Using touchscreen interaction data to predict cognitive workload

Although a great number of today’s learning applications run on devices with an interactive screen, the high-resolution interaction data which these devices provide have not been used for workload-adaptive systems yet. This paper aims at exploring the potential of using touch sensor data to predict user states in learning scenarios. For this purpose, we collected touch interaction patterns of children solving math tasks on a multi-touch device. 30 fourth-grade students from a primary school participated in the study. Based on these data, we investigate how machine learning methods can be applied to predict cognitive workload associated with tasks of varying difficulty. Our results show that interaction patterns from a touchscreen can be used to significantly improve automatic prediction of high levels of cognitive workload (average classification accuracy of 90.67% between the easiest and most difficult tasks). Analyzing an extensive set of features, we discuss which characteristics are most likely to be of high value for future implementations. We furthermore elaborate on design choices made for the used multiple choice interface and discuss critical factors that should be considered for future touch-based learning interfaces.

[1]  Sergio Salmeron-Majadas,et al.  An Evaluation of Mouse and Keyboard Interaction Indicators towards Non-intrusive and Low Cost Affective Modeling in an Educational Context , 2014, KES.

[2]  Wolfgang Rosenstiel,et al.  Cognitive state monitoring and the design of adaptive instruction in digital environments: lessons learned from cognitive workload assessment using a passive brain-computer interface approach , 2014, Front. Neurosci..

[3]  Chih-Jen Lin,et al.  Combining SVMs with Various Feature Selection Strategies , 2006, Feature Extraction.

[4]  Yvonne Kammerer,et al.  keyValuate: A Framework for Rapid Evaluation of Adaptive Keyboards on Touchscreens , 2015, OZCHI.

[5]  Christian Gütl,et al.  AdELE: A Framework for Adaptive E-Learning through Eye Tracking , 2004 .

[6]  Wolfgang Rosenstiel,et al.  Towards the keyboard of oz: learning individual soft-keyboard models from raw optical sensor data , 2012, ITS.

[7]  André Vandierendonck,et al.  The role of working memory in the carry operation of mental arithmetic: Number and value of the carry , 2007, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[8]  Sergio Salmeron-Majadas,et al.  Towards Emotion Detection in Educational Scenarios from Facial Expressions and Body Movements through Multimodal Approaches , 2014, TheScientificWorldJournal.

[9]  Wolfgang Rosenstiel,et al.  User identification using raw sensor data from typing on interactive displays , 2014, IUI.

[10]  Yuan Gao,et al.  What Does Touch Tell Us about Emotions in Touchscreen-Based Gameplay? , 2012, TCHI.

[11]  Fang Chen,et al.  Towards Automatic Cognitive Load Measurement from Speech Analysis , 2007, HCI.

[12]  Tom Murray,et al.  Toward Measuring and Maintaining the Zone of Proximal Development in Adaptive Instructional Systems , 2002, Intelligent Tutoring Systems.

[13]  Frank Domahs,et al.  To carry or not to carry--is this the question? Disentangling the carry effect in multi-digit addition. , 2010, Acta psychologica.

[14]  Arthur C. Graesser,et al.  Multimodal semi-automated affect detection from conversational cues, gross body language, and facial features , 2010, User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction.

[15]  Marcus Specht,et al.  Sensor Technology for Learning Support , 2014 .

[16]  Korbinian Moeller,et al.  Three processes underlying the carry effect in addition--evidence from eye tracking. , 2011, British journal of psychology.

[17]  Hongying Meng,et al.  Affective State Level Recognition in Naturalistic Facial and Vocal Expressions , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics.

[18]  Jian Kong,et al.  The neural substrate of arithmetic operations and procedure complexity. , 2005, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[19]  J. LeFevre,et al.  Working memory demands of exact and approximate addition , 2007 .

[20]  Beverly Park Woolf,et al.  Building Intelligent Interactive Tutors: Student-centered Strategies for Revolutionizing E-learning , 2008 .

[21]  M. Coltheart,et al.  The quarterly journal of experimental psychology , 1985 .

[22]  Mark H. Ashcraft,et al.  Evidence for retrieval and decision processes in mental addition , 1978 .