Using the Chernobyl Incident to Teach Engineering Ethics

This paper discusses using the Chernobyl Incident as a case study in engineering ethics instruction. Groups of students are asked to take on the role of a faction involved in the Chernobyl disaster and to defend their decisions in a mock debate. The results of student surveys and the Engineering and Science Issues Test indicate that the approach is very popular with students and has a positive impact on moral reasoning. The approach incorporates technical, communication and teamwork skills and has many of the features suggested by recent literature.

[1]  Roy Ballantyne,et al.  Enhancing environmental conceptions: An evaluation of cognitive conflict and structured controversy learning units , 1995 .

[2]  C. Shaw,et al.  Using Role-Play Scenarios in the IR Classroom: An Examination of Exercises on Peacekeeping Operations and Foreign Policy Decision Making , 2004 .

[3]  David W. Johnson,et al.  Conflict in the Classroom: Controversy And Learning , 1979 .

[4]  R. L. Rosnow.  Teaching Research Ethics through Role-Play and Discussion , 1990, Teaching of psychology.

[5]  Stephen J. Thoma,et al.  Postconventional Moral Thinking: A Neo-Kohlbergian Approach , 1999 .

[6]  Sharon R. Bird,et al.  A Constructive Controversy Approach to “Case Studies” , 2010 .

[7]  David W. Johnson,et al.  Can conflict be constructive? Controversy versus concurrence seeking in learning groups. , 1981 .

[8]  Britta Nestler,et al.  Computational materials engineering , 2007 .

[9]  Kate Brown.  Using role play to integrate ethics into the business curriculum a financial management example , 1994 .

[10]  Michael S. Pritchard,et al.  Engineering Ethics: What? Why? How? And When? , 1996 .

[11]  Byron Newberry,et al.  The dilemma of ethics in engineering education , 2004, Science and engineering ethics.

[12]  Michael C. Loui,et al.  Development of Role-Play Scenarios for Teaching Responsible Conduct of Research , 2010, Sci. Eng. Ethics.

[13]  Stephen J. Thoma,et al.  Alchemy and beyond: Indexing the Defining Issues Test. , 1997 .

[14]  David G. Wareham,et al.  Introducing ethics using structured controversies , 2006 .

[15]  Deborah S. Meizlish,et al.  Becoming Congress: A Longitudinal Study of the Civic Engagement Implications of a Classroom Simulation , 2003 .

[16]  Bridget Bero,et al.  Teaching Ethics to Engineers: Ethical Decision Making Parallels the Engineering Design Process , 2011, Sci. Eng. Ethics.

[17]  Rachel Kraus,et al.  You Must Participate: Violating Research Ethical Principles Through Role-Play , 2008 .

[18]  W. B. Johnson,et al.  Learning Ethics the Hard Way: Facing the Ethics Committee , 1998, Teaching of psychology.

[19]  Michael J. Prince,et al.  Does Active Learning Work? A Review of the Research , 2004 .

[20]  Paul M. Santi.  Ethics Exercises for Civil, Environmental, and Geological Engineers , 2000 .

[21]  Jack A. Raisner.  Using the "Ethical Environment" Paradigm to Teach Business Ethics: The Case of the Maquiladoras , 1997 .

[22]  K. Deneve,et al.  Role play simulations: The assessment of an active learning technique and comparisons with traditional lectures , 1997 .

[23]  Israel Doron,et al.  Court of Ethics: Teaching Ethics and Ageing by means of Role-Playing , 2007 .

[24]  Jason Borenstein,et al.  The Engineering and Science Issues Test (ESIT): A Discipline-Specific Approach to Assessing Moral Judgment , 2010, Sci. Eng. Ethics.

[25]  Gail M. Jensen,et al.  Reflection on the Teaching of Ethics in Physical Therapist Education: Integrating Cases, Theory, and Learning , 2005 .

[26]  Karl A. Smith,et al.  Constructive Controversy: The Educative Power of Intellectual Conflict , 2000 .

[27]  P. Aarne Vesilind.  Using Academic Integrity to Teach Engineering Ethics , 1996 .

[28]  Anne Colby,et al.  Ethics Teaching in Undergraduate Engineering Education , 2008 .

[29]  David W. Johnson,et al.  Are All Types of Cooperation Equal? Impact of Academic Controversy Versus Concurrence-Seeking on Health Education , 2002 .

[30]  J. Herkert,et al.  Continuing and emerging issues in engineering ethics education and research: integrating microethics and macroethics , 2004, IEEE Power Engineering Society General Meeting, 2004..

[31]  Marcel D'Eon,et al.  An Innovative Modification to Structured Controversy , 2001 .

[32]  Stephen J. Thoma,et al.  DIT2: Devising and testing a revised instrument of moral judgment. , 1999, Journal of Educational Psychology.

[33]  Rajib N. Sanyal.  An Experiential Approach to Teaching Ethics in International Business , 2000 .

[34]  Psychologie.  Kohlberg's Stages of Moral Development , 2010 .

[35]  David W. Johnson,et al.  Classroom Conflict: Controversy Versus Debate in Learning Groups , 1985 .

[36]  Jeffrey S. Lantis,et al.  Building Knowledge? Evaluating the Effectiveness of the Global Problems Summit Simulation , 2006 .

[37]  D. B. Strohmetz,et al.  The Use of Role-Play in Teaching Research Ethics: A Validation Study , 1992, Teaching of psychology.

[38]  Julie L. Swann,et al.  Engineering Ethical Curricula: Assessment and Comparison of Two Approaches , 2005 .

[39]  Marnie K. Jorenby.  Comics and war: transforming perceptions of the Other through a constructive learning experience , 2007 .

[40]  D. Haws.  Ethics Instruction in Engineering Education: A (Mini) Meta‐Analysis , 2001 .

[41]  C. Hudak,et al.  Using Simulations to Promote Learning in Higher Education: An Introduction , 2004 .

[42]  Julie M. Hupp,et al.  Active Learning Through Role Playing: Virtual Babies in a Child Development Course , 2009 .

[43]  William C. Oakes,et al.  Engineering Your Future: A Comprehensive Introduction to Engineering , 2000 .

[44]  Cary J. Roseth,et al.  The Impact of Constructive Controversy on Moral Development , 2010 .

[45]  Michael C. Loui.  What Can Students Learn in an Extended Role-Play Simulation on Technology and Society? , 2009 .