Doing which work? A practice approach to institutional pluralism

This chapter takes a social theory of practice approach to examining institutional work; that is, how institutions are created, maintained, and disrupted through the actions, interactions, and negotiations of multiple actors. We examine alternative approaches that organizations use to deal with institutional pluralism based on a longitudinal real-time case study of a utility company grappling with opposing market and regulatory logics over time. These two logics required the firm to both mitigate its significant market power and also maintain its commercially competitive focus and responsiveness to shareholders. Institutional theorists have long acknowledged that institutions have a central logic (Friedland & Alford, 1991) or rationality (DiMaggio & Powell, 1983; Scott, 1995/2001; Townley, 2002), comprising a set of material and symbolic practices and organizing principles that provide logics of action for organizations and individuals, who then reproduce the institutions through their actions (Glynn & Lounsbury, 2005; Suddaby & Greenwood, 2005). Despite a monolithic feel to much institutional theory, in which a dominant institutional logic appears to prevail, institutional theorists also acknowledge the plurality of institutions (e.g. Friedland & Alford, 1991; Kraatz & Block, 2008; Lounsbury, 2007; Meyer & Rowan, 1977; Whittington, 1992). While these pluralistic institutions may be interdependent, they are not considered to coexist in harmony; “There is no question but that many competing and inconsistent logics exist in modern society” (Scott, 1995: 130).

[1]  Philip Selznick.  TVA and the grass roots , 1949 .

[2]  Jean-Louis Denis,et al.  Strategizing in pluralistic contexts: Rethinking theoretical frames , 2007 .

[3]  C. Hardy.  PLURALISM, POWER AND COLLEGIALITY IN UNIVERSITIES , 1991 .

[4]  M. Lounsbury.  A Tale of Two Cities: Competing Logics and Practice Variation In the Professionalizing of Mutual Funds , 2007 .

[5]  Matthew S. Kraatz,et al.  Organizational Implications of Institutional Pluralism , 2008 .

[6]  Michael Lounsbury,et al.  From the Critics' Corner: Logic Blending, Discursive Change and Authenticity in a Cultural Production System , 2005 .

[7]  S. Barley.  Technology as an occasion for structuring: evidence from observations of CT scanners and the social order of radiology departments. , 1986, Administrative science quarterly.

[8]  R. Greenwood,et al.  Theorizing Change: The Role of Professional Associations in the Transformation of Institutionalized Fields , 2002 .

[9]  W. Richard Scott,et al.  Institutional Change and Healthcare Organizations: From Professional Dominance to Managed Care , 2000 .

[10]  Andreas Reckwitz.  Toward a Theory of Social Practices , 2002 .

[11]  C. Geertz.  The interpretation of cultures / Clifford Geertz , 1973 .

[12]  David C. Wilson,et al.  Thinking and acting strategically: new challenges for interrogating strategy , 2004 .

[13]  J. Child.  Strategic Choice in the Analysis of Action, Structure, Organizations and Environment: Retrospect and Prospect , 1997 .

[14]  A. V. D. Ven,et al.  Using Paradox to Build Management and Organization Theories , 1989 .

[15]  W. Powell,et al.  The iron cage revisited institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields , 1983 .

[16]  John W. Meyer,et al.  Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony , 1977, American Journal of Sociology.

[17]  P. Lawrence,et al.  Organization and Environment: Managing Differentiation and Integration , 1967 .

[18]  A. V. D. Ven,et al.  Suggestions for studying strategy process: A research note , 1992 .

[19]  W. Orlikowski.  Using Technology and Constituting Structures: A Practice Lens for Studying Technology in Organizations , 2000 .

[20]  A. Michael Huberman,et al.  An expanded sourcebook qualitative data analysis , 1994 .

[21]  Jeffrey Pfeffer,et al.  Power and Politics in Organizations: The Social Psychology of Conflict, Coalitions, and Bargaining.@@@Power in Organizations. , 1982 .

[22]  W. Scott,et al.  Institutions and Organizations. , 1995 .

[23]  Petter Holm.  The Dynamics of Institutionalization: Transformation Processes in Norwegian Fisheries , 1995 .

[24]  R. Greenwood,et al.  Understanding Radical Organizational Change: Bringing Together the Old and the New Institutionalism , 1996 .

[25]  Carol M. Werner,et al.  Temporal qualities of relationships: Organismic, transactional, and dialectical views , 1994 .

[26]  Peter A. Clark,et al.  Organizations in Action: Competition between Contexts , 1999 .

[27]  M. Porter.  Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance , 1985 .

[28]  Mustafa Emirbayer,et al.  What Is Agency?1 , 1998, American Journal of Sociology.

[29]  C. Oliver.  STRATEGIC RESPONSES TO INSTITUTIONAL PROCESSES , 1991 .

[30]  T. Lawrence,et al.  From Moby Dick to Free Willy: Macro-Cultural Discourse and Institutional Entrepreneurship in Emerging Institutional Fields , 2004 .

