Disentangling the four demographic dimensions of species invasiveness

A definitive list of invasive species traits remains elusive, perhaps due to inconsistent ways of identifying invasive species. Invasive species are typically identified using one or more of four demographic criteria (local abundance, geographic range, environmental range, spread rate), referred to here as the demographic dimensions of invasiveness. In 112 studies comparing invasive and non‐invasive plant traits, all 15 combinations of the four demographic dimensions were used to identify invasive species; 22% of studies identified invasive species solely by high abundance, while 25% ignored abundance. We used demographic data of 340 alien herbs classified as invasive or non‐invasive in Victoria, Australia, to test whether the demographic dimensions are independent and which dimensions influence invasive species listing in practice. Species' abundances, spread rates and range sizes were independent. Relative abundance best explained the invasiveness classification. However, invasive and non‐invasive species each spanned the full range of each demographic dimension, indicating that no dimension clearly separates invasive from non‐invasive species. Graminoids with longer minimum residence times were more frequently classified as invasive, as were forbs occurring near edges of native vegetation fragments. Synthesis. Conflating multiple forms of invasiveness, by not distinguishing invasive species that are identified using different demographic criteria, may obscure traits possessed by particular subsets of invasive species. Traits promoting high abundance likely differ from those enabling fast spread and broad ranges. Examining traits linked with the four demographic dimensions of invasiveness will highlight species at risk of becoming dominant, spreading quickly or occupying large ranges.

[1]  P. Choler,et al.  What it takes to invade grassland ecosystems: traits, introduction history and filtering processes. , 2016, Ecology letters.

[2]  R. Tingley,et al.  The genetic backburn: using rapid evolution to halt invasions , 2016, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[3]  Cindy E Hauser,et al.  Practicable methods for delimiting a plant invasion , 2016 .

[4]  Y. Buckley,et al.  Does the biogeographic origin of species matter? Ecological effects of native and non‐native species and the use of origin to guide management , 2016 .

[5]  R. Hobbs,et al.  A Long-Term Experimental Case Study of the Ecological Effectiveness and Cost Effectiveness of Invasive Plant Management in Achieving Conservation Goals: Bitou Bush Control in Booderee National Park in Eastern Australia , 2015, PloS one.

[6]  I. Kühn,et al.  Naturalization of central European plants in North America: species traits, habitats, propagule pressure, residence time. , 2015, Ecology.

[7]  M. Leishman,et al.  Trait differences between naturalized and invasive plant species independent of residence time and phylogeny , 2014, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[8]  S. Higgins,et al.  Invasive plants have broader physiological niches , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[9]  Michael R Kearney,et al.  Realized niche shift during a global biological invasion , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[10]  D. Richardson,et al.  Defining the Impact of Non-Native Species , 2014, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[11]  Alana L. Moore,et al.  Linking Indices for Biodiversity Monitoring to Extinction Risk Theory , 2013, bioRxiv.

[12]  J. Barney,et al.  What is the “real” impact of invasive plant species? , 2013 .

[13]  Testing the Australian Weed Risk Assessment with different estimates for invasiveness , 2013, Biological Invasions.

[14]  William K. Morris,et al.  The role of functional traits in species distributions revealed through a hierarchical model , 2012 .

[15]  M. Fischer,et al.  Common and rare plant species respond differently to fertilisation and competition, whether they are alien or native. , 2012, Ecology letters.

[16]  B. D. Hardesty,et al.  The intermediate disturbance hypothesis and plant invasions: Implications for species richness and management , 2012 .

[17]  Jan Pergl,et al.  A global assessment of invasive plant impacts on resident species, communities and ecosystems: the interaction of impact measures, invading species' traits and environment , 2012, Global Change Biology.

[18]  Melodie A McGeoch,et al.  Uncertainty in invasive alien species listing. , 2012, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[19]  Philip E. Hulme,et al.  Weed risk assessment: a way forward or a waste of time? , 2012 .

[20]  Ran Nathan,et al.  Seed terminal velocity, wind turbulence, and demography drive the spread of an invasive tree in an analytical model. , 2012, Ecology.

[21]  Brendan A. Wintle,et al.  Hotspots of plant invasion predicted by propagule pressure and ecosystem characteristics , 2011 .

[22]  D. Richardson,et al.  Quantifying levels of biological invasion: towards the objective classification of invaded and invasible ecosystems , 2011, Global Change Biology.

[23]  M. Vilà,et al.  Ecological impacts of invasive alien plants: a meta-analysis of their effects on species, communities and ecosystems. , 2011, Ecology letters.

[24]  Petr Pyšek,et al.  A proposed unified framework for biological invasions. , 2011, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[25]  Inderjit,et al.  Emergent insights from the synthesis of conceptual frameworks for biological invasions. , 2011, Ecology letters.

[26]  Janneke HilleRisLambers,et al.  Abundance of introduced species at home predicts abundance away in herbaceous communities. , 2011, Ecology letters.

