Mechanical and failure properties of single attached cells under compression.

Eukaryotic cells are continuously subjected to mechanical forces under normal physiological conditions. These forces and associated cellular deformations induce a variety of biological processes. The degree of deformation depends on the mechanical properties of the cell. As most cells are anchorage dependent for normal functioning, it is important to study the mechanical properties of cells in their attached configuration. The goal of the present study was to obtain the mechanical and failure properties of attached cells. Individual, attached C2C12 mouse myoblasts were subjected to unconfined compression experiments using a recently developed loading device. The device allows global compression of the cell until cell rupture and simultaneously measures the associated forces. Cell bursting was characterized by a typical reduction in the force, referred to as the bursting force. Mean bursting forces were calculated as 8.7+/-2.5 microN at an axial strain of 72+/-4%. Visualization of the cell using confocal microscopy revealed that cell bursting was preceded by the formation of bulges at the cell membrane, which eventually led to rupturing of the cell membrane. Finite element calculations were performed to simulate the obtained force-deformation curves. A finite element mesh was built for each cell to account for its specific geometrical features. Using an axisymmetric approximation of the cell geometry, and a Neo-Hookean constitutive model, excellent agreement between predicted and measured force-deformation curves was obtained, yielding an average Young's modulus of 1.14+/-0.32 kPa.

[1]  William E Kraus,et al.  Apparent elastic modulus and hysteresis of skeletal muscle cells throughout differentiation. , 2002, American journal of physiology. Cell physiology.

[2]  G I Zahalak,et al.  Cell poking. Determination of the elastic area compressibility modulus of the erythrocyte membrane. , 1984, Biophysical journal.

[3]  J-F Stoltz,et al.  From biomechanics to mechanobiology. , 2002, Biorheology.

[4]  M Grattarola,et al.  Mechanical and morphological properties of living 3T6 cells probed via scanning force microscopy , 1997, Microscopy research and technique.

[5]  W. R. Jones,et al.  Alterations in the Young's modulus and volumetric properties of chondrocytes isolated from normal and osteoarthritic human cartilage. , 1999, Journal of biomechanics.

[6]  Jean-Jacques Meister,et al.  Changes in the mechanical properties of fibroblasts during spreading: a micromanipulation study , 1999, European Biophysics Journal.

[7]  D E Ingber,et al.  Control of cytoskeletal mechanics by extracellular matrix, cell shape, and mechanical tension. , 1994, Biophysical journal.

[8]  K. Obermayer,et al.  Correction methods for three-dimensional reconstructions from confocal images: I. tissue shrinking and axial scaling , 2000, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[9]  Cwj Cees Oomens,et al.  Monitoring the biomechanical response of individual cells under compression: A new compression device , 2003, Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing.

[10]  H. Hägerstrand,et al.  Amphiphile-induced spherical microexovesicle corresponds to an extreme local area difference between two monolayers of the membrane bilayer , 2006, Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing.

[11]  G M Artmann,et al.  Micropipette aspiration of human erythrocytes induces echinocytes via membrane phospholipid translocation. , 1997, Biophysical journal.

[12]  B. Rubinsky,et al.  Viability of deformed cells. , 1999, Cryobiology.

[13]  R M Nerem,et al.  Application of the micropipette technique to the measurement of cultured porcine aortic endothelial cell viscoelastic properties. , 1990, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[14]  P. A. Watson,et al.  Function follows form: generation of intracellular signals by cell deformation , 1991, FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology.

[15]  K Athanasiou,et al.  Cytoindentation for obtaining cell biomechanical properties , 1999, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[16]  D Stamenović,et al.  A tensegrity model of the cytoskeleton in spread and round cells. , 1998, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[17]  D L Bader,et al.  Deformation properties of articular chondrocytes: a critique of three separate techniques. , 2002, Biorheology.

[18]  Michael A. Ferenczi,et al.  A micromanipulation technique with a theoretical cell model for determining mechanical properties of single mammalian cells , 1992 .

[19]  M. Bobrowska-Hägerstrand,et al.  Membrane skeleton detachment in spherical and cylindrical microexovesicles , 1999, Bulletin of mathematical biology.

[20]  R M Nerem,et al.  The application of a homogeneous half-space model in the analysis of endothelial cell micropipette measurements. , 1988, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[21]  Cees W J Oomens,et al.  Predicting local cell deformations in engineered tissue constructs: a multilevel finite element approach. , 2002, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[22]  S. Hell,et al.  Aberrations in confocal fluorescence microscopy induced by mismatches in refractive index , 1993 .

[23]  Cees W J Oomens,et al.  Monitoring local cell viability in engineered tissues: a fast, quantitative, and nondestructive approach. , 2003, Tissue engineering.

[24]  D E Ingber,et al.  Tensegrity and mechanoregulation: from skeleton to cytoskeleton. , 1999, Osteoarthritis and cartilage.

[25]  M. Long,et al.  Comparison of the viscoelastic properties of normal hepatocytes and hepatocellular carcinoma cells under cytoskeletal perturbation. , 2000, Biorheology.

[26]  H. Takamatsu,et al.  Survival of biological cells deformed in a narrow gap. , 2002, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[27]  N O Petersen,et al.  Dependence of locally measured cellular deformability on position on the cell, temperature, and cytochalasin B. , 1982, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[28]  D. A. Lee,et al.  Compressive Deformation and Damage of Muscle Cell Subpopulations in a Model System , 2001, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[29]  Zhibing Zhang,et al.  A novel technique for the study of bacterial cell mechanical properties , 1999 .

[30]  Shih-Chun Liu,et al.  Separation of the lipid bilayer from the membrane skeleton during discocyte-echinocyte transformation of human erythrocyte ghosts. , 1989, European journal of cell biology.

[31]  C. Oomens,et al.  The etiology of pressure ulcers: skin deep or muscle bound? , 2003, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[32]  B. Isomaa,et al.  Influence of band 3 protein absence and skeletal structures on amphiphile- and Ca(2+)-induced shape alterations in erythrocytes: a study with lamprey (Lampetra fluviatilis), trout (Onchorhynchus mykiss) and human erythrocytes. , 2000, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[33]  W. Kraus,et al.  Endothelial, cardiac muscle and skeletal muscle exhibit different viscous and elastic properties as determined by atomic force microscopy. , 2001, Journal of biomechanics.

[34]  N. Caille,et al.  Contribution of the nucleus to the mechanical properties of endothelial cells. , 2002, Journal of biomechanics.

[35]  K. Bathe.  Finite Element Procedures , 1995 .

[36]  V Kralj-Iglic,et al.  Stable tubular microexovesicles of the erythrocyte membrane induced by dimeric amphiphiles. , 2000, Physical review. E, Statistical physics, plasmas, fluids, and related interdisciplinary topics.

[37]  Kyriacos A Athanasiou,et al.  Creep indentation of single cells. , 2003, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[38]  O. Thoumine,et al.  Comparison of the mechanical properties of normal and transformed fibroblasts. , 1997, Biorheology.

[39]  M. Ferenczi,et al.  A novel micromanipulation technique for measuring the bursting strength of single mammalian cells , 1991, Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology.