Use of uterine electromyography to diagnose term and preterm labor

Current methodologies to assess the process of labor, such as tocodynamometry or intrauterine pressure catheters, fetal fibronectin, cervical length measurement and digital cervical examination, have several major drawbacks. They only measure the onset of labor indirectly and do not detect cellular changes characteristic of true labor. Consequently, their predictive values for term or preterm delivery are poor. Uterine contractions are a result of the electrical activity within the myometrium. Measurement of uterine electromyography (EMG) has been shown to detect contractions as accurately as the currently used methods. In addition, changes in cell excitability and coupling required for effective contractions that lead to delivery are reflected in changes of several EMG parameters. Use of uterine EMG can help to identify patients in true labor better than any other method presently employed in the clinic.

[1]  H KURIYAMA,et al.  A study of the parturient uterus with the microelectrode technique. , 1961, Endocrinology.

[2]  Maury A Nussbaum,et al.  Utility of traditional and alternative EMG-based measures of fatigue during low-moderate level isometric efforts. , 2008, Journal of electromyography and kinesiology : official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology.

[3]  C. Marque,et al.  Use of the electrohysterogram signal for characterization of contractions during pregnancy , 1999, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[4]  T. Heeren,et al.  Impact of collaborative management and early admission in labor on method of delivery. , 2003, Journal of obstetric, gynecologic, and neonatal nursing : JOGNN.

[5]  M. Lucovnik,et al.  Noninvasive uterine electromyography for prediction of preterm delivery. , 2011, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[6]  D. Haas.  Preterm birth. , 2011, BMJ clinical evidence.

[7]  G. Allison,et al.  The relationship between EMG median frequency and low frequency band amplitude changes at different levels of muscle capacity. , 2002, Clinical biomechanics.

[8]  G. Wolfs,et al.  Electromyographic Observations on the Human Uterus during Labour , 1979, Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica. Supplement.

[9]  Massimo Mischi,et al.  Estimation of internal uterine pressure by joint amplitude and frequency analysis of electrohysterographic signals , 2008, Physiological measurement.

[10]  R. Romero,et al.  Ultrasonographic examination of the uterine cervix is better than cervical digital examination as a predictor of the likelihood of premature delivery in patients with preterm labor and intact membranes. , 1994, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[11]  J. Marshall,et al.  Regulation of activity in uterine smooth muscle. , 1962, Physiological reviews. Supplement.

[12]  T. Bennett,et al.  Pregnancy-associated hospitalizations in the United States in 1991 and 1992: a comprehensive view of maternal morbidity. , 1998, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[13]  K. Nicolaides,et al.  Sonographic measurement of cervical length in threatened preterm labor in singleton pregnancies with intact membranes , 2005, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[14]  Marshall Jm,et al.  Regulation of activity in uterine smooth muscle. , 1962 .

[15]  G. Visser,et al.  A validation of electrohysterography for uterine activity monitoring during labour , 2009, The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine : the official journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies, the International Society of Perinatal Obstetricians.

[16]  R. Garfield,et al.  Changes in transcripts encoding calcium channel subunits of rat myometrium during pregnancy. , 1995, The American journal of physiology.

[17]  Z. Alfirevic,et al.  Continuous cardiotocography (CTG) as a form of electronic fetal monitoring (EFM) for fetal assessment during labour. , 2006, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[18]  G. Saade,et al.  Non-invasive transabdominal uterine electromyography correlates with the strength of intrauterine pressure and is predictive of labor and delivery , 2004, The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine : the official journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies, the International Society of Perinatal Obstetricians.

[19]  G. Saade,et al.  Uterine activity during pregnancy and labor assessed by simultaneous recordings from the myometrium and abdominal surface in the rat. , 1998, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[20]  E. Hemminki,et al.  The timing of hospital admission and progress of labour. , 1986, European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology.

[21]  J. Kaczorowski,et al.  The effect of family physician timing of maternal admission on procedures in labour and maternal and infant morbidity. , 2004, Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology Canada : JOGC = Journal d'obstetrique et gynecologie du Canada : JOGC.

[22]  R. Smyth,et al.  Epidural versus non-epidural or no analgesia in labour. , 2005, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[23]  Sandy Rihana,et al.  Preterm labour detection by use of a biophysical marker: the uterine electrical activity , 2007, BMC pregnancy and childbirth.

