Comparison of Above-Water Seabird and TriOS Radiometers along an Atlantic Meridional Transect

The Fiducial Reference Measurements for Satellite Ocean Color (FRM4SOC) project has carried out a range of activities to evaluate and improve the state-of-the-art in ocean color radiometry. This paper described the results from a ship-based intercomparison conducted on the Atlantic Meridional Transect 27 from 23rd September to 5th November 2017. Two different radiometric systems, TriOS-Radiation Measurement Sensor with Enhanced Spectral resolution (RAMSES) and Seabird-Hyperspectral Surface Acquisition System (HyperSAS), were compared and operated side-by-side over a wide range of Atlantic provinces and environmental conditions. Both systems were calibrated for traceability to SI (Systeme international) units at the same optical laboratory under uniform conditions before and after the field campaign. The in situ results and their accompanying uncertainties were evaluated using the same data handling protocols. The field data revealed variability in the responsivity between TRiOS and Seabird sensors, which is dependent on the ambient environmental and illumination conditions. The straylight effects for individual sensors were mostly within ±3%. A near infra-red (NIR) similarity correction changed the water-leaving reflectance (ρw) and water-leaving radiance (Lw) spectra significantly, bringing also a convergence in outliers. For improving the estimates of in situ uncertainty, it is recommended that additional characterization of radiometers and environmental ancillary measurements are undertaken. In general, the comparison of radiometric systems showed agreement within the evaluated uncertainty limits. Consistency of in situ results with the available Sentinel-3A Ocean and Land Color Instrument (OLCI) data in the range from (400…560) nm was also satisfactory (−8% < Mean Percentage Difference (MPD) < 15%) and showed good agreement in terms of the shape of the spectra and absolute values.

[1]  Michael J. Behrenfeld,et al.  Significant contribution of large particles to optical backscattering in the open ocean , 2009 .

[2]  Agnieszka Bialek,et al.  Example of Monte Carlo Method Uncertainty Evaluation for Above-Water Ocean Colour Radiometry , 2020, Remote. Sens..

[3]  S. Gibb,et al.  Improved resolution of mono- and divinyl chlorophylls a and b and zeaxanthin and lutein in phytoplankton extracts using reverse phase C-8 HPLC , 1997 .

[4]  W. Cooper,et al.  Comparison of radiometric quantities measured in water, above water and derived from seaWiFS imagery in the South Atlantic Bight, North Carolina, USA , 2006 .

[5]  G. Zibordi,et al.  An Evaluation of Above- and In-Water Methods for Determining Water-Leaving Radiances , 2002 .

[6]  G. Zibordi,et al.  System Vicarious Calibration for Ocean Color Climate Change Applications: Requirements for In Situ Data , 2015 .

[7]  C. Mobley,et al.  Removal of surface-reflected light for the measurement of remote-sensing reflectance from an above-surface platform. , 2010, Optics express.

[8]  B. Franz,et al.  Sources and assumptions for the vicarious calibration of ocean color satellite observations. , 2008, Applied optics.

[9]  Agnieszka Bialek,et al.  Results from Verification of Reference Irradiance and Radiance Sources Laboratory Calibration Experiment Campaign , 2020, Remote. Sens..

[10]  Marco Talone,et al.  Response to Temperature of a Class of In Situ Hyperspectral Radiometers , 2017 .

[11]  Astrid Bracher,et al.  Field Intercomparison of Radiometers Used for Satellite Validation in the 400-900 nm Range , 2019, Remote. Sens..

[12]  Marco Talone,et al.  Stray light effects in above-water remote-sensing reflectance from hyperspectral radiometers. , 2016, Applied optics.

[13]  Tongji Li,et al.  Error Budget in the Validation of Radiometric Products Derived from OLCI around the China Sea from Open Ocean to Coastal Waters Compared with MODIS and VIIRS , 2019, Remote. Sens..

[14]  Ilmar Ansko,et al.  Consistency of Radiometric Satellite Data over Lakes and Coastal Waters with Local Field Measurements , 2020, Remote. Sens..

[15]  E. Boss,et al.  Underway spectrophotometry along the Atlantic Meridional Transect reveals high performance in satellite chlorophyll retrievals , 2016 .

[16]  K. Ruddick,et al.  In situ determination of the remote sensing reflectance : an inter comparison , 2012 .

[17]  K. Ruddick,et al.  Seaborne measurements of near infrared water‐leaving reflectance: The similarity spectrum for turbid waters , 2006 .

[18]  Martin Huber,et al.  Comparing ground‐level spectrally resolved solar UV measurements using various instruments: A technique resolving effects of wavelength shift and slit width , 1995 .

[19]  Giuseppe Zibordi,et al.  A Regional Assessment of OLCI Data Products , 2018, IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters.

[20]  Davide D'Alimonte,et al.  Field Intercomparison of Radiometer Measurements for Ocean Colour Validation , 2020, Remote. Sens..

[21]  Douglas W. Nychka,et al.  Statistical significance of trends and trend differences in layer-average atmospheric temperature time series , 2000 .

[22]  Robert J. W. Brewin,et al.  The open-ocean missing backscattering is in the structural complexity of particles , 2018, Nature Communications.

[23]  Kevin Ruddick,et al.  Use of the near infrared similarity reflectance spectrum for the quality control of remote sensing data , 2005, SPIE Optics + Photonics.

[24]  Alexandre Castagna,et al.  A Review of Protocols for Fiducial Reference Measurements of WaterLeaving Radiance for Validation of Satellite Remote-Sensing Data over Water , 2019, Remote. Sens..

[25]  Astrid Bracher,et al.  Laboratory Intercomparison of Radiometers Used for Satellite Validation in the 400-900 nm Range , 2019, Remote. Sens..

[26]  L. Prieur,et al.  Analysis of variations in ocean color1 , 1977 .

[27]  Alexandre Castagna,et al.  A Review of Protocols for Fiducial Reference Measurements of Downwelling Irradiance for the Validation of Satellite Remote Sensing Data over Water , 2019, Remote. Sens..