The granule size distribution in an anammox‐based granular sludge reactor affects the conversion—Implications for modeling

Mathematical models are useful tools to optimize the performance of granular sludge reactors. In these models, typically a uniform granule size is assumed for the whole reactor, even though in reality the granules follow a size distribution and the granule size as such affects the process performance. This study assesses the effect of the granule size distribution on the performance of a granular sludge reactor in which autotrophic nitrogen removal is realized through one‐stage partial nitritation–anammox. A comparison is made between different approaches to deal with particle size distributions in one‐dimensional biofilm models, from the use of a single characteristic diameter to applying a multiple compartment model. The results show a clear impact on the conversion efficiency of the way in which particle size distribution is modeled, resulting from the effect of the granule size on the competition between nitrite oxidizing and anammox bacteria and from the interaction between granules of different sizes in terms of the exchange of solutes. Whereas the use of a uniform granule size is sufficient in case only the overall reactor behavior needs to be assessed, taking into account the detailed granule size distribution is required to study the solute exchange between particles of different sizes. For the latter purpose, the application of the widespread software package Aquasim is limited and the development of dedicated software applications is required. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2012; 109:1629–1636. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

[1]  Susanne Lackner,et al.  Heterotrophic activity compromises autotrophic nitrogen removal in membrane-aerated biofilms: results of a modeling study. , 2008, Water research.

[2]  Mark C M van Loosdrecht,et al.  Segregation of biomass in cyclic anaerobic/aerobic granular sludge allows the enrichment of anaerobic ammonium oxidizing bacteria at low temperatures. , 2011, Environmental science & technology.

[3]  Giuseppe Guglielmi,et al.  Modelling respirometric tests for the assessment of kinetic and stoichiometric parameters on MBBR biofilm for municipal wastewater treatment , 2010, Environ. Model. Softw..

[4]  M. Loosdrecht,et al.  Sewage Treatment with Anammox , 2010, Science.

[5]  M. Loosdrecht,et al.  Evaluating 3-D and 1-D mathematical models for mass transport in heterogeneous biofilms , 2000 .

[6]  W. Verstraete,et al.  Aggregate size and architecture determine biomass activity for one-stage partial nitritation and anammox , 2010 .

[7]  S. Haswell,et al.  Evaluation of heart tissue viability under redox‐magnetohydrodynamics conditions: Toward fine‐tuning flow in biological microfluidics applications , 2012, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[8]  M. V. van Loosdrecht,et al.  Upgrading of sewage treatment plant by sustainable and cost-effective separate treatment of industrial wastewater. , 2010, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[9]  Mark C M van Loosdrecht,et al.  Sensitivity analysis of a biofilm model describing a one-stage completely autotrophic nitrogen removal (CANON) process. , 2002, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[10]  Hanqing Yu,et al.  Modeling a granule‐based anaerobic ammonium oxidizing (ANAMMOX) process , 2009, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[11]  M. Iruela-Arispe,et al.  Macro‐scale topology optimization for controlling internal shear stress in a porous scaffold bioreactor , 2011, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[12]  Cristian Picioreanu,et al.  Multi-scale individual-based model of microbial and bioconversion dynamics in aerobic granular sludge. , 2007, Environmental science & technology.

[13]  E. Bini,et al.  Development of a thermostable β-glucuronidase-based reporter system for monitoring gene expression in hyperthermophiles. , 2012, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[14]  P. Reichert AQUASIM-a tool for simulation and data analysis of aquatic systems , 1994 .

[15]  W Gujer,et al.  A multispecies biofilm model , 1986, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[16]  R. Méndez,et al.  Modelling aerobic granular SBR at variable COD/N ratios including accurate description of total solids concentration. , 2010 .

[17]  M. V. van Loosdrecht,et al.  Kinetic model of a granular sludge SBR: Influences on nutrient removal , 2007, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[18]  Hanqing Yu,et al.  A generalized model for aerobic granule-based sequencing batch reactor. 1. Model development. , 2006, Environmental science & technology.

[19]  J Keller,et al.  The influence of substrate kinetics on the microbial community structure in granular anaerobic biomass. , 2004, Water research.

[20]  Orit Shefi,et al.  Topographic cues of nano‐scale height direct neuronal growth pattern , 2012, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[21]  Willy Verstraete,et al.  Aggregate Size and Architecture Determine Microbial Activity Balance for One-Stage Partial Nitritation and Anammox , 2009, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[22]  M. V. van Loosdrecht,et al.  Microbial community structure in autotrophic nitrifying granules characterized by experimental and simulation analyses. , 2010, Environmental microbiology.

[23]  Wen-Ming Xie,et al.  Granulation of activated sludge in a pilot-scale sequencing batch reactor for the treatment of low-strength municipal wastewater. , 2009, Water research.

[24]  B De Baets,et al.  Effect of granule size on autotrophic nitrogen removal in a granular sludge reactor , 2010, Environmental technology.