Remote monitoring of cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIED).

With increasing indications and access to cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) worldwide, the number of patients needing CIED follow-up continues to rise. In parallel, the technology available for managing these devices has advanced considerably. In this setting, remote monitoring (RM) has emerged as a complement to routine in-office care. Rigorous studies, randomized and otherwise, have demonstrated advantages to patient with CIED management systems, which incorporates RM resulting in authoritative guidelines from relevant professional societies recommending RM for all eligible patients. In addition to clinical benefits, CIED management programs that include RM have been shown to be cost effective and associated with high patient satisfaction. Finally, RM programs hold promise for the future of CIED research in light of the massive data collected through RM databases converging with unprecedented computational capability. This review outlines the available data associated with clinical outcomes in patients managed with RM with an emphasis on randomized trials; the impact of RM on patient satisfaction, cost-effectiveness, and healthcare utilization; and possible future directions for the use of RM in clinical practice and research.

[1]  Renato Pietro Ricci,et al.  HRS Expert Consensus Statement on remote interrogation and monitoring for cardiovascular implantable electronic devices. , 2015, Heart rhythm.

[2]  R. Schweikert,et al.  Efficacy and Safety of Automatic Remote Monitoring for Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Follow-Up: The Lumos-T Safely Reduces Routine Office Device Follow-Up (TRUST) Trial , 2010, Circulation.

[3]  Renato Pietro Ricci,et al.  Remote control of implanted devices through Home Monitoring technology improves detection and clinical management of atrial fibrillation. , 2008, Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[4]  P. Heidenreich,et al.  Long-Term Outcome After ICD and CRT Implantation and Influence of Remote Device Follow-Up: The ALTITUDE Survival Study , 2010, Circulation.

[5]  Michel Chauvin,et al.  Potential Cost Savings by Telemedicine‐Assisted Long‐Term Care of Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator Recipients , 2005, Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE.

[6]  H. Heidbuchel,et al.  EuroEco (European Health Economic Trial on Home Monitoring in ICD Patients): a provider perspective in five European countries on costs and net financial impact of follow-up with or without remote monitoring , 2014, European heart journal.

[7]  M. Dick,et al.  Cardiac implantable electronic device remote monitoring surveillance in pediatric and congenital heart disease: Utility relative to frequency. , 2015, Heart rhythm.

[8]  R. Hauser,et al.  Deaths caused by the failure of Riata and Riata ST implantable cardioverter-defibrillator leads. , 2012, Heart rhythm.

[9]  H. Burri,et al.  Cost–consequence analysis of daily continuous remote monitoring of implantable cardiac defibrillator and resynchronization devices in the UK , 2013, Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[10]  Niraj Varma,et al.  Remote monitoring of cardiovascular devices: a time and activity analysis. , 2012, Heart rhythm.

[11]  A. Boyle,et al.  The CONNECT (Clinical Evaluation of Remote Notification to Reduce Time to Clinical Decision) trial: the value of wireless remote monitoring with automatic clinician alerts. , 2011, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[12]  Gillian D Sanders,et al.  Remote Monitoring of Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators versus Quarterly Device Interrogations in Clinic: Results from a Randomized Pilot Clinical Trial , 2010, Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology.

[13]  M. Silka,et al.  Current Practices in the Monitoring of Cardiac Rhythm Devices in Pediatrics and Congenital Heart Disease , 2015, Pediatric Cardiology.

[14]  Suneet Mittal,et al.  The modern EP practice: EHR and remote monitoring. , 2014, Cardiology clinics.

[15]  Dominique Lacroix,et al.  Contributions of remote monitoring to the follow-up of implantable cardioverter–defibrillator leads under advisory , 2010, European heart journal.

[16]  D. Weiss,et al.  Remote Monitoring of Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators: , 2004, Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE.

[17]  H. Mond,et al.  The 11th World Survey of Cardiac Pacing and Implantable Cardioverter‐Defibrillators: Calendar Year 2009–A World Society of Arrhythmia's Project , 2011, Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE.

[18]  F. Oliva,et al.  Monitoring Intrathoracic Impedance with an Implantable Defibrillator Reduces Hospitalizations in Patients with Heart Failure , 2009, Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE.

