A Configurational View on Avatar Design - The Role of Emotional Attachment, Satisfaction, and Cognitive Load in Digital Learning

In online learning settings interactive and meaningful feedback is becoming increasingly important. However, feedback from teachers is oftentimes missing in online learning settings. To overcome challenges that arise from the missing representation of teachers, our study analyzes the relevance of avatar designs in learning settings. We therefore rely on avatars as game design elements and analyze how their design can influence emotional attachment, learning process satisfaction, and extraneous cognitive load in learning. To achieve our goal, we conduct a qualitative comparative analysis with 998 datasets that were collected in a 2x2x2 pre-post online experiment that was developed to train participants in learning functions in Excel. Our results indicate that interaction, familiarity, motivation, and aesthetic experiences are important configurations for avatars that are used in learning. We contribute to different streams of theory such as self-expansion and guide practitioners by providing implications about how to create meaningful avatar designs for learning applications.

[1]  C. W. Park,et al.  The Ties That Bind: Measuring the Strength of Consumers’ Emotional Attachments to Brands , 2005 .

[2]  P. Pintrich A Motivational Science Perspective on the Role of Student Motivation in Learning and Teaching Contexts. , 2003 .

[3]  Antonio P. Gutierrez,et al.  The role of emotion in the learning process: Comparisons between online and face-to-face learning settings , 2012, Internet High. Educ..

[4]  Anthony Steed,et al.  The impact of a self-avatar on cognitive load in immersive virtual reality , 2016, 2016 IEEE Virtual Reality (VR).

[5]  Radhika Santhanam,et al.  Gamified Technology-Mediated Learning: the Role of Individual differences , 2016, PACIS.

[6]  F. Paas,et al.  Cognitive load theory and aging: effects of worked examples on training efficiency , 2002 .

[7]  Jaeki Song,et al.  An Exploratory Study of Social Factors Influencing Virtual Community Members' Satisfaction with Avatars , 2007, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[8]  Robert P. Bostrom,et al.  Technology-Mediated Learning: A Comprehensive Theoretical Model , 2009, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[9]  Hongki Kim,et al.  What If Your Avatar Looks Like You? Dual-Congruity Perspectives for Avatar Use , 2011, MIS Q..

[10]  Michael J. Singer,et al.  Measuring Presence in Virtual Environments: A Presence Questionnaire , 1998, Presence.

[11]  Thomas Greckhamer,et al.  Configurational Theory and Methods in Organizational Research Chapter 3 The Two QCAs : From a Small-N to a Large-N Set Theoretic Approach , 2013 .

[12]  Deborah I. Fels,et al.  Gamification in theory and action: A survey , 2015, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[13]  John L. Sherry,et al.  Orientations to Video Games Among Gender and Age Groups , 2010 .

[14]  Kenton O'Hara,et al.  Gamification. using game-design elements in non-gaming contexts , 2011, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[15]  Paul Ayres,et al.  Investigating the influence of transitory information and motivation during instructional animations , 2008, ICLS.

[16]  Viswanath Venkatesh,et al.  Why Don't Men Ever Stop to Ask for Directions? Gender, Social Influence, and Their Role in Technology Acceptance and Usage Behavior , 2000, MIS Q..

[17]  Sebastian Lins,et al.  Gamifying Information Systems - a synthesis of Gamification mechanics and Dynamics , 2014, ECIS.

[18]  J. Ferguson,et al.  Length of online course and student satisfaction, perceived learning, and academic performance , 2010 .

[19]  J. Sweller COGNITIVE LOAD THEORY, LEARNING DIFFICULTY, AND INSTRUCTIONAL DESIGN , 1994 .

[20]  F. Paas,et al.  Cognitive Load Theory and Instructional Design: Recent Developments , 2003 .

[21]  C. Fornell,et al.  Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. , 1981 .

[22]  Robert P. Bostrom,et al.  End-user training methods: what we know, need to know , 2006, SIGMIS CPR '06.

[23]  Christian Burgers,et al.  How feedback boosts motivation and play in a brain-training game , 2015, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[24]  Ayoung Suh,et al.  Gamification in the Workplace: The Central Role of the Aesthetic Experience , 2017, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[25]  S. Verweij Set-theoretic methods for the social sciences: a guide to qualitative comparative analysis , 2013 .

[26]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  Design Principles for Special Purpose, Embodied, Conversational Intelligence with Environmental Sensors (SPECIES) Agents , 2011 .

[27]  Scott Thiebes,et al.  What's in the Game? Developing a Taxonomy of Gamification Concepts for Health Apps , 2018, HICSS.

[28]  Eduardo Salas,et al.  Toward a Taxonomy Linking Game Attributes to Learning , 2012 .

[29]  R. Mayer,et al.  Nine Ways to Reduce Cognitive Load in Multimedia Learning , 2003 .

[30]  Cindy Hazan,et al.  Pair bonds as attachments: Evaluating the evidence. , 1999 .

[31]  Katheryn R. Christy,et al.  Transportability and Presence as Predictors of Avatar Identification Within Narrative Video Games , 2016, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[32]  Cynthia D. Fisher,et al.  Why do lay people believe that satisfaction and performance are correlated? possible sources of a commonsense theory , 2003 .

[33]  Jacquelyn J. Chini,et al.  Learning from avatars: Learning assistants practice physics pedagogy in a classroom simulator , 2016 .

[34]  J. Sweller,et al.  Cognitive Load Theory and Complex Learning: Recent Developments and Future Directions , 2005 .

[35]  Ian Oakley,et al.  Show Me or Tell Me: Designing Avatars for Feedback , 2015, Interact. Comput..

[36]  Self-Determination Theory,et al.  New Orientations in Language Learning Motivation , 2006 .

[37]  Robert P. Bostrom,et al.  An Investigation of the Appropriation of Technology-Mediated Training Methods Incorporating Enactive and Collaborative Learning , 2013, Inf. Syst. Res..

[38]  Seung-Eun Lee,et al.  An exploratory study of using 3D avatars as online salespeople , 2015 .

[39]  Paul Jen-Hwa Hu,et al.  Technology-assisted learning: a longitudinal field study of knowledge category, learning effectiveness and satisfaction in language learning , 2007, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[40]  Barbara Means,et al.  Evaluation of Evidence-Based Practices in Online Learning: A Meta-Analysis and Review of Online Learning Studies , 2009 .

[41]  Radhika Santhanam,et al.  Research Note - Gamification of Technology-Mediated Training: Not All Competitions Are the Same , 2016, Inf. Syst. Res..

[42]  Ismael Pascual-Nieto,et al.  An exploratory study on how children interact with pedagogic conversational agents , 2013, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[43]  Andreas Janson,et al.  It's about Understanding Each Other's Culture - Improving the Outcomes of Mobile Learning by Avoiding Culture Conflicts , 2016, ICIS.

[44]  Heshan Sun,et al.  The role of moderating factors in user technology acceptance , 2006, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[45]  P O O N A,et al.  Intrinsic Motivation and Academic Achievement What Does Their Relationship Imply for the Classroom Teacher ? , 2010 .

[46]  Peer C. Fiss Building Better Causal Theories: A Fuzzy Set Approach to Typologies in Organization Research , 2011 .

[47]  Bin Xu,et al.  Personality-targeted Gamification: A Survey Study on Personality Traits and Motivational Affordances , 2016, CHI.

[48]  Charles C. Ragin,et al.  Qualitative Comparative Analysis Using Fuzzy Sets (fsQCA) , 2008 .

[49]  E. Deci,et al.  Need Satisfaction, Motivation, and Well-Being in the Work Organizations of a Former Eastern Bloc Country: A Cross-Cultural Study of Self-Determination , 2001 .

[50]  Telle Hailikari,et al.  The relevance of prior knowledge in learning and instructional design. , 2008, American journal of pharmaceutical education.

[51]  Robert K. Atkinson,et al.  Animated agents and learning: Does the type of verbal feedback they provide matter? , 2013, Comput. Educ..

[52]  Kun Chang Lee,et al.  A cognitive map-driven avatar design recommendation DSS and its empirical validity , 2008, Decis. Support Syst..

[53]  Sean B. Eom,et al.  Understanding e-Learners ’ Satisfaction with Learning Management Systems , 2014 .

[54]  Yvonne Rogers,et al.  Informing the design of a virtual environment to support learning in children , 2001, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[55]  Arthur Aron,et al.  When similars do not attract: Tests of a prediction from the self-expansion model , 2006 .

[56]  Katheryn R. Christy,et al.  Leaderboards in a virtual classroom: A test of stereotype threat and social comparison explanations for women's math performance , 2014, Comput. Educ..

[57]  Alexander Benlian,et al.  Anthropomorphic Information Systems , 2019, Business & Information Systems Engineering.

[58]  V. Shute Focus on Formative Feedback , 2008 .

[59]  Brent A. Mattingly,et al.  The power of one: benefits of individual self-expansion , 2013 .

[60]  R. Felder,et al.  Understanding Student Differences , 2005 .

[61]  Cynthia A. Hoffner,et al.  Young Adults' Wishful Identification With Television Characters: The Role of Perceived Similarity and Character Attributes , 2005 .

[62]  Woonhee Sung,et al.  GREENIFY , 2013 .

[63]  A. Bandura,et al.  Self-regulatory mechanisms governing the impact of social comparison on complex decision making. , 1991 .

[64]  A. Artino Cognitive Load Theory and the Role of Learner Experience: An Abbreviated Review for Educational Practitioners , 2008 .

[65]  Andreas Janson,et al.  Is it all about having Fun? - Developing a Taxonomy to gamify Information Systems , 2018, ECIS.