One of the most challenging aspects of developing human space launch and exploration systems is minimizing and mitigating the many potential risk factors to ensure the safest possible design while also meeting the required cost, weight, and performance criteria. In order to accomplish this, effective risk analyses and trade studies are needed to identify key risk drivers, dependencies, and sensitivities as the design evolves. The Engineering Risk Assessment (ERA) team at NASA Ames Research Center (ARC) develops advanced risk analysis approaches, models, and tools to provide such meaningful risk and reliability data throughout vehicle development. The goal of the project presented in this memorandum is to design a generic launch 7 vehicle and spacecraft architecture that can be used to develop and demonstrate these new risk analysis techniques without relying on other proprietary or sensitive vehicle designs. To accomplish this, initial spacecraft and launch vehicle (LV) designs were established using historical sizing relationships for a mission delivering four crewmembers and equipment to the International Space Station (ISS). Mass-estimating relationships (MERs) were used to size the crew capsule and launch vehicle, and a combination of optimization techniques and iterative design processes were employed to determine a possible two-stage-to-orbit (TSTO) launch trajectory into a 350-kilometer orbit. Primary subsystems were also designed for the crewed capsule architecture, based on a 24-hour on-orbit mission with a 7-day contingency. Safety analysis was also performed to identify major risks to crew survivability and assess the system's overall reliability. These procedures and analyses validate that the architecture's basic design and performance are reasonable to be used for risk trade studies. While the vehicle designs presented are not intended to represent a viable architecture, they will provide a valuable initial platform for developing and demonstrating innovative risk assessment capabilities.
[1]
Howard D. Curtis,et al.
Orbital Mechanics for Engineering Students
,
2005
.
[2]
Erik Seedhouse,et al.
SpaceX: Making Commercial Spaceflight a Reality
,
2013
.
[3]
Steven Siceloff.
Commercial Crew Program
,
2015
.
[4]
John A. Christian,et al.
The Sensor Test for Orion RelNav Risk Mitigation (STORRM) Development Test Objective
,
2011
.
[5]
James L. Reuter,et al.
International Space Station Environmental Control and Life Support System Status: 2000–2001
,
2001
.
[6]
Wiley J. Larson,et al.
Human spaceflight : mission analysis and design
,
2007
.
[7]
Petra Koenig,et al.
Elements Of Spacecraft Design
,
2016
.
[8]
Waldy K. Sjauw,et al.
Comparison of Implicit Integration Methods for Solving Aerospace Trajectory Optimization Problems
,
2006
.
[9]
Anil V. Rao,et al.
Algorithm 902: GPOPS, A MATLAB software for solving multiple-phase optimal control problems using the gauss pseudospectral method
,
2010,
TOMS.
[10]
James R. Wertz,et al.
Space mission engineering : the new SMAD
,
2011
.
[11]
Howard E. Goldstein,et al.
Performance of uncoated AFRSI blankets during multiple Space Shuttle flights
,
1992
.
[12]
Ryan A. Stephan.
Overview of NASA's Thermal Control System Development for Exploration Project
,
2009
.
[13]
Christopher J. Damaren,et al.
Spacecraft Dynamics and Control: An Introduction
,
2013
.
[14]
Nino L. Bonavito,et al.
Orbital and Celestial Mechanics
,
1998
.