STRUCTURAL PARAMETERS OF GALAXIES IN CANDELS
暂无分享,去创建一个
Chien Y. Peng | A. Galametz | A. van der Wel | Yu-Yen Chang | S. M. Faber | Yicheng Guo | H. C. Ferguson | H. Rix | A. V. D. Wel | W. Hartley | H. Ferguson | S. Faber | Yicheng Guo | E. Bell | A. Galametz | N. Grogin | D. Kocevski | E. McGrath | M. Peth | C. Peng | J. Lotz | E. Cheung | J. Kartaltepe | M. Barden | M. Mozena | A. van der Wel | A. M. Koekemoer | E. F. Bell | B. Haussler | E. J. McGrath | D. H. McIntosh | H.-W. Rix | M. Barden | E. Cheung | N. A. Grogin | W. Hartley | J. S. Kartaltepe | D. D. Kocevski | J. Lotz | M. Mozena | M. A. Peth | Yu-Yen Chang | B. Häußler | A. Koekemoer | D. Mcintosh | A. Koekemoer | H. Rix | D. H. Mcintosh | J. Lotz | Edmond Cheung | H. Ferguson | E. Bell | Daniel H. McIntosh
[1] Jose Luis. Sersic,et al. Atlas de Galaxias Australes , 1968 .
[2] Kirpal Nandra,et al. CANDELS: CONSTRAINING THE AGN–MERGER CONNECTION WITH HOST MORPHOLOGIES AT z ∼ 2 , 2011, 1109.2588.
[3] M. Giavalisco,et al. The Great Observatories Origins Deep Survey: Initial results from optical and near-infrared imaging , 2003, astro-ph/0309105.
[4] M. Franx,et al. Hubble Space Telescope and Spitzer Imaging of Red and Blue Galaxies at z ~ 2.5: A Correlation between Size and Star Formation Activity from Compact Quiescent Galaxies to Extended Star-forming Galaxies , 2007, 0707.4484.
[5] Marijn Franx,et al. THE SIZE EVOLUTION OF GALAXIES SINCE Z ∼ 3: COMBINING SDSS, GEMS AND FIRES 1 , 2006 .
[6] Chien Y. Peng,et al. DETAILED DECOMPOSITION OF GALAXY IMAGES. II. BEYOND AXISYMMETRIC MODELS , 2009, 0912.0731.
[7] Asantha Cooray,et al. GOODS-HERSCHEL AND CANDELS: THE MORPHOLOGIES OF ULTRALUMINOUS INFRARED GALAXIES AT z ∼ 2 , 2011, 1110.4057.
[8] G. Illingworth,et al. THE HUBBLE SEQUENCE BEYOND z = 2 FOR MASSIVE GALAXIES: CONTRASTING LARGE STAR-FORMING AND COMPACT QUIESCENT GALAXIES , 2009, 0909.0260.
[9] R. Bouwens,et al. Evolution in the Cluster Early-Type Galaxy Size-Surface Brightness Relation at z ≃1 , 2005, astro-ph/0503365.
[10] I. Smail,et al. The All-Wavelength Extended Groth Strip International Survey (AEGIS) Data Sets , 2006, astro-ph/0607355.
[11] M. Franx,et al. SUBMITTED TO THE ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL Preprint typeset using LATEX style emulateapj v. 10/09/06 DETECTION OF QUIESCENT GALAXIES IN A BICOLOR SEQUENCE FROM Z = 0 − 2 , 2022 .
[12] Kansas,et al. CANDELS OBSERVATIONS OF THE STRUCTURAL PROPERTIES OF CLUSTER GALAXIES AT z = 1.62 , 2011, 1110.3794.
[13] Ssc,et al. REST-FRAME UV–OPTICALLY SELECTED GALAXIES AT 2.3 ≲ z ≲ 3.5: SEARCHING FOR DUSTY STAR-FORMING AND PASSIVELY EVOLVING GALAXIES , 2011, 1110.3801.
[14] M. Irwin,et al. The UKIRT Infrared Deep Sky Survey (UKIDSS) , 2006, astro-ph/0604426.
[15] Chien Y. Peng,et al. GEMS: Galaxy Evolution from Morphologies and SEDs , 2004 .
[16] Marijn Franx,et al. Structure and Star Formation in Galaxies out to z = 3: Evidence for Surface Density Dependent Evolution and Upsizing , 2008, 0808.2642.
[17] A. Fontana,et al. THE NATURE OF EXTREMELY RED H − [4.5] > 4 GALAXIES REVEALED WITH SEDS AND CANDELS , 2012, 1202.0496.