[31]  R. Evered,et al.  Alternative Perspectives in the Organizational Sciences: “Inquiry from the Inside” and “Inquiry from the Outside” , 1981 .

[32]  David J. Cooper,et al.  Business Planning as Pedagogy: Language and Control in a Changing Institutional Field , 1998 .

[33]  Sherry B. Ortner.  Theory in Anthropology since the Sixties , 1984, Comparative Studies in Society and History.

[34]  W. Creed,et al.  Institutional Contradictions, Praxis, and Institutional Change: A Dialectical Perspective , 2002 .

[35]  Robert Chia,et al.  On Organizational Becoming: Rethinking Organizational Change , 2002, Organ. Sci..

[36]  Peter Miller,et al.  Accounting as social and institutional practice , 1996 .

[37]  E. Shils.  The Constitution Of Society , 1982 .

[38]  R. Friedland.  Bringing Society Back In : Symbols, Practices, and Institutional Contradictions , 1991 .

[39]  T. Reay,et al.  The Recomposition of an Organizational Field: Health Care in Alberta , 2005 .

[40]  R. Whittington.  PUTTING GIDDENS INTO ACTION: SOCIAL SYSTEMS AND MANAGERIAL AGENCY , 1992 .

[41]  A. V. D. Ven.  SUGGESTIONS FOR STUDYING STRATEGY PROCESS: A RESEARCH NOTE , 1992 .

[42]  Stephen Turner,et al.  The Social Theory of Practices: Tradition, Tacit Knowledge and Presuppositions , 1996 .

[43]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Knowing in practice: Enacting a collective capability in distributed organizing , 2002, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[44]  T. G.,et al.  Logic in Practice , 1934, Nature.

[45]  P. Jarzabkowski.  Strategy as Practice: An Activity Based Approach , 2005 .

[46]  R. Greenwood,et al.  Sedimentation and Transformation in Organizational Change: The Case of Canadian Law Firms , 1996 .

[47]  M. Archer,et al.  Realist Social Theory: The Morphogenetic Approach , 1997 .

[48]  Martin Brigham,et al.  The Utility of Social Obligations in the UK Energy Industry , 2007 .

[49]  A. Pettigrew.  Longitudinal Field Research on Change: Theory and Practice , 1990 .

[50]  A. V. D. Ven,et al.  A Collective Action Model of Institutional Innovation , 2006 .

[51]  M. Russo.  Institutions, Exchange Relations, and the Emergence of New Fields: Regulatory Policies and Independent Power Production in America, 1978–1992 , 2001 .

[52]  Paula Jarzabkowski,et al.  Strategizing and organizing in pluralistic contexts , 2006 .

[53]  Book Review: Organisations in Action. Competition Between Contexts , 2002 .

[54]  P. Sztompka,et al.  Society in Action: The Theory of Social Becoming , 1991 .

[55]  R. Whittington.  Completing the Practice Turn in Strategy Research , 2006 .

[56]  R. Greenwood,et al.  Rhetorical Strategies of Legitimacy , 2005 .

[57]  M. Friedman.  The Social Responsibility of Business Is to Increase Its Profits , 2007 .

[58]  Barbara Townley,et al.  The Role of Competing Rationalities in Institutional Change , 2002 .

[59]  P. Jarzabkowski.  Strategy as Practice: Recursiveness, Adaptation, and Practices-in-Use , 2004 .

[60]  Jean Hartley,et al.  Case study research , 2004 .

[61]  Stewart Clegg,et al.  Some dare call it power , 2006 .

[62]  Pamela S. Tolbert,et al.  Institutionalization and Structuration: Studying the Links between Action and Institution , 1997 .

[63]  Charles E. Lindblom,et al.  The intelligence of democracy : decision making through mutual adjustment , 1965 .

[64]  Stewart Clegg,et al.  Frameworks of power , 1989 .

[65]  A. Langley.  Strategies for Theorizing from Process Data , 1999 .

[66]  P. Jarzabkowski,et al.  Strategizing: The challenges of a practice perspective , 2007 .

[67]  J. Kenneth Benson,et al.  Organizations: A Dialectical View. , 1977 .

[68]  Richard Whittington,et al.  Strategies and Institutions: A Pluralistic Account of Strategies in the Taiwanese Computer Industry , 1997 .

[69]  T. Lawrence,et al.  Institutions and Institutional Work , 2006 .

[70]  A. Giddens.  The Constitution of Society , 1985 .

[71]  Thomas B. Lawrence,et al.  Territoriality in Organizations , 2005 .

[72]  Mark C. Suchman.  Managing Legitimacy: Strategic and Institutional Approaches , 1995 .

[73]  K. K. Cetina,et al.  The Practice Turn in Contemporary Theory , 2001 .

[74]  K. Eisenhardt.  Building theories from case study research , 1989, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[75]  T. Zilber.  The Work of the Symbolic in Institutional Processes: Translations of Rational Myths in Israeli High Tech , 2006 .