Vessel segmentation in screening mammograms

Blood vessels are a major cause of false positives in computer aided detection systems for the detection of breast cancer. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to construct a framework for the segmentation of blood vessels in screening mammograms. The proposed framework is based on supervised learning using a cascade classifier. This cascade classifier consists of several stages where in each stage a GentleBoost classifier is trained on Haar-like features. A total of 30 cases were included in this study. In each image, vessel pixels were annotated by selecting pixels on the centerline of the vessel, control samples were taken by annotating a region without any visible vascular structures. This resulted in a total of 31,000 pixels marked as vascular and over 4 million control pixels. After training, the classifier assigns a vesselness likelihood to the pixels. The proposed framework was compared to three other vessel enhancing methods, i) a vesselness filter, ii) a gaussian derivative filter, and iii) a tubeness filter. The methods were compared in terms of area under the receiver operating characteristics curves, the Az values. The Az value of the cascade approach is 0:85. This is superior to the vesselness, Gaussian, and tubeness methods, with Az values of 0:77, 0:81, and 0:78, respectively. From these results, it can be concluded that our proposed framework is a promising method for the detection of vessels in screening mammograms.

[1]  M. Elter,et al.  CADx of mammographic masses and clustered microcalcifications: a review. , 2009, Medical physics.

[2]  L. Tabár,et al.  REDUCTION IN MORTALITY FROM BREAST CANCER AFTER MASS SCREENING WITH MAMMOGRAPHY Randomised Trial from the Breast Cancer Screening Working Group of the Swedish National Board of Health and Welfare , 1985, The Lancet.

[3]  L. Tabár,et al.  Swedish two-county trial: impact of mammographic screening on breast cancer mortality during 3 decades. , 2011, Radiology.

[4]  J. Ferlay,et al.  Cancer incidence and mortality patterns in Europe: estimates for 40 countries in 2012. , 2013, European journal of cancer.

[5]  Karla Kerlikowske,et al.  Comparison of screening mammography in the United States and the United kingdom. , 2003, JAMA.

[6]  S. T. Buckland,et al.  An Introduction to the Bootstrap. , 1994 .

[7]  Christopher J. Taylor,et al.  Finding Orientated Line Patterns in Digital Mammographic Images , 1996, BMVC.

[8]  Nico Karssemeijer,et al.  Detection of stellate distortions in mammograms , 1996, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.

[9]  Rainer Lienhart,et al.  An extended set of Haar-like features for rapid object detection , 2002, Proceedings. International Conference on Image Processing.

[10]  Qiang Li,et al.  Selective enhancement filters for nodules, vessels, and airway walls in two- and three-dimensional CT scans. , 2003, Medical physics.

[11]  Robert Tibshirani,et al.  An Introduction to the Bootstrap , 1994 .

[12]  Eveline A M Heijnsdijk,et al.  Nation-wide data on screening performance during the transition to digital mammography: observations in 6 million screens. , 2013, European journal of cancer.

[13]  Paul A. Viola,et al.  Rapid object detection using a boosted cascade of simple features , 2001, Proceedings of the 2001 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. CVPR 2001.

[14]  Alejandro F. Frangi,et al.  Muliscale Vessel Enhancement Filtering , 1998, MICCAI.

[15]  Antonio Torralba,et al.  Sharing Visual Features for Multiclass and Multiview Object Detection , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[16]  C. Mathers,et al.  Estimates of worldwide burden of cancer in 2008: GLOBOCAN 2008 , 2010, International journal of cancer.

[17]  Yongyi Yang,et al.  Computer-Aided Detection and Diagnosis of Breast Cancer With Mammography: Recent Advances , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine.