Unfamiliar fuel: How the UK public views the infrastructure required to supply hydrogen for road transport

In 2007, under contract to the UK Department for Transport, we engaged with the public about the infrastructure to supply hydrogen for transport. We combined a quota-sample survey of 1003 across three disparate ‘travel-to-work areas’ in England with focus groups representative of them. We informed the groups ‘at arm's length’ through a purpose-made video, composed with advice from a hydrogen scientist and made by professional broadcasters. Participants saw benefits in hydrogen energy. None rejected it on safety grounds, though many discussed the risks. The costs were considered a problem. ‘The public’ was not of one mind. Regular car drivers were unwilling to reduce their car use. Bus users, cyclists and walkers often sought improvements in air quality. Motorists knew more than others about hydrogen energy. In discussion we seek psychological and socio-cultural explanations for these results. We conclude by drawing out implications for the future of hydrogen in transport.

[1]  S. Mourato,et al.  Analysing awareness and acceptability of hydrogen vehicles: A London case study , 2005 .

[2]  B. Höijer.  Social Representations Theory , 2011 .

[3]  D. L. Hawkes,et al.  An exploratory study of public opinions on the use of hydrogen energy in Wales , 2008 .

[4]  David J. Hart,et al.  Greening London's black cabs: a study of driver's preferences for fuel cell taxis , 2004 .

[5]  D. Edge,et al.  The social shaping of technology , 1988 .

[6]  Miriam. Ricci,et al.  Environmental citizenship and public attitudes to hydrogen energy technologies , 2008 .

[7]  Malcolm Eames,et al.  Towards a sustainable hydrogen economy: A multi-criteria sustainability appraisal of competing hydrogen futures , 2007 .

[8]  Miriam Ricci,et al.  The transition to hydrogen‐based energy: combining technology and risk assessments and lay perspectives , 2007 .

[9]  Corinne Le Quéré,et al.  Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis , 2013 .

[10]  Miriam Ricci,et al.  The limits of upstream engagement in an emergent technology: lay perceptions of hydrogen energy technologies , 2011 .

[11]  George A. Silver,et al.  Risk and Culture , 1983 .

[12]  A. Giddens,et al.  Reflexive Modernization: Politics, Tradition and Aesthetics in the Modern Social Order , 1994 .

[13]  Publisher Bioinfo Publications.  Nanotechnology and Nanoscience , 2013 .

[14]  Miriam. Ricci,et al.  Risk Perception of an Emergent Technology: The Case of Hydrogen Energy , 2006 .

[15]  W. McDowall.  Technology roadmaps for transition management: The case of hydrogen energy , 2012 .

[16]  Jillian Anable,et al.  An evidence-based review of public attitudes to climate change and transport behaviour - final report , 2006 .

[17]  Alan Irwin,et al.  Public Deliberation and Governance: Engaging with Science and Technology in Contemporary Europe , 2006 .

[18]  Peter Achterberg,et al.  Knowing hydrogen and loving it too? Information provision, cultural predispositions, and support for hydrogen technology among the Dutch , 2014, Public understanding of science.

[19]  S. Moscovici.  Notes towards a description of Social Representations , 1988 .

[20]  Paul Upham,et al.  Applying environmental-behaviour concepts to renewable energy siting controversy: Reflections on a longitudinal bioenergy case study , 2009 .

[21]  Jeremy Rifkin,et al.  The Hydrogen Economy , 2021, Transitioning to a Prosperous, Resilient and Carbon-Free Economy.

[22]  D. Morgan.  Focus groups for qualitative research. , 1988, Hospital guest relations report.

[23]  P. Bellaby,et al.  Might More Harm Be Done Than Good When Scientists and Engineers Engage with the Public About New Technology Before it is Fully Developed? The Case of Hydrogen Energy , 2016 .

[24]  Kristina Haraldsson,et al.  A first report on the attitude towards hydrogen fuel cell buses in Stockholm , 2006 .

[25]  H Roberts,et al.  Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity , 1994 .

[26]  P. Bellaby.  Communication and miscommunication of risk: understanding UK parents' attitudes to combined MMR vaccination , 2003, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[27]  Andrew Stirling,et al.  Deliberative mapping: a novel analytic-deliberative methodology to support contested science-policy decisions , 2007 .

[28]  N Künzli,et al.  Public-health impact of outdoor and traffic-related air pollution: a European assessment , 2000, The Lancet.

[29]  Patrick Devine-Wright,et al.  Public understanding of hydrogen energy: a theoretical approach. , 2010 .

[30]  Miriam Ricci,et al.  What do we know about public perceptions and acceptance of hydrogen? A critical review and new case study evidence , 2008 .

[31]  P. Bellaby,et al.  Lay discourse about hydrogen energy and the environment: Discussion by young people and adults following a first visit to a hydrogen research and demonstration centre , 2014 .

[32]  Miriam Ricci,et al.  Stakeholders’ and Publics’ Perceptions of Hydrogen Energy Technologies , 2007 .

[33]  O. Langhelle,et al.  Estimating determinants of public acceptance of hydrogen vehicles and refuelling stations in greater Stavanger , 2012 .

[34]  David J. Hart,et al.  Greening London's black cabs: next term a study of driver's preferences for fuel cell taxis , 2004 .

[35]  M. Douglas,et al.  Risk and Culture , 1983 .

[36]  S. Kaplan,et al.  Toward a Methodology for the Measurement of Knowledge Structures of Ordinary People , 1997 .

[37]  A. Giddens.  Runaway World: How Globalization is Reshaping Our Lives , 1999 .

[38]  Kas Hemmes,et al.  Public Acceptance of Hydrogen in the Netherlands: Two Surveys That Demystify Public Views on a Hydrogen Economy , 2006 .

[39]  T. Veziroglu,et al.  The properties of hydrogen as fuel tomorrow in sustainable energy system for a cleaner planet , 2005 .

[40]  L. Festinger,et al.  A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance , 2017 .

[41]  René Zimmer,et al.  Let's go green with hydrogen! The general public's perspective , 2012 .

[42]  Miriam Ricci,et al.  Hydrogen: too dangerous to base our future upon? , 2006 .

[43]  M. Douglas.  Purity and Danger , 1966 .

[44]  Paul Upham,et al.  Public Engagement with Hydrogen Infrastructures in Transport , 2007 .

[45]  M. Douglas.  Risk and Blame , 2018, A Good Position for Birth.