The City and the Bottom Line: Urban Megaprojects and the Privatization of Planning in Southeast Asia

Prevailing perspectives on the impacts of globalization on urban form in large, globalizing cities in Asia hold that these cities are experiencing an inexorable process of ‘Westernization’ or ‘Americanization’. Yet this focus on convergence distracts us from the task of analyzing urban change and its causes, leading to analytical muddiness and awkward planning and policy implications. The author presents an alternative framework that focuses on actor-centered analysis, and the importance of understanding historical context. This framework is employed in a case study of recent trends in urban development in Metro Manila, based on interviews, government, private sector, and nonprofit sector documents, and newspapers. It is concluded that, in Metro Manila, a defining characteristic of contemporary urban development is the unprecedented privatization of urban and regional planning. Large developers have conceived of urban development plans on a metrowide scale, and begun to implement these with the assistance of government. This phenomenon has its roots in the historical development of social groups in the Philippines and their shifting interests with the globalization of the Philippine economy. The author concludes that the privatization of planning raises distinct issues for urban planning theory and practice.

[1]  Prostitution In Nevada,et al.  ANNALS of the Association of American Geographers , 1974 .

[2]  Manuel A. Caoili.  The Origins of Metropolitan Manila: A Political and Social Analysis , 1989 .

[3]  Terry McGee,et al.  The emergence of desakota regions in Asia: expanding a hypothesis , 1991 .

[4]  East-West Environment,et al.  The Extended Metropolis: Settlement Transition in Asia , 1991, The Journal of Asian Studies.

[5]  J. Boyce.  The Political Economy of Growth and Impoverishment in the Marcos Era , 1994, The Journal of Asian Studies.

[6]  Breaking through : the struggle within the Communist Party of the Philippines , 1994 .

[7]  H. Dick,et al.  Beyond the Third World City: The New Urban Geography of South-east Asia , 1998 .

[8]  M. Dear,et al.  “Postmodern Urbanism” , 2020, The Urban Geography Reader.

[9]  P. Hutchcroft,et al.  Booty Capitalism: The Politics of Banking in the Philippines , 1999, The Journal of Asian Studies.

[10]  Pacific Rim cities: the relationship between planning systems, property markets and real estate investment , 1999 .

[11]  Jonathan V. Beaverstock,et al.  A roster of world cities , 1999 .

[12]  Entrepreneurship, consumption, ethnicity and national identity in the making of the Philippines' new rich , 1999 .

[13]  J. Sidel.  Capital, Coercion, and Crime: Bossism in the Philippines , 1999 .

[14]  B. Yeoh.  Global/globalizing cities , 1999, Progress in human geography.

[15]  Teofilo C. Daquila.  Booty Capitalism: The Politics of Banking in the Philippines , 1999 .

[16]  Jim Berry,et al.  Cities in the Pacific Rim : planning systems and property markets , 1999 .

[17]  The urban land and real estate market in Metro Manila : a socio-economic analysis , 2000 .

[18]  Stephen Graham,et al.  CONSTRUCTING PREMIUM NETWORK SPACES: REFLECTIONS ON INFRASTRUCTURE NETWORKS AND CONTEMPORARY URBAN DEVELOPMENT. IN: MOVING PEOPLE, GOODS, AND INFORMATION IN THE 21ST CENTURY: THE CUTTING-EDGE INFRASTRUCTURES OF NETWORKED CITIES , 2000 .

[19]  Culture and privilege in capitalist Asia , 2000 .

[20]  Hendrik Meert.  Globalizing cities: a New Spatial Order? , 2001 .

[21]  E. Soja,et al.  Global city regions , 2001 .

[22]  S. Sassen.  Global Cities and Developmentalist States: How to Derail What Could Be an Interesting Debate: A Response to Hill and Kim , 2001 .

[23]  Allen J. Scott,et al.  Global City-Regions: Trends, Theory, Policy , 2001 .

[24]  Kong Chong Ho,et al.  Critical Reflections on Cities in Southeast Asia , 2002, Critical Reflections on Cities in Southeast Asia.

[25]  Richard Marshall,et al.  Emerging Urbanity: Global Urban Projects in the Asia Pacific Rim , 2002 .

[26]  Jennifer Robinson,et al.  Global and world cities: a view from off the map , 2002 .

[27]  K. Olds.  Globalization and Urban Change: Capital, Culture, and Pacific Rim Mega-Projects , 2002 .

[28]  P. Pírez.  Buenos Aires: fragmentation and privatization of the metropolitan city , 2002 .

[29]  N. Smith.  New Globalism, New Urbanism: Gentrification as Global Urban Strategy , 2002 .

[30]  G. Llanto.  Infrastructure development : experience and policy options for the future , 2002 .

[31]  E. Sajor.  Globalization and the Urban Property Boom in Metro Cebu, Philippines , 2003 .

[32]  Dilip Ratha,et al.  Workers’ Remittances: An Important and Stable Source of External Development Finance , 2003 .

[33]  J. Nasr,et al.  Urbanism : Imported or Exported ? Native Aspirations and Foreign Plans , 2003 .

[34]  B. Graizbord,et al.  Mexico City as a peripheral global player: The two sides of the coin , 2003 .

[35]  T. Firman.  New town development in Jakarta Metropolitan Region: a perspective of spatial segregation , 2004 .

[36]  The Work of Forgetting and Remembering Places , 2004 .

[37]  Rodrigo Salcedo,et al.  Gated Communities in Santiago: Wall or Frontier? , 2004 .

[38]  Migration and development: the Philippine experience , 2004 .

[39]  R. Hill.  Cities and nested hierarchies , 2004 .

[40]  The rise of “foreign gated communities” in Beijing: between economic globalization and local institutions , 2004 .

[41]  S. Chiu,et al.  Testing the Global City-Social Polarisation Thesis: Hong Kong since the 1990s , 2004 .

[42]  William Solecki,et al.  Critical Surveys Edited by STEPHEN ROPER , 2005 .

[43]  F. Erkip,et al.  The Rise of the Shopping Mall in Turkey: the Use and Appeal of a Mall in Ankara , 2005 .

[44]  Walden Bello,et al.  The Anti-Development State: The Political Economy of Permanent Crisis in the Philippines , 2005 .

[45]  S. Roper,et al.  Exporting the American Dream: The Globalization of Suburban Consumption Landscapes , 2005 .