[18] Tucson,et al. THE RELATIVE ABUNDANCE OF COMPACT AND NORMAL MASSIVE EARLY-TYPE GALAXIES AND ITS EVOLUTION FROM REDSHIFT z ∼ 2 TO THE PRESENT , 2011, 1106.4308.
[19] Douglas Scott,et al. The Hubble Space Telescope GOODS NICMOS Survey: Overview and the Evolution of Massive Galaxies at 1.5 < z < 3 , 2010, 1010.1164.
[20] Sergey E. Koposov,et al. GEMS: Galaxy Fitting Catalogs and Testing Parametric Galaxy Fitting Codes: GALFIT and GIM2D , 2007, 0704.2601.
[21] Arizona,et al. CAUGHT IN THE ACT: THE ASSEMBLY OF MASSIVE CLUSTER GALAXIES AT z = 1.62 , 2011, 1110.3821.
[22] Chien Y. Peng,et al. GALAPAGOS: From Pixels to Parameters , 2012, 1203.1831.
[23] Garth D. Illingworth,et al. CONFIRMATION OF THE COMPACTNESS OF A z = 1.91 QUIESCENT GALAXY WITH HUBBLE SPACE TELESCOPE’S WIDE FIELD CAMERA 3 , 2010, 1004.1411.
[24] L. Guzzo,et al. The Cosmic Evolution Survey (COSMOS): Overview* , 2006, astro-ph/0612305.
[25] The K20 survey. VI. The distribution of the stellar masses in galaxies up to z 2 , 2004, astro-ph/0405055.
[26] A. Koekemoer,et al. GALAXY STRUCTURE AND MODE OF STAR FORMATION IN THE SFR–MASS PLANE FROM z ∼ 2.5 TO z ∼ 0.1 , 2011, 1107.0317.
[27] R. Bouwens,et al. Clusters at half hubble time : Galaxy structure and colors in RX J0152.7-1357 and MS 1054-03 , 2006, astro-ph/0603058.
[28] M. Franx,et al. NICMOS Imaging of DRGs in the HDF-S: A Relation between Star Formation and Size at z ~ 2.5 , 2006 .
[29] S. Ravindranath,et al. CANDELS: THE COSMIC ASSEMBLY NEAR-INFRARED DEEP EXTRAGALACTIC LEGACY SURVEY—THE HUBBLE SPACE TELESCOPE OBSERVATIONS, IMAGING DATA PRODUCTS, AND MOSAICS , 2011, 1105.3753.
[30] G. D. Illingworth,et al. ACTIVE AND PASSIVE GALAXIES AT z ∼ 2: REST-FRAME OPTICAL MORPHOLOGIES WITH WFC3 , 2010, 1007.2422.
[31] Konrad Kuijken,et al. THE LUMINOSITY-SIZE AND MASS-SIZE RELATIONS OF GALAXIES OUT TO z ~ 3 , 2004 .
[32] Stijn Wuyts,et al. WHAT TURNS GALAXIES OFF? THE DIFFERENT MORPHOLOGIES OF STAR-FORMING AND QUIESCENT GALAXIES SINCE z ∼ 2 FROM CANDELS , 2011, 1110.3786.
[33] P. Hall,et al. The Multiwavelength Survey by Yale-Chile (MUSYC): Deep Near-Infrared Imaging and the Selection of Distant Galaxies , 2006, astro-ph/0612612.
[34] H. Rix,et al. THE MAJORITY OF COMPACT MASSIVE GALAXIES AT z ∼ 2 ARE DISK DOMINATED , 2011, 1101.2423.
[35] Yicheng Guo,et al. Structural Properties of Central Galaxies in Groups and Clusters , 2009, 0901.1150.
[36] R. Ellis,et al. COSMOS: Hubble Space Telescope Observations , 2006, astro-ph/0612306.
[37] H. Rix,et al. Ultradeep Near-Infrared ISAAC Observations of the Hubble Deep Field South: Observations, Reduction, Multicolor Catalog, and Photometric Redshifts , 2002, astro-ph/0212236.
[38] Stefano Casertano,et al. CANDELS: THE COSMIC ASSEMBLY NEAR-INFRARED DEEP EXTRAGALACTIC LEGACY SURVEY—THE HUBBLE SPACE TELESCOPE OBSERVATIONS, IMAGING DATA PRODUCTS, AND MOSAICS , 2011, 1105.3754.
[39] E. Bertin,et al. SExtractor: Software for source extraction , 1996 .