joint Ventures , 1998 .

[44]  Max D. Hopper Rattling SABRE—new ways to compete on information , 1990 .

[45]  H. Rainey Understanding and Managing Public Organizations , 1991 .

[46]  Dorothy E. Leidner,et al.  Review: Knowledge Management and Knowledge Management Systems: Conceptual Foundations and Research Issues , 2001, MIS Q..

[47]  William R. King,et al.  Integrating Knowledge Management Into is Strategy , 1999, Inf. Syst. Manag..

[48]  Dan Holtshouse Knowledge Research Issues , 1998 .

[49]  R. Kanter,et al.  The Challenge of organizational change : how companies experience it and leaders guide it , 1993 .

[50]  M. Gordon,et al.  PUBLICATION RECORDS AND TENURE DECISIONS IN THE FIELD OF STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT , 1996 .

[51]  K. M. Bartol,et al.  Encouraging Knowledge Sharing: The Role of Organizational Reward Systems , 2002 .

[52]  Thomas H. Davenport,et al.  Book review:Working knowledge: How organizations manage what they know. Thomas H. Davenport and Laurence Prusak. Harvard Business School Press, 1998. $29.95US. ISBN 0‐87584‐655‐6 , 1998 .

[53]  I. Nonaka A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation , 1994 .

[54]  Dorothy E. Leidner,et al.  Knowledge Management Systems: Issues, Challenges, and Benefits , 1999, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[55]  S. Zahra,et al.  Absorptive Capacity: A Review, Reconceptualization, and Extension , 2002 .

[56]  R. Ruggles The State of the Notion: Knowledge Management in Practice , 1998 .

[57]  T. Davenport,et al.  Improving Knowledge Work Processes , 1996 .

[58]  Irwin L. Goldstein,et al.  Training in organizations: Needs assessment, development, and evaluation , 1986 .

[59]  I. Nonaka,et al.  How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation , 1995 .

[60]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY: A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON LEARNING AND INNOVATION , 1990 .

[61]  Salleh Yahya,et al.  Managing human resources toward achieving knowledge management , 2002, J. Knowl. Manag..

[62]  L. Argote Organizational Learning: Creating, Retaining and Transferring Knowledge , 1999 .

[63]  E. Autio,et al.  SOCIAL CAPITAL, KNOWLEDGE ACQUISITION, AND KNOWLEDGE EXPLOITATION IN YOUNG TECHNOLOGY-BASED FIRMS , 2001 .

[64]  D. Teece Strategies for Managing Knowledge Assets: the Role of Firm Structure and Industrial Context , 2000 .