The ecology of information: an overview on the ecological significance of making informed decisions

Information is characterized as the reduction of uncertainty and by a change in the state of a receiving organism. Thus, organisms can acquire information about their environment that reduces uncertainty and increases their likelihood of choosing a best-matching strategy. We define the ecology of information as the study of how organisms acquire and use information in decision-making and its significance for populations, communities, landscapes and ecosystems. As a whole, it encompasses the reception and processing of information, decision-making, and the ecological consequences of making informed decisions. The first two stages constitute the domains of, e.g. sensory ecology and behavioral ecology. The exploration of the consequences of information use at larger spatial and temporal scales in ecology has lagged behind these other disciplines. In our overview we characterize information, discuss statistical decision theory as a quantitative framework to analyze information and decision-making, and discuss potential ecological ramifications. Rather than attempt a cursory review of the enormity of the scope of information we highlight information use in development, breeding habitat selection, and interceptive eavesdropping on alarm calls. Through these topics we discuss specific examples of ecological information use and the emerging ecological consequences. We emphasize recurring themes: information is collected from multiple sources, over varying temporal and spatial scales, and in many cases links heterospecifics to one another. We conclude by breaking from specific ecological contexts to explore implications of information as a central organizing principle, including: information webs, information as a component of the niche concept, and information as an ecosystem process. With information having such an enormous reach in ecology we further cast a spotlight on the potential harmful effects of anthropogenic noise and info-disruption.

[1]  Sasha R. X. Dall,et al.  Information and its use by animals in evolutionary ecology. , 2005, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[2]  E. Virgós,et al.  Behavioural responses to changing landscapes: flock structure and anti‐predator strategies of tits wintering in fragmented forests , 2001 .

[3]  T. Valone,et al.  Public Information: From Nosy Neighbors to Cultural Evolution , 2004, Science.

[4]  M. A. Leibold.  The Niche Concept Revisited: Mechanistic Models and Community Context , 1995 .

[5]  Theunis Piersma,et al.  Incompletely Informed Shorebirds That Face a Digestive Constraint Maximize Net Energy Gain When Exploiting Patches , 2003, The American Naturalist.

[6]  T. Peake,et al.  Animal Communication Networks: Eavesdropping in communication networks , 2005 .

[7]  John M. McNamara,et al.  Information is a fitness enhancing resource , 2010 .

[8]  Marie-Josée Fortin,et al.  Understanding avian responses to forest boundaries: a case study with chickadee winter flocks , 2000 .

[9]  T. Vincent,et al.  Trade-Offs and Coexistence in Consumer-Resource Models: It all Depends on what and where you Eat , 1996, The American Naturalist.

[10]  James P. Grover,et al.  Simple Rules for Interspecific Dominance in Systems with Exploitative and Apparent Competition , 1994, The American Naturalist.

[11]  R. Ydenberg,et al.  Experimental evidence that migrants adjust usage at a stopover site to trade off food and danger , 2006 .

[12]  Barney Luttbeg,et al.  A Comparative Bayes tactic for mate assessment and choice , 1996 .

[13]  T. Grubb,et al.  Benefits to satellite members in mixed-species foraging groups: an experimental analysis , 1998, Animal Behaviour.

[14]  Lia Hemerik,et al.  Plant-mediated indirect effects and the persistence of parasitoid–herbivore communities , 2001 .

[15]  K. Schmidt.  Site fidelity in habitats with contrasting levels of nest predation and brood parasitism , 2001 .

[16]  R. Fletcher.  Social information and community dynamics: nontarget effects from simulating social cues for management. , 2008, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[17]  J. Elmberg,et al.  Interspecific interactions and co-existence in dabbling ducks: observations and an experiment , 1997, Oecologia.

[18]  I. Lovette,et al.  Experimental evidence for extreme dispersal limitation in tropical forest birds. , 2008, Ecology letters.

[19]  T. Valone,et al.  The Optimization Research Program: Studying Adaptations by Their Function , 1990, The Quarterly Review of Biology.

[20]  D. Stephens.  Variance and the Value of Information , 1989, The American Naturalist.

[21]  F. J. Diego-Rasilla,et al.  Heterospecific call recognition and phonotaxis in the orientation behavior of the marbled newt, Triturus marmoratus , 2004, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[22]  J. Ragusa-Netto.  Vigilance towards raptors by nuclear species in bird mixed flocks in a Brazilian savannah , 2002 .

[23]  Richard H. Wagner,et al.  A taxonomy of biological information , 2010 .

[24]  Mikko Mönkkönen,et al.  Numerical and behavioural responses of migrant passerines to experimental manipulation of resident tits (Parus spp.): heterospecific attraction in northern breeding bird communites? , 1990, Oecologia.

[25]  Marc Bélisle,et al.  Gap-crossing decisions by forest birds: an empirical basis for parameterizing spatially-explicit, individual-based models , 2002, Landscape Ecology.

[26]  R. Magrath,et al.  Flights of fear: a mechanical wing whistle sounds the alarm in a flocking bird , 2009, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[27]  J. Pechenik.  Larval experience and latent effects--metamorphosis is not a new beginning. , 2006, Integrative and comparative biology.

[28]  L. Fahrig,et al.  Connectivity is a vital element of landscape structure , 1993 .

[29]  Mikko Mönkkönen,et al.  Heterospecific attraction among forest birds: a review , 2002 .

[30]  John L. Quinn,et al.  Noise, predation risk compensation and vigilance in the chaffinch Fringilla coelebs , 2006 .

[31]  Jan A. van Gils,et al.  State-dependent Bayesian foraging on spatially autocorrelated food distributions , 2010 .

[32]  Donald H. Owings,et al.  The effects of wind turbines on antipredator behavior in California ground squirrels (Spermophilus beecheyi) , 2006 .

[33]  O. Schmitz,et al.  Predator and Prey Models with Flexible Individual Behavior and Imperfect Information , 2000, The American Naturalist.

[34]  E. Danchin,et al.  Informed Dispersal: Prospecting by Birds for Breeding Sites , 1999 .

[35]  C. Bradshaw,et al.  Tropical turmoil: a biodiversity tragedy in progress , 2009 .

[36]  Eastern chipmunks increase their perception of predation risk in response to titmouse alarm calls , 2008 .

[37]  The Maintenance of Phenotypic Plasticity as a Signal Detection Problem , 1996, The American Naturalist.

[38]  P. Gaddis.  Differential Usage of Song Types by Plain, Bridled and Tufted Titmice , 1983 .

[39]  A. Bouskila,et al.  Rules of Thumb for Predation Hazard Assessment: Predictions from a Dynamic Model , 1992, The American Naturalist.

[40]  Claire Doutrelant,et al.  Timing of prospecting and the value of information in a colonial breeding bird , 1996 .

[41]  T. Tveraa,et al.  Public information affects breeding dispersal in a colonial bird: kittiwakes cue on neighbours , 2008, Biology Letters.

[42]  M. Rodríguez-Gironés,et al.  Density-Dependent Patch Exploitation and Acquisition of Environmental Information , 1997, Theoretical population biology.

[43]  Thomas J. Valone,et al.  Are animals capable of Bayesian updating? An empirical review , 2006 .

[44]  M. Donahue.  Allee effects and conspecific cueing jointly lead to conspecific attraction , 2006, Oecologia.

[45]  H. Kokko,et al.  Ecological traps in changing environments: Ecological and evolutionary consequences of a behaviourally mediated Allee effect , 2001 .

[46]  E. Greene.  A Diet-Induced Developmental Polymorphism in a Caterpillar , 1989, Science.

[47]  R. Langerhans,et al.  Plasticity constrained: over-generalized induction cues cause maladaptive phenotypes , 2002 .

[48]  G. Beauchamp,et al.  Learning rules for social foragers: implications for the producer-scrounger game and ideal free distribution theory. , 2000, Journal of theoretical biology.

[49]  Kimberly Maute,et al.  HETEROSPECIFIC FACILITATION OF FOREST-BOUNDARY CROSSING BY MOBBING UNDERSTORY BIRDS IN NORTH-CENTRAL FLORIDA , 2004 .

[50]  M. Ward.  Habitat selection by dispersing yellow-headed blackbirds: evidence of prospecting and the use of public information , 2005, Oecologia.

