Intergrating conventional MRI, texture analysis of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI, and susceptibility weighted imaging for glioma grading
暂无分享,去创建一个
Xun-Ning Hong | Xun-Ning Hong | Chun-Qiu Su | Shan-Shan Lu | Qiu-Yue Han | Mao-Dong Zhou | Shanshan Lu | Xunning Hong | Q. Han | Chunqiu Su | M. Zhou
[1] E. Liouta,et al. Prognostic value of preoperative dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI perfusion parameters for high-grade glioma patients , 2016, Neuroradiology.
[2] K. Peck,et al. Dynamic Contrast‐Enhanced MRI in Low‐Grade Versus Anaplastic Oligodendrogliomas , 2016, Journal of neuroimaging : official journal of the American Society of Neuroimaging.
[3] Glyn Johnson,et al. Glioma grading: sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values of perfusion MR imaging and proton MR spectroscopic imaging compared with conventional MR imaging. , 2003, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.
[4] Seong Ho Park,et al. Glioma: Application of Histogram Analysis of Pharmacokinetic Parameters from T1-Weighted Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MR Imaging to Tumor Grading , 2014, American Journal of Neuroradiology.
[5] A. Waldman,et al. Conventional MRI evaluation of gliomas. , 2011, The British journal of radiology.
[6] S. Heiland,et al. Differentiation of glioblastoma and primary CNS lymphomas using susceptibility weighted imaging. , 2013, European journal of radiology.
[7] Bin Ai,et al. Susceptibility-weighted imaging in grading brain astrocytomas. , 2010, European journal of radiology.
[8] G. Jahng,et al. Semiquantitative Assessment of Intratumoral Susceptibility Signals Using Non-Contrast-Enhanced High-Field High-Resolution Susceptibility-Weighted Imaging in Patients with Gliomas: Comparison with MR Perfusion Imaging , 2009, American Journal of Neuroradiology.
[9] Sumei Wang,et al. Glioma grading by microvascular permeability parameters derived from dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI and intratumoral susceptibility signal on susceptibility weighted imaging , 2015, Cancer Imaging.
[10] L. Mazzoni,et al. Prognostic Value of MR Imaging Texture Analysis in Brain Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Oligo-Metastases Undergoing Stereotactic Irradiation , 2016, Cureus.
[11] Shi Haibin,et al. Clinical applications of susceptibility-weighted imaging in detecting and grading intracranial gliomas: a review , 2013, Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society.
[12] Sabine Van Huffel,et al. Integrating diffusion kurtosis imaging, dynamic susceptibility-weighted contrast-enhanced MRI, and short echo time chemical shift imaging for grading gliomas. , 2014, Neuro-oncology.
[13] Naoki Kagawa,et al. Introduction of High Throughput Magnetic Resonance T2-Weighted Image Texture Analysis for WHO Grade 2 and 3 Gliomas , 2016, PloS one.
[14] E. Haacke,et al. Susceptibility‐Weighted Imaging of Glioma: Update on Current Imaging Status and Future Directions , 2016, Journal of neuroimaging : official journal of the American Society of Neuroimaging.
[15] William D. Dunn,et al. MR imaging predictors of molecular profile and survival: multi-institutional study of the TCGA glioblastoma data set. , 2013, Radiology.
[16] Kyung K Peck,et al. Dynamic Contrast‐Enhanced Perfusion MRI and Diffusion‐Weighted Imaging in Grading of Gliomas , 2015, Journal of neuroimaging : official journal of the American Society of Neuroimaging.
[17] Sang Joon Park,et al. Glioma: Application of Whole-Tumor Texture Analysis of Diffusion-Weighted Imaging for the Evaluation of Tumor Heterogeneity , 2014, PloS one.
[18] A. Falini,et al. Dynamic contrast-enhanced and dynamic susceptibility contrast perfusion MR imaging for glioma grading: Preliminary comparison of vessel compartment and permeability parameters using hotspot and histogram analysis. , 2016, European journal of radiology.
[19] Zhiyun Yang,et al. Quantitative Evaluation of Diffusion and Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MR in Tumor Parenchyma and Peritumoral Area for Distinction of Brain Tumors , 2015, PloS one.
[20] Egill Rostrup,et al. Discrimination between glioma grades II and III in suspected low-grade gliomas using dynamic contrast-enhanced and dynamic susceptibility contrast perfusion MR imaging: a histogram analysis approach , 2014, Neuroradiology.
[21] Teresa Wu,et al. Multi-Parametric MRI and Texture Analysis to Visualize Spatial Histologic Heterogeneity and Tumor Extent in Glioblastoma , 2015, PloS one.
[22] Bal Sanghera,et al. Assessment of tumor heterogeneity: an emerging imaging tool for clinical practice? , 2012, Insights into Imaging.
[23] Massimo Caulo,et al. Data-driven grading of brain gliomas: a multiparametric MR imaging study. , 2014, Radiology.
[24] Michael J Paldino,et al. Fundamentals of quantitative dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging. , 2009, Magnetic resonance imaging clinics of North America.
[25] Peng Cao,et al. Textural features of dynamic contrast‐enhanced MRI derived model‐free and model‐based parameter maps in glioma grading , 2018, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.
[26] Balaji Ganeshan,et al. Diagnostic performance of texture analysis on MRI in grading cerebral gliomas. , 2016, European journal of radiology.
[27] Mauricio Reyes,et al. Fully automatic GBM segmentation in the TCGA-GBM dataset: Prognosis and correlation with VASARI features , 2015, Scientific Reports.
[28] Rajikha Raja,et al. Assessment of tissue heterogeneity using diffusion tensor and diffusion kurtosis imaging for grading gliomas , 2016, Neuroradiology.
[29] Olivier Gevaert,et al. Addition of MR imaging features and genetic biomarkers strengthens glioblastoma survival prediction in TCGA patients. , 2015, Journal of neuroradiology. Journal de neuroradiologie.
[30] Robert M. Haralick,et al. Textural Features for Image Classification , 1973, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern..