Social connectedness and mortality after prostate cancer diagnosis: A prospective cohort study

Men with prostate cancer experience side effects for which a supportive social environment may be beneficial. We examined the association between four measures of social connectedness and mortality after a prostate cancer diagnosis. Male participants in the Melbourne Collaborative Cohort Study in 1990–1994, who developed incident prostate cancer and attended follow‐up in 2003–2007, were eligible for the study. Information on social connectedness, collected at follow‐up, included (i) living arrangement; (ii) frequency of visits to friends/relatives and (iii) from friends/relatives; (iv) weekly hours of social activities. A total of 1,421 prostate cancer cases was observed (338 all‐cause deaths, 113 from prostate cancer), including 867 after follow‐up (150 all‐cause deaths, 55 from prostate cancer) and 554 before follow‐up (188 all‐cause deaths, 58 from prostate cancer). Cox models stratified by tumour Gleason score and stage, and sequentially adjusted for socioeconomic, health‐ and lifestyle‐related confounders, were used to calculate hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) for the association between social connectedness and all‐cause mortality after prostate cancer. Men who reported living alone before diagnosis had higher overall mortality (HR = 1.6, 95% CI: 1.0–2.5), after adjustment for socioeconomic, health and lifestyle confounders. Lower mortality was observed for men with more social activities (p‐trend = 0.07), but not in comprehensively adjusted models. Consistent with these findings, men living alone after prostate cancer diagnosis had higher mortality (HR = 1.3, 95% CI: 0.9–1.9). Lower mortality was observed with increasing socializing hours in the age‐adjusted model (p‐trend = 0.06) but not after more comprehensive adjustment. Our findings suggest that living with someone, but not other aspects of social connectedness, may be associated with decreased mortality for men with prostate cancer.

[1]  D. English,et al.  Cohort Profile: The Melbourne Collaborative Cohort Study (Health 2020). , 2017, International journal of epidemiology.

[2]  Di Shao,et al.  Brief psychological intervention in patients with cervical cancer: A randomized controlled trial. , 2016, Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association.

[3]  J. Aitken,et al.  Partner status and survival after cancer: A competing risks analysis. , 2016, Cancer epidemiology.

[4]  A. Sjölander,et al.  The roles of stress and social support in prostate cancer mortality , 2016, Scandinavian journal of urology.

[5]  C. Carver,et al.  Long‐term psychological benefits of cognitive‐behavioral stress management for women with breast cancer: 11‐year follow‐up of a randomized controlled trial , 2015, Cancer.

[6]  T. Moore,et al.  Prostate cancer and supportive care: a systematic review and qualitative synthesis of men's experiences and unmet needs , 2015, European journal of cancer care.

[7]  C. Heckler,et al.  The association between partner support and psychological distress among prostate cancer survivors in a nationwide study , 2015, Journal of Cancer Survivorship.

[8]  Ming-Hui Chen,et al.  Marital status and survival in patients with cancer. , 2013, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[9]  Neil Pearce,et al.  Commentary: Representativeness is usually not necessary and often should be avoided. , 2013, International journal of epidemiology.

[10]  M. Humphreys,et al.  Marital status and prostate cancer outcomes. , 2013, The Canadian journal of urology.

[11]  M. Menon,et al.  Marital status: a gender‐independent risk factor for poorer survival after radical cystectomy , 2012 .

[12]  K. Bae,et al.  Impact of marital status and race on outcomes of patients enrolled in Radiation Therapy Oncology Group prostate cancer trials , 2012, Supportive Care in Cancer.

[13]  M. Litwin,et al.  The impact of social networks and partnership status on treatment choice in men with localized prostate cancer , 2012, BJU international.

[14]  Ann F. Chou,et al.  Social support and survival in young women with breast carcinoma , 2012, Psycho-oncology.

[15]  A. Syse,et al.  Changes over time in the effect of marital status on cancer survival , 2011, BMC public health.

[16]  Sven E. Wilson,et al.  Marital status and colon cancer outcomes in US Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results registries: does marriage affect cancer survival by gender and stage? , 2011, Cancer epidemiology.

[17]  D. English,et al.  Does a Mediterranean diet reduce the mortality risk associated with diabetes: evidence from the Melbourne Collaborative Cohort Study. , 2011, Nutrition, metabolism, and cardiovascular diseases : NMCD.

[18]  Sara E. Wagner,et al.  Social and clinical predictors of prostate cancer treatment decisions among men in South Carolina , 2011, Cancer Causes & Control.

[19]  F. Montorsi,et al.  The effect of marital status on stage and survival of prostate cancer patients treated with radical prostatectomy: a population-based study , 2011, Cancer Causes & Control.

[20]  N. Schneiderman,et al.  Longitudinal effects of social support and adaptive coping on the emotional well-being of survivors of localized prostate cancer. , 2010, The journal of supportive oncology.

[21]  M. Pinquart,et al.  Associations of social networks with cancer mortality: a meta-analysis. , 2010, Critical reviews in oncology/hematology.

[22]  A. Trentham-Dietz,et al.  Social networks and survival after breast cancer diagnosis , 2010, Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice.

[23]  D. Umberson,et al.  Social Relationships and Health: A Flashpoint for Health Policy , 2010, Journal of health and social behavior.

[24]  Robert Peveler,et al.  Social support and cancer progression: a systematic review. , 2009, Journal of psychosomatic research.

[25]  N. Christakis,et al.  Social Networks and Health , 2008 .

[26]  Scott D. Cohen,et al.  Social support and chronic kidney disease: an update. , 2007, Advances in chronic kidney disease.

[27]  A. Kamal,et al.  Familial social support and depression in breast cancer: an exploratory study on a Pakistani sample , 2007, Psycho-oncology.

[28]  F. Cousson-Gélie,et al.  Do anxiety, body image, social support and coping strategies predict survival in breast cancer? A ten-year follow-up study. , 2007, Psychosomatics.

[29]  Birthe Lykke Thomsen,et al.  Does marital status and altered contact with the social network predict colorectal cancer survival? , 2006, European journal of cancer.

[30]  Ichiro Kawachi,et al.  Social networks, social support, and survival after breast cancer diagnosis. , 2006, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[31]  Y. Nishiwaki,et al.  Marital status, social support and survival after curative resection in non‐small‐cell lung cancer , 2006, Cancer science.

[32]  B. Ainsworth,et al.  International physical activity questionnaire: 12-country reliability and validity. , 2003, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[33]  Ø. Kravdal Children, family and cancer survival in Norway , 2003, International journal of cancer.

[34]  R. Kessler,et al.  Short screening scales to monitor population prevalences and trends in non-specific psychological distress , 2002, Psychological Medicine.

[35]  R. Gray Modeling Survival Data: Extending the Cox Model , 2002 .

[36]  H. Lai,et al.  Variation in prostate cancer survival explained by significant prognostic factors. , 1997, The Journal of urology.

[37]  Ø. Kravdal,et al.  The importance of marital and socioeconomic status in incidence and survival of prostate cancer. An analysis of complete Norwegian birth cohorts. , 1997, Preventive medicine.

[38]  K. Goodkin,et al.  Marriage and mortality in prostate cancer. , 1996, The Journal of urology.

[39]  J. Brisson,et al.  Social support and survival among women with breast cancer , 1995, Cancer.

[40]  D. Cella,et al.  Someone to live for: social well-being, parenthood status, and decision-making in oncology. , 1995, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[41]  J. Jackson,et al.  The Relationship Between Social Ties and Survival Among Black and White Breast Cancer Patients , 1994 .

[42]  J. Mantell,et al.  Social relations, social support and survival among patients with cancer. , 1992, Journal of psychosomatic research.

[43]  D. Umberson,et al.  Gender, marital status and the social control of health behavior. , 1992, Social science & medicine.

[44]  Lena Osterhagen,et al.  Multiple Imputation For Nonresponse In Surveys , 2016 .

[45]  S. Guthridge,et al.  Socio-economic indexes for areas (SEIFA) of administrative health districts and urban centres/localities in the Northern Territory , 2005 .

[46]  Melissa M Deer,et al.  Social support and health-related quality of life in chronic heart failure patients , 2004, Quality of Life Research.

[47]  J. Dunn,et al.  The supportive care needs of men with prostate cancer (2000) , 2001, Psycho-oncology.

[48]  L Kan,et al.  Effects of social relationships on survival for women with breast cancer: a prospective study. , 1991, Social science & medicine.

[49]  B. Hanson,et al.  Social support and quitting smoking for good. Is there an association? Results from the population study, "Men born in 1914," Malmö, Sweden. , 1990, Addictive behaviors.

[50]  J. Marshall,et al.  The role of stress, social support and age in survival from breast cancer. , 1983, Journal of psychosomatic research.