[27]  Alejandro Ordonez Gloriaac,et al.  3 Functional differences between native and alien species: a global–scale comparison , 2011 .

[28]  M. Rejmánek,et al.  Assessing potential invasiveness of woody horticultural plant species using seedling growth rate traits , 2010 .

[29]  M. Fischer,et al.  Are invaders different? A conceptual framework of comparative approaches for assessing determinants of invasiveness. , 2010, Ecology letters.

[30]  A. Hastings,et al.  Controlling established invaders: integrating economics and spread dynamics to determine optimal management. , 2010, Ecology letters.

[31]  S. Ustin,et al.  The effects of temporally variable dispersal and landscape structure on invasive species spread. , 2010, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[32]  H. Muller‐Landau.  The tolerance–fecundity trade-off and the maintenance of diversity in seed size , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[33]  M. Fischer,et al.  A meta-analysis of trait differences between invasive and non-invasive plant species. , 2010, Ecology letters.

[34]  S. Butchart,et al.  Global indicators of biological invasion: species numbers, biodiversity impact and policy responses , 2010 .

[35]  D. Richardson,et al.  Biogeographic concepts define invasion biology , 2009 .

[36]  Richard A. Lankau,et al.  Evolutionary limits ameliorate the negative impact of an invasive plant , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[37]  David F. R. P. Burslem,et al.  Factors explaining alien plant invasion success in a tropical ecosystem differ at each stage of invasion , 2009 .

[38]  Cindy E. Hauser,et al.  Streamlining 'search and destroy': cost-effective surveillance for invasive species management. , 2009, Ecology letters.

[39]  Alana L. Burley,et al.  Weeds and biodiversity conservation: A review of managing weeds under the New South Wales Threatened Species Conservation Act 1995 , 2009 .

[40]  K. Gaston,et al.  The sizes of species’ geographic ranges , 2009 .

[41]  F Dane Panetta,et al.  An analysis of assessment outcomes from eight years' operation of the Australian border weed risk assessment system. , 2009, Journal of environmental management.

[42]  C. Nilsson,et al.  Reducing redundancy in invasion ecology by integrating hypotheses into a single theoretical framework , 2009 .

[43]  Orr Spiegel,et al.  Mechanisms of long-distance seed dispersal. , 2008, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[44]  Petr Pyšek,et al.  Traits Associated with Invasiveness in Alien Plants: Where Do we Stand? , 2008 .

[45]  C. Violle,et al.  Let the concept of trait be functional , 2007 .

[46]  D. Richardson,et al.  Residence time and potential range: crucial considerations in modelling plant invasions , 2007 .

[47]  A. Ricciardi,et al.  The invasiveness of an introduced species does not predict its impact , 2007, Biological Invasions.

[48]  Richard J. Harper,et al.  Determination of Spatial Distribution Patterns of Clay and Plant Available Potassium Contents in Surface Soils at the Farm Scale using High Resolution Gamma Ray Spectrometry , 2006, Plant and Soil.

[49]  H. MacIsaac,et al.  Propagule pressure: a null model for biological invasions , 2006, Biological Invasions.

[50]  A. Nicotra,et al.  Geographic range size, seedling ecophysiology and phenotypic plasticity in Australian Acacia species , 2005 .

[51]  Robert I. Colautti,et al.  A neutral terminology to define ‘invasive’ species , 2004 .

[52]  P. Kareiva,et al.  Impact: Toward a Framework for Understanding the Ecological Effects of Invaders , 1999, Biological Invasions.

[53]  M. Burgman.  Expert frailties in conservation risk assessment and listing decisions , 2004 .

[54]  S. Sultan.  Phenotypic plasticity for fitness components in Polygonum species of contrasting ecological breadth , 2001 .

[55]  Mark A. Burgman,et al.  Flaws in Subjective Assessments of Ecological Risks and Means for Correcting Them , 2001 .

[56]  I. Owens,et al.  Ecological basis of extinction risk in birds: habitat loss versus human persecution and introduced predators. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[57]  K. Thompson,et al.  Native and alien invasive plants: more of the same? , 1995 .

[58]  R. Hobbs,et al.  An integrated approach to the ecology and management of plant invasions , 1995 .

[59]  Graeme Caughley,et al.  Directions in conservation biology , 1994 .

[60]  M. Burgman.  The Habitat Volumes of Scarce and Ubiquitous Plants: A Test of the Model of Environmental Control , 1989, The American Naturalist.

[61]  S. Cairns,et al.  Seven forms of rarity and their frequency in the flora of the British Isles , 1986 .

[62]  D. Tilman.  Resource competition and community structure. , 1983, Monographs in population biology.

[63]  J. Grimes.  The Biological Aspects of Rare Plant Conservation , 1982 .

[64]  L. L. Doust,et al.  Population dynamics and local specialization in a clonal perennial (Ranunculus repens). I. The dynamics of ramets in contrasting habitats , 1981 .