Influences of encoding and retrieval on the steady-state visual evoked potential

The steady-state visual evoked potential (SSVEP) is a powerful tool to study basic perceptual functions in the human electroencephalogram (EEG) (e.g. selective attention). The present study aimed at finding support for the SSVEP’s sensitivity to higher cognitive functions (e.g. memory). We tagged pictures of meaningless objects with 15 Hz within a combined subsequent-memory and recognition-memory design. The EEG was recorded from 128 electrodes. The subsequent-memory design revealed that SSVEPs are influenced by encoding-related processes. In particular, successful encoding was associated with higher SSVEP amplitudes at central-parietal scalp electrodes and reduced activity at left occipital sites. Recognition memory led to higher SSVEP amplitudes at right temporal scalp regions and to an amplitude reduction at midline electrodes. For the first time it was demonstrated that the SSVEP technique is a useful tool to study memory encoding and retrieval. SSVEPs might reflect the ongoing dynamics within an externally driven and widespread task-relevant network. This offers remarkable possibilities for future research on electrophysiological correlates of mnemonic functioning.

[1]  R N Henson,et al.  Depth of processing effects on neural correlates of memory encoding: relationship between findings from across- and within-task comparisons. , 2001, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[2]  Alex Martin,et al.  Properties and mechanisms of perceptual priming , 1998, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[3]  D. M. Green,et al.  Signal detection theory and psychophysics , 1966 .

[4]  Matthias M. Müller,et al.  Effects of spatial selective attention on the steady-state visual evoked potential in the 20-28 Hz range. , 1998, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[5]  Matthias M Müller,et al.  Attentional Bias to Briefly Presented Emotional Distractors Follows a Slow Time Course in Visual Cortex , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[6]  P. Nunez,et al.  Steady state visually evoked potential (SSVEP) topography in a graded working memory task. , 2001, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[7]  Richard N. A. Henson,et al.  Event-related Potentials Associated with Masked Priming of Test Cues Reveal Multiple Potential Contributions to Recognition Memory , 2008, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[8]  S. A. Hillyard,et al.  Sustained division of the attentional spotlight , 2003, Nature.

[9]  M. Rugg,et al.  When more means less neural activity related to unsuccessful memory encoding , 2001, Current Biology.

[10]  M. Rugg,et al.  Electrophysiological correlates of memory encoding are task-dependent. , 2001, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[11]  R. Srinivasan,et al.  Nonlinear SSVEP responses are sensitive to the perceptual binding of visual hemifields during conventional ‘eye’ rivalry and interocular ‘percept’ rivalry , 2009, Brain Research.

[12]  R. Buckner,et al.  Neural Correlates of Episodic Retrieval Success , 2000, NeuroImage.

[13]  A. Cichocki,et al.  Steady-state visually evoked potentials: Focus on essential paradigms and future perspectives , 2010, Progress in Neurobiology.

[14]  Uwe Hassler,et al.  Steady-state visually evoked potential correlates of object recognition memory , 2003 .

[15]  M. Rugg,et al.  Event-related potentials and recognition memory , 2007, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[16]  A. Dale,et al.  Building memories: remembering and forgetting of verbal experiences as predicted by brain activity. , 1998, Science.

[17]  Ulla Martens,et al.  Perceiving the Tree in the Woods: Segregating Brain Responses to Stimuli Constituting Natural Scenes , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[18]  D Friedman,et al.  Event‐related potential (ERP) studies of memory encoding and retrieval: A selective review , 2000, Microscopy research and technique.

[19]  Søren K. Andersen,et al.  Effects of Feature-selective and Spatial Attention at Different Stages of Visual Processing , 2011, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[20]  Andreas Keil,et al.  Additive effects of emotional content and spatial selective attention on electrocortical facilitation. , 2005, Cerebral cortex.

[21]  W. Perlstein,et al.  Steady-state visual evoked potentials reveal frontally-mediated working memory activity in humans , 2003, Neuroscience Letters.