Capacity and limits of associative memory in pigeons

How much information can a brain store over a lifetime’s experience? The answer to this important, but little researched, question was investigated by looking at the long-term visual memory capacity of 2 pigeons. Over 700 sessions, the pigeons were tested with an increasingly larger pool of pictorial stimuli in a two-alternative discrimination task (incremented in sets of 20 or 30 pictures). Each picture was randomly assigned to either a right or a left choice response, forcing the pigeons to memorize each picture and its associated response. At the end of testing, 1 pigeon was performing at 73% accuracy with a memory set of over 1,800 pictures, and the 2nd was at 76% accuracy with a memory set of over 1,600 pictures. Adjusted for guessing, models of the birds’ performance suggested that the birds had access, on average, to approximately 830 memorized picture—response associations and that these were retained for months at a time. Reaction time analyses suggested that access to these memories was parallel in nature. Over the last 6 months of testing, this capacity estimate was stable for both birds, despite their learning increasingly more items, suggesting some limit on the number of picture—response associations that could be discriminated and retained in the long-term memory portion of this task. This represents the first empirically established limit on long-term memory use for any vertebrate species. The existence of this large exemplar-specific memory capacity has important implications for the evolution of stimulus control and for current theories of avian and human cognition.

[1]  R. Nosofsky Attention, similarity, and the identification-categorization relationship. , 1986, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[2]  J. Kruschke,et al.  Rules and exemplars in category learning. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[3]  A. Wright Concept Learning and Learning Strategies , 1997 .

[4]  Sharon L. Greene,et al.  Pigeon visual memory capacity. , 1984 .

[5]  Alinda Friedman,et al.  Recognizing rotated views of objects: Interpolation versus generalization by humans and pigeons , 2003, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[6]  E. Rosch,et al.  Cognition and Categorization , 1980 .

[7]  L. Standing Learning 10000 pictures , 1973 .

[8]  K. Derrickson YEARLY AND SITUATIONAL CHANGES IN THE ESTIMATE OF REPERTOIRE SIZE IN NORTHERN MOCKINGBIRDS MIMUS-POLYGLOTTOS , 1987 .

[9]  P. Stoddard,et al.  Memory Does Not Constrain Individual Recognition in a Bird With Song Repertoires , 1992 .

[10]  G. A. Miller THE PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW THE MAGICAL NUMBER SEVEN, PLUS OR MINUS TWO: SOME LIMITS ON OUR CAPACITY FOR PROCESSING INFORMATION 1 , 1956 .

[11]  Heinrich H Bülthoff,et al.  Image-based object recognition in man, monkey and machine , 1998, Cognition.

[12]  D E Carter,et al.  Complex learning and information processing by pigeons: a critical analysis. , 1978, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[13]  Nk Logothetis,et al.  Image-based Object Recognition. , 1994 .

[14]  Jonathan Henderson,et al.  Rufous hummingbirds' memory for flower location , 2001, Animal Behaviour.

[15]  Edward A. Wasserman,et al.  Categorical discrimination and generalization in pigeons all negative stimuli are not created equal , 1992 .

[16]  R. Cook,et al.  Pigeon same-different concept learning with multiple stimulus classes. , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[17]  Y. Dudai How big is human memory, or on being just useful enough. , 1997, Learning & memory.

[18]  N. Cowan The magical number 4 in short-term memory: A reconsideration of mental storage capacity , 2001, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[19]  Debbie M. Kelly,et al.  Successive two-item same-different discrimination and concept learning by pigeons , 2003, Behavioural Processes.

[20]  Douglas L. Hintzman,et al.  Judgments of frequency and recognition memory in a multiple-trace memory model. , 1988 .

[21]  C. Mettke-Hofmann,et al.  Long-term memory for a life on the move , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[22]  Charles A. Edwards,et al.  Memorization and “feature selection” in the acquisition of natural concepts in pigeons☆ , 1987 .

[23]  Heinrich H. Bülthoff,et al.  Image-based object recognition , 1995 .

[24]  R. Shepard Recognition memory for words, sentences, and pictures , 1967 .

[25]  S J Chew,et al.  A large-capacity memory system that recognizes the calls and songs of individual birds. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[26]  L. Standing Learning 10,000 pictures. , 1973, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[27]  Gregory Ashby,et al.  A neuropsychological theory of multiple systems in category learning. , 1998, Psychological review.

[28]  R. Herrnstein,et al.  Complex Visual Concept in the Pigeon , 1964, Science.

[29]  Thomas K. Landauer,et al.  How Much do People Remember? Some Estimates of the Quantity of Learned Information in Long-Term Memory , 1986, Cogn. Sci..

[30]  I Biederman,et al.  Seeing things from a different angle: the pigeon's recognition of single geons rotated in depth. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[31]  A. Kamil,et al.  Long-term spatial memory in clark's nutcracker, Nucifraga columbiana , 1992, Animal Behaviour.

[32]  Diana F. Tomback,et al.  How Nutcrackers Find Their Seed Stores , 1980 .