How deeply cells feel: methods for thin gels

Tissue cells lack the ability to see or hear but have evolved mechanisms to feel into their surroundings and sense a collective stiffness. A cell can even sense the effective stiffness of rigid objects that are not in direct cellular contact - like the proverbial princess who feels a pea placed beneath soft mattresses. How deeply a cell feels into a matrix can be measured by assessing cell responses on a controlled series of thin and elastic gels that are affixed to a rigid substrate. Gel elasticity E is readily varied with polymer concentrations of now-standard polyacrylamide hydrogels, but to eliminate wrinkling and detachment of thin gels from an underlying glass coverslip, vinyl groups are bonded to the glass before polymerization. Gel thickness is nominally specified using micron-scale beads that act as spacers, but gels swell after polymerization as measured by z-section, confocal microscopy of fluorescent gels. Atomic force microscopy (AFM) is used to measure E at gel surfaces, employing stresses and strains that are typically generated by cells and yielding values for E that span a broad range of tissue microenvironments. To illustrate cell sensitivities to a series of thin-to-thick gels, the adhesive spreading of mesenchymal stem cells was measured on gel mimics of a very soft tissue (eg. brain, E ~ 1 kPa). Initial results show that cells increasingly respond to the rigidity of an underlying 'hidden' surface starting at about 10-20 microm gel thickness with a characteristic tactile length of less than about 5 microm.

[1]  Dennis E Discher,et al.  Matrix elasticity, cytoskeletal forces and physics of the nucleus: how deeply do cells ‘feel’ outside and in? , 2010, Journal of Cell Science.

[2]  Micah Dembo,et al.  Influence of type I collagen surface density on fibroblast spreading, motility, and contractility. , 2003, Biophysical journal.

[3]  Dennis E. Discher,et al.  Multiscale Mechanics of Fibrin Polymer: Gel Stretching with Protein Unfolding and Loss of Water , 2009, Science.

[4]  Adam J. Engler,et al.  Myotubes differentiate optimally on substrates with tissue-like stiffness , 2004, The Journal of cell biology.

[5]  S. Sen,et al.  Matrix Elasticity Directs Stem Cell Lineage Specification , 2006, Cell.

[6]  Paul A. Janmey,et al.  Non-Linear Elasticity of Extracellular Matrices Enables Contractile Cells to Communicate Local Position and Orientation , 2009, PloS one.

[7]  M. Noda,et al.  Osteopontin Expression in Osteoblasts and Osteocytes During Bone Formation Under Mechanical Stress in the Calvarial Suture In Vivo , 2003, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[8]  Shamik Sen,et al.  Matrix Strains Induced by Cells: Computing How Far Cells Can Feel , 2009, Cellular and molecular bioengineering.

[9]  Kheya Sengupta,et al.  Fibroblast adaptation and stiffness matching to soft elastic substrates. , 2007, Biophysical journal.

[10]  David F Meaney,et al.  Matrices with compliance comparable to that of brain tissue select neuronal over glial growth in mixed cortical cultures. , 2006, Biophysical journal.

[11]  D. O. Stalnaker,et al.  The Poisson Function of Finite Elasticity , 1986 .

[12]  A. Rowlands,et al.  Directing osteogenic and myogenic differentiation of MSCs: interplay of stiffness and adhesive ligand presentation. , 2008, American journal of physiology. Cell physiology.

[13]  C. Patrick,et al.  Rheological and recovery properties of poly(ethylene glycol) diacrylate hydrogels and human adipose tissue. , 2005, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.

[14]  Ueli Aebi,et al.  Dynamic elastic modulus of porcine articular cartilage determined at two different levels of tissue organization by indentation-type atomic force microscopy. , 2004, Biophysical journal.

[15]  C. A. Poole,et al.  Chondrons in cartilage: Ultrastructural analysis of the pericellular microenvironment in adult human articular cartilages , 1987, Journal of Orthopaedic Research.

[16]  K. V. Van Vliet,et al.  Influence of finite thickness and stiffness on cellular adhesion-induced deformation of compliant substrata. , 2008, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[17]  Dennis Discher,et al.  Substrate compliance versus ligand density in cell on gel responses. , 2004, Biophysical journal.

[18]  Zhong Qi Yue,et al.  On elastostatics of multilayered solids subjected to general surface traction , 1996 .

[19]  J. Ward,et al.  MT1-MMP-Deficient Mice Develop Dwarfism, Osteopenia, Arthritis, and Connective Tissue Disease due to Inadequate Collagen Turnover , 1999, Cell.

[20]  P. Janmey,et al.  Tissue Cells Feel and Respond to the Stiffness of Their Substrate , 2005, Science.

[21]  A. Harris,et al.  Silicone rubber substrata: a new wrinkle in the study of cell locomotion. , 1980, Science.

[22]  Dirk Mayer,et al.  Micropatterned silicone elastomer substrates for high resolution analysis of cellular force patterns. , 2007, The Review of scientific instruments.

[23]  Rudolf Merkel,et al.  Cell force microscopy on elastic layers of finite thickness. , 2007, Biophysical journal.

[24]  Joyce Y. Wong,et al.  Surface probe measurements of the elasticity of sectioned tissue, thin gels and polyelectrolyte multilayer films : correlations between substrate stiffness and cell adhesion , 2004 .

[25]  Y. Wang,et al.  Cell locomotion and focal adhesions are regulated by substrate flexibility. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[26]  Lisa A Flanagan,et al.  Neurite branching on deformable substrates , 2002, Neuroreport.

[27]  Takako Kondo,et al.  Sonic hedgehog and retinoic acid synergistically promote sensory fate specification from bone marrow-derived pluripotent stem cells. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[28]  Zhibing Hu,et al.  New method for measuring Poisson's ratio in polymer gels , 1993 .

[29]  M. Radmacher,et al.  Measuring the Elastic Properties of Thin Polymer Films with the Atomic Force Microscope , 1998 .

[30]  J. Andrades,et al.  Selection and amplification of a bone marrow cell population and its induction to the chondro-osteogenic lineage by rhOP-1: an in vitro and in vivo study. , 2001, The International journal of developmental biology.

[31]  Robert Mundt Über die Berührung fester elastischer Körper: Eine allgemeinverständliche Darstellung der Theorie von Heinrich Hertz , 1950 .

[32]  L. Addadi,et al.  Force and focal adhesion assembly: a close relationship studied using elastic micropatterned substrates , 2001, Nature Cell Biology.

[33]  Farshid Guilak,et al.  Zonal Uniformity in Mechanical Properties of the Chondrocyte Pericellular Matrix: Micropipette Aspiration of Canine Chondrons Isolated by Cartilage Homogenization , 2005, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[34]  Thomas Boudou,et al.  An extended modeling of the micropipette aspiration experiment for the characterization of the Young's modulus and Poisson's ratio of adherent thin biological samples: numerical and experimental studies. , 2006, Journal of biomechanics.

[35]  M D McKee,et al.  Molecular and cellular biology of alveolar bone. , 2000, Periodontology 2000.

[36]  G Cossu,et al.  Muscle regeneration by bone marrow-derived myogenic progenitors. , 1998, Science.