Noise cancellation for electrotactile sensory feedback of myoelectric forearm prostheses

For achieving a closed-loop, bidirectional control over myoelectric prosthetic hands, adopting the electrical stimulation in the sensory feedback channel for providing electrotactile substitution is currently a big trend. However, the electrical pulses used for stimulation may spread to the EMG collection sites which significantly interferes the controlling stability. In this paper, a novel noise cancellation method is proposed to suppress the interference between the electrotactile feedback subsystem and the electromyographic collection subsystem. Based on the propagation model of the stimulation noise, this method integrates the optimization of the stimulation waveform, the special design of the stimulation electrode and the advanced technique of digital signal processing. Experiments on healthy subjects are conducted to verify the feasibility of the proposed method. Primary results show that, through the method, the signal to noise rate (SNR) of the EMG signals reaches to 43dB, without frequency or time multiplexing.

[1]  H. Bueckner.  ON A CLASS OF SINGULAR INTEGRAL EQUATIONS , 1966 .

[2]  Christian Antfolk,et al.  Sensory feedback in upper limb prosthetics , 2013, Expert review of medical devices.

[3]  Bernard Widrow,et al.  Adaptive switching circuits , 1988 .

[4]  W.J. Tompkins,et al.  Electrotactile and vibrotactile displays for sensory substitution systems , 1991, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[5]  A. N. Willson,et al.  Analysis of the output spectrum for direct digital frequency synthesizers in the presence of phase truncation and finite arithmetic precision , 2001, ISPA 2001. Proceedings of the 2nd International Symposium on Image and Signal Processing and Analysis. In conjunction with 23rd International Conference on Information Technology Interfaces (IEEE Cat..

[6]  C. Antfolk,et al.  Artificial Redirection of Sensation From Prosthetic Fingers to the Phantom Hand Map on Transradial Amputees: Vibrotactile Versus Mechanotactile Sensory Feedback , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[7]  Peter H. Veltink,et al.  Vibro- and Electrotactile User Feedback on Hand Opening for Myoelectric Forearm Prostheses , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[8]  R. N. Scott,et al.  Sensory-feedback system compatible with myoelectric control , 2006, Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing.

[9]  G. Sunouchi.  A class of singular integral equations , 1951 .

[10]  Aaron M. Dollar,et al.  Performance characteristics of anthropomorphic prosthetic hands , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics.

[11]  O. Stavdahl,et al.  Control of Upper Limb Prostheses: Terminology and Proportional Myoelectric Control—A Review , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[12]  S. Douglas.  A family of normalized LMS algorithms , 1994, IEEE Signal Processing Letters.

[13]  Elaine Biddiss,et al.  Consumer design priorities for upper limb prosthetics , 2007, Disability and rehabilitation. Assistive technology.

[14]  Mark I. Johnson,et al.  Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation , 2009 .

[15]  G F Inbar,et al.  Optimization of pulse duration and pulse charge during transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation. , 1983, The Australian journal of physiotherapy.

[16]  Christian Cipriani,et al.  A Miniature Vibrotactile Sensory Substitution Device for Multifingered Hand Prosthetics , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[17]  Hans Dietl,et al.  User demands for sensory feedback in upper extremity prostheses , 2012, 2012 IEEE International Symposium on Medical Measurements and Applications Proceedings.

[18]  Erik Scheme,et al.  Electromyogram pattern recognition for control of powered upper-limb prostheses: state of the art and challenges for clinical use. , 2011, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.