The relative effectiveness of six powered toothbrushes for dental plaque removal.

During the past three years, a number of new powered toothbrushes have been marketed in the United States. The objective of this study was to compare the single-use plaque removal efficacy of six powered toothbrushes: a new prototype (Crest SpinBrush Pro), Crest SpinBrush, Oral-B Battery, Colgate Motion, Oral-B 3-D Excel, and a Crest experimental toothbrush design. This study was a randomized, controlled, examiner-blind, six-period crossover design, which examined plaque removal with six powered toothbrushes following a single use in 26 subjects. Plaque was scored before and after brushing for one minute using the Turesky, et al. Modification of the Quigley-Hein Index. For statistical comparison, the plaque scores were averaged on a per-subject basis. Each subject had a single whole-mouth average score for baseline and for the exam following a one-minute brushing with their assigned toothbrush. The difference (baseline minus post-brushing) in average scores was calculated and analyzed using an analysis of covariance for a crossover design, with baseline whole-mouth average score as the covariate, and terms in the model for subjects, periods, and treatments. Mean baseline plaque scores ranged from 1.770-1.897 for the six toothbrush treatment groups and were not statistically significantly different. Using the analysis of covariance, with respect to all surfaces examined, the new prototype powered toothbrush (Crest SpinBrush Pro) delivered an adjusted mean difference between baseline and post-brushing plaque scores of 0.544, while the five remaining powered toothbrushes delivered an adjusted mean difference of 0.470-0.497. These results represent 10-16% greater plaque removal for the new prototype powered toothbrush. Overall, the six toothbrushes were not statistically significantly different (p = 0.199). However, results of unadjusted pair-wise comparisons conducted per the study protocol found that the new prototype powered toothbrush removed greater levels of plaque than the Oral-B 3-D Excel, Colgate Motion, and Crest experimental toothbrush (p = 0.028, p = 0.038, and p = 0.028, respectively). With respect to buccal and lingual surfaces, the new prototype powered toothbrush (Crest SpinBrush Pro) delivered very similar results relative to the control toothbrushes. Collectively, the results suggest that the new prototype powered toothbrush may offer enhanced plaque removal efficiency relative to the five other toothbrushes, and be at least as good as the five tested powered toothbrushes.

[1]  A. Biesbrock,et al.  Dental plaque removal with two battery-powered toothbrushes. , 2002, American journal of dentistry.

[2]  A. Biesbrock,et al.  Plaque removal efficacy of a battery-operated power toothbrush compared to two control manual toothbrushes in single use studies. , 2002, American journal of dentistry.

[3]  M. Santana,et al.  The clinical effectiveness of a novel power toothbrush and its impact on oral health. , 2002, The journal of contemporary dental practice.

[4]  A. Biesbrock,et al.  Dental plaque removal with a novel battery-powered toothbrush. , 2002, American journal of dentistry.

[5]  A. Biesbrock,et al.  Comparative efficacy of two battery-powered toothbrushes on dental plaque removal. , 2002, The Journal of clinical dentistry.

[6]  Ruhlman Cd,et al.  Plaque removal efficacy of a battery-operated toothbrush compared to a manual toothbrush. , 2001 .

[7]  M. Cugini,et al.  Safety, efficacy and acceptability of a new power toothbrush: a 3-month comparative clinical investigation. , 2001, American journal of dentistry.

[8]  M. Cugini,et al.  A practice-based study of a power toothbrush: assessment of effectiveness and acceptance. , 2000, Journal of the American Dental Association.

[9]  W. Devizio,et al.  Comparative efficacy of the Colgate Actibrush battery-powered toothbrush vs Oral-B CrossAction toothbrush on established plaque and gingivitis: a 6-week clinical study. , 2000, Compendium of continuing education in dentistry. (Jamesburg, N.J. : 1995). Supplement.

[10]  A. Volpe,et al.  Comparative efficacy on supragingival plaque and gingivitis of a manual toothbrush (Colgate Plus) and a battery-powered toothbrush (Colgate Actibrush) over a 30-day period. , 2000, Compendium of continuing education in dentistry. (Jamesburg, N.J. : 1995). Supplement.

[11]  A. Volpe,et al.  Comparison of gingivitis and plaque efficacy of a battery-powered toothbrush and an ADA-provided manual toothbrush. , 2000, Compendium of continuing education in dentistry. (Jamesburg, N.J. : 1995). Supplement.

[12]  A. Volpe,et al.  Effectiveness of a battery-powered toothbrush on plaque removal: comparison with four manual toothbrushes. , 2000, Compendium of continuing education in dentistry. (Jamesburg, N.J. : 1995). Supplement.

[13]  W. Devizio,et al.  Comparative efficacy of a new battery-powered toothbrush and an electric toothbrush on plaque removal. , 2000, Compendium of continuing education in dentistry. (Jamesburg, N.J. : 1995). Supplement.

[14]  M. Cronin,et al.  A 3-month clinical investigation comparing the safety and efficacy of a novel electric toothbrush (Braun Oral-B 3D Plaque Remover) with a manual toothbrush. , 1998, American journal of dentistry.

[15]  P. Warren,et al.  Clinical plaque removing efficacy of a new power toothbrush. , 1998, American journal of dentistry.

[16]  P. Warren,et al.  A comparison of the efficacy of a novel electric toothbrush and a manual toothbrush in the treatment of gingivitis. , 1998, American journal of dentistry.

[17]  P. Warren,et al.  The role of the electric toothbrush in the control of plaque and gingivitis: a review of 5 years clinical experience with the Braun Oral-B Plaque Remover [D7]. , 1996, American journal of dentistry.

[18]  S. Yankell,et al.  A thirty-day evaluation of the Rowenta Dentiphant powered toothbrush in children for safety and efficacy. , 1996, The Journal of clinical dentistry.

[19]  G A Van der Weijden,et al.  A comparative study of electric toothbrushes for the effectiveness of plaque removal in relation to toothbrushing duration. Timerstudy. , 1993, Journal of clinical periodontology.

[20]  M. Timmerman,et al.  The plaque-removing efficacy of an oscillating/rotating toothbrush. A short-term study. , 1993, Journal of clinical periodontology.

[21]  A. Kingman Statistical vs clinical significance in product testing: can they be designed to satisfy equivalence? , 1992, Journal of public health dentistry.

[22]  I Glickman,et al.  Reduced plaque formation by the chloromethyl analogue of victamine C. , 1970, Journal of periodontology.