[19]  A. de Silvestri,et al.  Economic impact of remote patient monitoring: an integrated economic model derived from a meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials in heart failure , 2011, European journal of heart failure.

[20]  A. Lazarus Remote, Wireless, Ambulatory Monitoring of Implantable Pacemakers, Cardioverter Defibrillators, and Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Systems: Analysis of a Worldwide Database , 2007, Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE.

[21]  Renato Pietro Ricci,et al.  Telemedicine and cardiac implants: what is the benefit? , 2012, European heart journal.

[22]  R. Ricci,et al.  Implantable cardioverter defibrillator remote monitoring is well accepted and easy to use during long-term follow-up , 2014, Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology.

[23]  Wojciech Zareba,et al.  ISHNE/EHRA expert consensus on remote monitoring of cardiovascular implantable electronic devices (CIEDs). , 2012, Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[24]  A. Dhala,et al.  Inappropriate Shocks in Patients With Fidelis® Lead Fractures: Impact of Remote Monitoring and the Lead Integrity Algorithm , 2011, Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology.

[25]  R. Shaw,et al.  Remote Monitoring of Implantable Pacemakers: In‐Office Setup Significantly Improves Successful Data Transmission , 2013, Clinical cardiology.

[26]  G. Lip,et al.  Randomized trial of atrial arrhythmia monitoring to guide anticoagulation in patients with implanted defibrillator and cardiac resynchronization devices. , 2015, European heart journal.

[27]  Frank Beckers,et al.  Cryptogenic stroke and underlying atrial fibrillation. , 2014, The New England journal of medicine.

[28]  Hongyan Qiao,et al.  Clinical benefits of remote versus transtelephonic monitoring of implanted pacemakers. , 2009, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[29]  M. Linnaluoto,et al.  Remote monitoring of implantable cardioverter defibrillator patients: a safe, time-saving, and cost-effective means for follow-up , 2008, Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[30]  Haran Burri,et al.  The MOnitoring Resynchronization dEvices and CARdiac patiEnts (MORE-CARE) Randomized Controlled Trial: Phase 1 Results on Dynamics of Early Intervention With Remote Monitoring , 2013, Journal of medical Internet research.

[31]  G. Hindricks,et al.  Quarterly vs. yearly clinical follow-up of remotely monitored recipients of prophylactic implantable cardioverter-defibrillators: results of the REFORM trial , 2013, European heart journal.

[32]  Dominique Lacroix,et al.  Costs of remote monitoring vs. ambulatory follow-ups of implanted cardioverter defibrillators in the randomized ECOST study , 2013, Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[33]  R. Ricci,et al.  Effect of daily remote monitoring on pacemaker longevity: a retrospective analysis. , 2015, Heart rhythm.

[34]  Finn Kensing,et al.  Patient satisfaction and suggestions for improvement of remote ICD monitoring , 2012, Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology.

[35]  Chunliu Zhan,et al.  Cardiac Device Implantation in the United States from 1997 through 2004: A Population-based Analysis , 2007, Journal of General Internal Medicine.

[36]  Dominique Lacroix,et al.  A randomized study of remote follow-up of implantable cardioverter defibrillators: safety and efficacy report of the ECOST trial , 2012, European heart journal.

[37]  J. Piccini,et al.  The Relationship Between Level of Adherence to Automatic Wireless Remote Monitoring and Survival in Pacemaker and Defibrillator Patients. , 2015, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[38]  R. Mahajan,et al.  Remote Monitoring of Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillators: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Clinical Outcomes. , 2015, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[39]  M. Santini,et al.  Rationale and design of the health economics evaluation registry for remote follow-up: TARIFF , 2012, Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[40]  Sana M. Al-Khatib,et al.  Combined heart failure device diagnostics identify patients at higher risk of subsequent heart failure hospitalizations: results from PARTNERS HF (Program to Access and Review Trending Information and Evaluate Correlation to Symptoms in Patients With Heart Failure) study. , 2010, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[41]  Philippe Mabo,et al.  A randomized trial of long-term remote monitoring of pacemaker recipients (The COMPAS trial) , 2011, European heart journal.

[42]  J. Talmon,et al.  Remote monitoring and follow-up of cardiovascular implantable electronic devices in the Netherlands , 2012, Netherlands Heart Journal.