[24]  W. Holcomb,et al.  Cervical Effacement: Variation in Belief Among Clinicians , 1991, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[25]  R. Garfield,et al.  Gap junction currents in cultured muscle cells from human myometrium. , 1998, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[26]  R. Garfield,et al.  Uterine contractility as assessed by abdominal surface recording of electromyographic activity in rats during pregnancy. , 1996, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[27]  J. Iams,et al.  Prediction and early detection of preterm labor. , 2003, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[28]  P. Janssen,et al.  Early labour assessment and support at home: a randomized controlled trial. , 2003, Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology Canada : JOGC = Journal d'obstetrique et gynecologie du Canada : JOGC.

[29]  B. Blondel,et al.  [The length of the cervix and the risk of spontaneous premature delivery]. , 1996, Revue d'epidemiologie et de sante publique.

[30]  D. Maulik,et al.  Maternal–Fetal and Neonatal Medicine: a synergistic alliance for a new beginning , 2002 .

[31]  J. Jezewski,et al.  Quantitative analysis of contraction patterns in electrical activity signal of pregnant uterus as an alternative to mechanical approach , 2005, Physiological measurement.

[32]  E E Daniel,et al.  Improved propagation in myometrium associated with gap junctions during parturition. , 1989, The American journal of physiology.

[33]  E. Hodnett,et al.  Labour assessment programs to delay admission to labour wards. , 2001, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[34]  A. Kaider,et al.  Cervical length and dilatation of the internal cervical os detected by vaginal ultrasonography as markers for preterm delivery: A systematic review. , 1999, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[35]  I. Verdenik,et al.  Uterine electrical activity as predictor of preterm birth in women with preterm contractions. , 2001, European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology.

[36]  S. Gabbe,et al.  Obstetrics: Normal and Problem Pregnancies , 1998 .

[37]  M. Klein.  Epidural analgesia: does it or doesn't it? , 2006, Birth.

[38]  E. Hodnett,et al.  Tocolytics for preterm labor: a systematic review. , 1999, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[39]  Elizabeth A Thom,et al.  Frequency of uterine contractions and the risk of spontaneous preterm delivery. , 2002, The New England journal of medicine.

[40]  G. Saade,et al.  Comparing uterine electromyography activity of antepartum patients versus term labor patients. , 2005, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[41]  E. Mohammadi,et al.  Barriers and facilitators related to the implementation of a physiological track and trigger system: A systematic review of the qualitative evidence , 2017, International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care.

[42]  G. Saade,et al.  Predicting Term and Preterm Delivery With Transabdominal Uterine Electromyography , 2003, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[43]  L. Oppenheimer,et al.  The relationship between cervical dilatation at initial presentation in labour and subsequent intervention , 2001, BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[44]  P. Husslein,et al.  Oxytocin receptors in the human uterus during pregnancy and parturition. , 1984, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[45]  C Marque,et al.  Uterine electromyography: a critical review. , 1993, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[46]  William C Miller,et al.  The epidemiology of threatened preterm labor: a prospective cohort study. , 2005, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[47]  G. Saade,et al.  Control and assessment of the uterus and cervix during pregnancy and labour. , 1998, Human reproduction update.

[48]  William L. Maner,et al.  Identification of Human Term and Preterm Labor using Artificial Neural Networks on Uterine Electromyography Data , 2007, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[49]  K. Nicolaides,et al.  Sonographic measurement of cervical length in twin pregnancies in threatened preterm labor , 2004, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[50]  Lucas M Bachmann,et al.  Accuracy of cervicovaginal fetal fibronectin test in predicting risk of spontaneous preterm birth: systematic review , 2002, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[51]  R. Garfield,et al.  Electrical Activity of the Human Uterus During Pregnancy as Recorded from the Abdominal Surface , 1997, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[52]  G. Fele-Zorz,et al.  A comparison of various linear and non-linear signal processing techniques to separate uterine EMG records of term and pre-term delivery groups , 2008, Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing.

[53]  William L. Maner,et al.  Characterization of abdominally acquired uterine electrical signals in humans, using a non-linear analytic method , 2005, Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing.