Memory predictions are based on ease of processing

Abstract The article reports four experiments that examine people's ability to predict the outcome of a future test of memory. Our thesis is that memory predictions are implicit judgments of how easily the item is processed while answering the predictive question. If items are processed easily because of factors that also cause memory to succeed, predictions are accurate; if the factors that cause easy processing are irrelevant for memory, predictions are less accurate. The experiments examine factors that influence the prediction taks and the memory test separately; these include item attributes, manner of processing, repetition, and similarity of processing between the prediction task and the memory test. Predictions are most accurate if the prediction task entails the same processes as the test, even if the predictive question is nominally irrelevant to the test; predictions are less accurate if the task and test have different entailments, even if the nominal question is specifically aimed at the test.

[1]  E. Tulving INTRATRIAL AND INTERTRIAL RETENTION: NOTES TOWARDS A THEORY OF FREE RECALL VERBAL LEARNING. , 1964, Psychological review.

[2]  Eugene B. Zechmeister,et al.  When you know that you know and when you think that you know but you don't. , 1980 .

[3]  T. O. Nelson,et al.  A comparison of current measures of the accuracy of feeling-of-knowing predictions , 1984 .

[4]  J. Fodor,et al.  The Psychology of Language , 1974 .

[5]  John M. Gardiner,et al.  Memory for remembered events: An assessment of output monitoring in free recall , 1976 .

[6]  G. Bower Imagery as a relational organizer in associative learning , 1970 .

[7]  P. Hertel,et al.  The accuracy of beliefs about retrieval cues , 1986, Memory & cognition.

[8]  I. Begg Imagery and organization in memory: Instructional effects , 1978 .

[9]  Stephen E. Fienberg,et al.  Discrete Multivariate Analysis: Theory and Practice , 1976 .

[10]  George Mandler,et al.  Thinking: From Association To Gestalt , 1964 .

[11]  L. Jacoby,et al.  On the relationship between autobiographical memory and perceptual learning. , 1981, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[12]  I. Begg Acquisition and transfer of meaningful function by meaningless sounds. , 1976 .

[13]  F. Craik,et al.  Aging and metamemory: the roles of relatedness and imagery. , 1982, Journal of gerontology.

[14]  A. Paivio Imagery and verbal processes , 1972 .

[15]  Eugene B. Zechmeister,et al.  Judgments of knowing: The influence of retrieval practice. , 1980 .

[16]  E. J. Rowe,et al.  Continuous judgments of word frequency and familiarity. , 1972 .

[17]  A. Paivio,et al.  Concreteness, imagery, and meaningfulness values for 925 nouns. , 1968, Journal of experimental psychology.

[18]  T. O. Nelson,et al.  Accuracy of Feeling-of-Knowing Judgments for Predicting Perceptual Identification and Relearning , 1984 .

[19]  I. Begg Trace loss and the recognition failure of unrecalled words , 1979 .

[20]  Ian Begg,et al.  On believing what we remember. , 1985 .

[21]  I. Begg Imagery, organization, and discriminative processes. , 1982 .

[22]  J. A. Robinson,et al.  Knowledge of prior recall , 1970 .

[23]  Ian Begg,et al.  On the role of the speaker's expectations in interpersonal communication , 1980 .

[24]  J. Shaughnessy,et al.  Memory monitoring accuracy and modification of rehearsal strategies , 1981 .

[25]  Daniel Kahneman,et al.  Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probability , 1973 .

[26]  I. Begg Imagery and integration in the recall of words. , 1973 .

[27]  M. Blake Prediction of recognition when recall fails: Exploring the feeling-of-knowing phenomenon , 1973 .

[28]  E. Lovelace Metamemory: Monitoring Future Recallability During Study , 1984 .

[29]  I. Begg,et al.  Repetition and trace interaction: Superadditivity , 1988, Memory & cognition.

[30]  J. Hart,et al.  Memory and the feeling-of-knowing experience. , 1965, Journal of educational psychology.

[31]  M. Perlmutter What Is Memory Aging the Aging Of , 1978 .

[32]  Encoding specificity in interpersonal communication , 1985 .

[33]  T. O. Nelson,et al.  A comparison of three predictors of an individual's memory performance: the individual's feeling of knowing versus the normative feeling of knowing versus base-rate item difficulty. , 1986, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[34]  J. Hart,et al.  Memory and the memory-monitoring process , 1967 .

[35]  A. J. Flexser,et al.  Retrieval independence in recognition and recall. , 1978 .

[36]  Thomas Sanocki,et al.  Enhancing Calibration of Comprehension , 1987 .