Organizations can more readily monitor and reposition their operations in fast-paced, competitive environments when their performance measurement systems provide them with relevant, timely, complete, and accurate information.i¾ i¾ Despite recognition of the need for such systems, much organizational performance measurement guidance consists primarily of descriptive approaches and anecdotes.i¾ i¾ There is a need for a structured approach to documenting and analyzing organization-wide performance measurement systems such as to address the organization, its environment, its measures, and its measurement infrastructure as an integrated whole.i¾ i¾ The purpose of this article is to describe a systems management approach and an associated process that have been developed to support the documentation and analysis of organization-wide performance measurement systems.i¾ i¾ A decision support system, The Organizational Performance Tracking & IMprovement Analysis System (OPTIMAS), was developed to automate use of the process and facilitate the documentation, analysis, evolution, and improvement of organizational performance measurement systems.i¾ i¾ It is described in this article.i¾ i¾ The approach and software emphasize identification of suppliers and customers, exogenous influences on organizational performance, the performance information infrastructure, and organizational components and processes.i¾ i¾ It requires detailed specification of performance measures and their logistical requirements.i¾ i¾ It supports analyses of individual metrics, sets of metrics sets, and the information infrastructure required for successful performance measurement.i¾ i¾ A case study illustrates use of the OPTIMAS process.
[1]
R. Stake.
The art of case study research
,
1995
.
[2]
Joseph Moses Juran.
Juran on planning for quality
,
1988
.
[3]
R. Kaplan,et al.
Using the balanced scorecard as a strategic management system
,
1996
.
[4]
Andrew P. Sage.
Decision support systems engineering
,
1991
.
[5]
Bernard H. Boar,et al.
The Art of Strategic Planning for Information Technology: Crafting Strategy for the 90s
,
1993
.
[6]
Andrew P. Sage,et al.
Systems Management for Information Technology and Software Engineering
,
1995
.
[7]
Susanne Kelly,et al.
The Complexity Advantage: How the Science of Complexity Can Help Your Business Achieve Peak Performance
,
1999
.
[8]
Bernard H. Boar,et al.
Cost-effective strategies for client/server systems
,
1995
.
[9]
W. Edwards Deming,et al.
Out of the Crisis
,
1982
.
[10]
Thomas J. Peters,et al.
Thriving on Chaos: Handbook for a Management Revolution
,
1988
.
[11]
Bernard H. Boar,et al.
Practical Steps for Aligning Information Technology with Business Strategies: How to Achieve a Competitive Advantage
,
1994
.
[12]
Bernard H. Boar,et al.
Constructing Blueprints for Enterprise IT Architectures
,
1998
.
[13]
D. Scott Sink,et al.
Productivity management : planning, measurement and evaluation, control, and improvement
,
1985
.
[14]
D. S. Sink,et al.
Planning and Measurement in Your Organization of the Future
,
1989
.
[15]
E. Ziegel,et al.
The Balanced Scorecard
,
1998
.