[51]  J. Stamps.  Conspecific Attraction and Aggregation in Territorial Species , 1988, The American Naturalist.

[52]  Adam S Hadley,et al.  Social information trumps vegetation structure in breeding-site selection by a migrant songbird , 2008, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[53]  T. Valone.  From eavesdropping on performance to copying the behavior of others: a review of public information use , 2007, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[54]  B. Doligez,et al.  When to use public information for breeding habitat selection? The role of environmental predictability and density dependence , 2003, Animal Behaviour.

[55]  T. Valone,et al.  Potential disadvantages of using socially acquired information. , 2002, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[56]  Mate selection by repeated inspection: more on pied flycatchers , 1996, Animal Behaviour.

[57]  Anthony Hall,et al.  Plant Circadian Clocks Increase Photosynthesis, Growth, Survival, and Competitive Advantage , 2005, Science.

[58]  Daniel T. Blumstein,et al.  Assessment and decision making in animals: A mechanistic model underlying behavioral flexibility can prevent ambiguity , 1996 .

[59]  R. Bshary,et al.  Red colobus and Diana monkeys provide mutual protection against predators , 1997, Animal Behaviour.

[60]  B. Brook.  Global warming tugs at trophic interactions. , 2009, Journal of Animal Ecology.

[61]  T. Grubb,et al.  Social context affects risk taking by a satellite species in a mixed-species foraging group , 2000 .

[62]  R. Dukas,et al.  Behavioural and ecological consequences of limited attention. , 2002, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[63]  Bruce A. Robertson,et al.  A framework for understanding ecological traps and an evaluation of existing evidence. , 2006, Ecology.

[64]  James S Adelman,et al.  Heterospecific alarm call recognition in a non-vocal reptile , 2007, Biology Letters.

[65]  Marcel E Visser,et al.  Climate change and unequal phenological changes across four trophic levels: constraints or adaptations? , 2009, The Journal of animal ecology.

[66]  William J. Sutherland,et al.  Behavioural models of population growth rates: implications for conservation and prediction , 2002 .

[67]  Carlo H. R. Heip,et al.  Infochemicals structure marine, terrestrial and freshwater food webs: Implications for ecological informatics , 2006, Ecol. Informatics.

[68]  G. Kaiser,et al.  Habitat choice in breeding seabirds: when to cross the information barrier , 1994 .

[69]  S. L. Lima,et al.  Towards a behavioral ecology of ecological landscapes. , 1996, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[70]  N. Moran.  The Evolutionary Maintenance of Alternative Phenotypes , 1992, The American Naturalist.

[71]  L. Giraldeau,et al.  Inadvertent social information in breeding site selection of natal dispersing birds , 2006, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[72]  G. Rosenthal,et al.  Response to perceived predation threat in fiddler crabs: trust thy neighbor as thyself? , 2005, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[73]  C. Whelan,et al.  Nesting in an uncertain world: information and sampling the future , 2010 .

[74]  M. Mönkkönen,et al.  Positive fitness consequences of interspecific interaction with a potential competitor , 2002, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[75]  Ola Olsson,et al.  The foraging benefits of information and the penalty of ignorance , 2006 .

[76]  S. Gilbert.  Ecological developmental biology: developmental biology meets the real world. , 2001, Developmental biology.

[77]  Ola Olsson,et al.  Bayes' theorem and its applications in animal behaviour , 2006 .

[78]  L. Gustafsson,et al.  Competitor density cues for habitat quality facilitating habitat selection and investment decisions , 2008 .

[79]  Christine W. Miller,et al.  The type and timing of social information alters offspring production , 2008, Biology Letters.

[80]  Jason D. Hoeksema,et al.  SPECIALIZATION AND RESOURCE TRADE: BIOLOGICAL MARKETS AS A MODEL OF MUTUALISMS , 1998 .

[81]  Ola Olsson,et al.  Smart, smarter, smartest: foraging information states and coexistence , 2010 .

[82]  K. Zuberbühler,et al.  Mixed-species associations of Diana and Campbell's monkeys : the costs and benefits of a forest phenomenon , 2003 .

[83]  G. Horváth,et al.  Why do mayflies lay their eggs en masse on dry asphalt roads? Water-imitating polarized light reflected from asphalt attracts Ephemeroptera. , 1998, The Journal of experimental biology.

[84]  R. McCauley,et al.  Settlement-stage coral reef fish prefer the higher-frequency invertebrate-generated audible component of reef noise , 2008, Animal Behaviour.

[85]  M. Gilpin,et al.  The effect of conspecific attraction on metapopulation dynamics , 1991 .

[86]  A. Houston,et al.  Assessing predation risk: optimal behaviour and rules of thumb. , 2003, Theoretical population biology.

[87]  A. Pomeroy.  Tradeoffs between food abundance and predation danger in spatial usage of a stopover site by western sandpipers, Calidris mauri , 2006 .

[88]  Marc Bélisle,et al.  MEASURING LANDSCAPE CONNECTIVITY: THE CHALLENGE OF BEHAVIORAL LANDSCAPE ECOLOGY , 2005 .

[89]  R. Ostfeld,et al.  Spatial heterogeneity in predator activity, nest survivorship, and nest-site selection in two forest thrushes , 2006, Oecologia.

[90]  M. A. Lewis,et al.  Modelling territoriality and wolf–deer interactions , 1993, Nature.

[91]  Jean-Baptiste Mihoub,et al.  Breeding habitat selection behaviors in heterogeneous environments: implications for modeling reintroduction , 2009 .

[92]  A. Cowling,et al.  Role of mixed‐species flocks in the use of adjacent savannas by forest birds in the central Cerrado, Brazil , 2006 .

[93]  H. Pulliam,et al.  Sources, Sinks, and Habitat Selection: A Landscape Perspective on Population Dynamics , 1991, The American Naturalist.

[94]  J. Rotenberry,et al.  Silent night: adaptive disappearance of a sexual signal in a parasitized population of field crickets , 2006, Biology Letters.

[95]  S. Peacor.  Phenotypic modifications to conspecific density arising from predation risk assessment , 2003 .

[96]  Eben Goodale,et al.  ALARM CALLING IN SRI LANKAN MIXED-SPECIES BIRD FLOCKS , 2005 .

[97]  J. Tella,et al.  Erosion of animal cultures in fragmented landscapes , 2007 .

[98]  Joel s. Brown,et al.  The Ecology of Fear: Optimal Foraging, Game Theory, and Trophic Interactions , 1999 .

[99]  P. Sherman,et al.  Ecological and evolutionary traps. , 2002 .

[100]  M. Massot,et al.  CONSPECIFIC REPRODUCTIVE SUCCESS AND BREEDING HABITAT SELECTION: IMPLICATIONS FOR THE STUDY OF COLONIALITY , 1998 .

[101]  H. Slabbekoorn,et al.  Birdsong and anthropogenic noise: implications and applications for conservation , 2008, Molecular ecology.

[102]  Michael L. Avery,et al.  The versatility of graded acoustic measures in classification of predation threats by the tufted titmouse Baeolophus bicolor: exploring a mixed framework for threat communication , 2010 .

[103]  R. Holt.  IJEE Soapbox: The Unraveling of Nature's Information Webs: The Next Depresing Frontier in Conservation? , 2007 .

[104]  G. Langham,et al.  Why pishing works: Titmouse (Paridae) scolds elicit a generalized response in bird communities , 2006 .

[105]  A I Houston,et al.  Memory and the efficient use of information. , 1987, Journal of theoretical biology.

[106]  M. Mönkkönen,et al.  Positive interactions between migrant and resident birds: testing the heterospecific attraction hypothesis , 2003, Oecologia.

[107]  Kartik Shanker,et al.  Why do birds participate in mixed-species foraging flocks? A large-scale synthesis , 2009, Animal Behaviour.

[108]  Sasha R. X. Dall.  Defining the Concept of Public Information , 2005, Science.

[109]  A. Møller.  Interspecific response to playback of bird song. , 2010 .

[110]  Mikko Mönkkönen,et al.  Social information use is a process across time, space, and ecology, reaching heterospecifics. , 2007, Ecology.

[111]  Richard T. Holmes,et al.  SITE-DEPENDENT REGULATION OF POPULATION SIZE:A NEW SYNTHESIS , 1997 .

[112]  Clobert,et al.  Processes at the origin of similarities in dispersal behaviour among siblings , 2000 .

[113]  Jean Clobert,et al.  Public Information and Breeding Habitat Selection in a Wild Bird Population , 2002, Science.

[114]  Carl T. Bergstrom,et al.  Phenotypic diversity as an adaptation to environmental uncertainty , 2008 .

[115]  Peter Raven,et al.  Human impacts on the rates of recent, present, and future bird extinctions. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[116]  Lenore Fahrig,et al.  Non‐optimal animal movement in human‐altered landscapes , 2007 .

[117]  E. Danchin,et al.  The heterospecific habitat copying hypothesis: can competitors indicate habitat quality? , 2005 .

[118]  E. Jablonka.  Information: Its Interpretation, Its Inheritance, and Its Sharing , 2002, Philosophia Scientiæ.

[119]  Erick Greene,et al.  Allometry of Alarm Calls: Black-Capped Chickadees Encode Information About Predator Size , 2005, Science.

[120]  J. Salminen,et al.  A tree in the eyes of a moth – temporal variation in oak leaf quality and leaf‐miner performance , 2007 .

[121]  Marten Scheffer,et al.  Info-disruption: pollution and the transfer of chemical information between organisms. , 2007, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[122]  J. Clobert,et al.  Blue Tits use fledgling quantity and quality as public information in breeding site choice. , 2007, Ecology.

[123]  L. Ratcliffe,et al.  Inspection of mob-calls as sources of predator information: response of migrant and resident birds in the Neotropics , 2008, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[124]  J. Bascompte,et al.  Patchy Populations in Stochastic Environments: Critical Number of Patches for Persistence , 2002, The American Naturalist.

[125]  Kevin N. Laland,et al.  The role of conformity in foraging when personal and social information conflict , 2004 .

[126]  Anthony Hall,et al.  Ecological implications of plants ability to tell the time. , 2009, Ecology letters.

[127]  O. Olsson,et al.  Optimal Bayesian foraging policies and prey population dynamics-some comments on Rodriguez-Girones and Vasquez. , 2000, Theoretical population biology.

[128]  Carl T. Bergstrom,et al.  The fitness value of information , 2005, Oikos.

[129]  Theunis Piersma,et al.  Differential mortality of wintering shorebirds on the Banc d'Arguin, Mauritania, due to predation by large falcons , 2008 .

[130]  J. McDaniel,et al.  Flexible information sampling in vibrational assessment of predation risk by red-eyed treefrog embryos , 2007, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[131]  M. C. Ferrari,et al.  Learning by embryos and the ghost of predation future , 2008, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[132]  J. Clobert,et al.  Social information and emigration: lessons from immigrants. , 2007, Ecology letters.

[133]  J. Terborgh,et al.  Mixed flocks and polyspecific associations: Costs and benefits of mixed groups to birds and monkeys , 1990, American journal of primatology.

[134]  Kenneth A. Schmidt,et al.  Site fidelity in temporally correlated environments enhances population persistence , 2004 .

[135]  S. L. Lima,et al.  Use of Prey Hotspots by an Avian Predator: Purposeful Unpredictability? , 2006, The American Naturalist.

[136]  K. Sullivan.  Information Exploitation By Downy Woodpeckers in Mixed-Species Flocks , 1984 .

[137]  John Maynard Smith,et al.  The Concept of Information in Biology , 2000, Philosophy of Science.

[138]  Robert J Fletcher,et al.  Emergent properties of conspecific attraction in fragmented landscapes. , 2006, The American naturalist.

[139]  Kevin N Laland,et al.  Nine-spined sticklebacks exploit the most reliable source when public and private information conflict , 2004, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[140]  K. E. Bonnie,et al.  Expanding the scope for social information use , 2007, Animal Behaviour.

[141]  Rufus A Johnstone,et al.  Managing uncertainty: information and insurance under the risk of starvation. , 2002, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[142]  Paul J. B. Hart,et al.  Foraging nine-spined sticklebacks prefer to rely on public information over simpler social cues , 2005 .