[43]  L. Calò,et al.  A prospective comparison of remote monitoring systems in implantable cardiac defibrillators: potential effects of frequency of transmissions , 2015, Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology.

[44]  A. Capucci,et al.  Subclinical atrial fibrillation and the risk of stroke. , 2012, The New England journal of medicine.

[45]  Maurizio Marzegalli,et al.  Remote Monitoring Reduces Healthcare Use and Improves Quality of Care in Heart Failure Patients With Implantable Defibrillators: The Evolution of Management Strategies of Heart Failure Patients With Implantable Defibrillators (EVOLVO) Study , 2012, Circulation.

[46]  J. Brachmann,et al.  Rationale and design of the MONITOR-ICD study: a randomized comparison of economic and clinical effects of automatic remote MONITORing versus control in patients with Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators. , 2014, American heart journal.

[47]  M. Borggrefe,et al.  Intrathoracic Impedance Monitoring, Audible Patient Alerts, and Outcome in Patients With Heart Failure , 2011, Circulation.

[48]  D. Corrado,et al.  Pacemaker Remote Monitoring in the Pediatric Population: Is It A Real Solution? , 2015, Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE.

[49]  C. Gornick,et al.  Early failure of a small-diameter high-voltage implantable cardioverter-defibrillator lead. , 2007, Heart rhythm.

[50]  Wojciech Zareba,et al.  Reduction in inappropriate therapy and mortality through ICD programming. , 2012, The New England journal of medicine.

[51]  B. Wilkoff,et al.  Cost efficiency and reimbursement of remote monitoring: a US perspective. , 2013, Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[52]  A. Verma,et al.  Canadian Cardiovascular Society/Canadian Heart Rhythm Society joint position statement on the use of remote monitoring for cardiovascular implantable electronic device follow-up. , 2013, The Canadian journal of cardiology.

[53]  Cristina Masella,et al.  CONSORT-EHEALTH Checklist V1.6.2 Report , 2013 .

[54]  A. Chirico,et al.  Economic impact of remote monitoring on ordinary follow-up of implantable cardioverter defibrillators as compared with conventional in-hospital visits. A single-center prospective and randomized study , 2013, Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology.

[55]  Cristina Masella,et al.  Remote Monitoring of CRT‐ICD: The Multicenter Italian CareLink Evaluation—Ease of Use, Acceptance, and Organizational Implications , 2008, Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE.

[56]  K. Ellenbogen,et al.  Performance of Lead Integrity Alert to Assist in the Clinical Diagnosis of Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator Lead Failures: Analysis of Different Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator Leads , 2013, Circulation. Arrhythmia and electrophysiology.

[57]  A. Schirdewan,et al.  Potential role of home monitoring to reduce inappropriate shocks in implantable cardioverter-defibrillator patients due to lead failure. , 2008, Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[58]  Renato Pietro Ricci,et al.  Effectiveness of remote monitoring of CIEDs in detection and treatment of clinical and device-related cardiovascular events in daily practice: the HomeGuide Registry , 2013, Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[59]  P. Lercher,et al.  Socio-economic effects and cost saving potential of remote patient monitoring (SAVE-HM trial). , 2013, International journal of cardiology.

[60]  Vivek B. Ajmani,et al.  Compliance with Remote Monitoring of ICDS/CRTDS in a Real‐World Population , 2014, Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE.

[61]  S. Chaudhry,et al.  Use of Remote Monitoring of Newly Implanted Cardioverter-Defibrillators: Insights From the Patient Related Determinants of ICD Remote Monitoring (PREDICT RM) Study , 2013, Circulation.

[62]  Renato Pietro Ricci,et al.  Long-term patient acceptance of and satisfaction with implanted device remote monitoring. , 2010, Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[63]  G. Hindricks,et al.  Implant-based multiparameter telemonitoring of patients with heart failure (IN-TIME): a randomised controlled trial , 2014, The Lancet.

[64]  S. Priori,et al.  HRS/EHRA expert consensus on the monitoring of cardiovascular implantable electronic devices (CIEDs): description of techniques, indications, personnel, frequency and ethical considerations. , 2008, Heart rhythm.