NETWORK STRUCTURAL INFLUENCES ON THE ADOPTION OF EVIDENCE-BASED PREVENTION IN COMMUNITIES.

This study examined the impact of key variables in coalition communication networks, centralization and density, on the adoption of evidence-based substance abuse prevention. Data were drawn from a network survey and a corresponding community leader survey that measured leader attitudes and practices toward substance abuse prevention programs. Two types of coalition networks were measured: advice-seeking and discussion relations. For each community, we computed network-level measurements (n = 20), and then used multiple linear regression. Results showed that adoption outcomes were associated with a decrease in centralization for the advice network and an increase in centralization for the discussion network, controlling for density. This suggests that community coalitions might consider decreasing their network density in such a manner that distributes power and influence among a broader base of coalition members to seek advice about programs while simultaneously discussing these programs in a more concentrated group to facilitate decisions about which programs to adopt.

[1]  R M Goodman,et al.  Community Coalitions for Prevention and Health Promotion: Factors Predicting Satisfaction, Participation, and Planning , 1996, Health education quarterly.

[2]  Charles Kadushin,et al.  Why It Is So Difficult to Form Effective Community Coalitions , 2005 .

[3]  Mark T. Greenberg,et al.  Social Networks and Community Prevention Coalitions , 2005, Journal of Primary Prevention.

[4]  J. Coleman,et al.  The Diffusion of an Innovation Among Physicians , 1957 .

[5]  Michael W. Arthur,et al.  Promoting science-based prevention in communities. , 2002, Addictive behaviors.

[6]  Thomas W. Valente,et al.  Models and Methods in Social Network Analysis: Network Models and Methods for Studying the Diffusion of Innovations , 2005 .

[7]  R. Zakocs,et al.  What explains community coalition effectiveness?: a review of the literature. , 2006, American journal of preventive medicine.

[8]  Roger V. Gould.  Collective Action and Network Structure , 1993 .

[9]  Jenine K. Harris,et al.  Network Analysis in Public Health: History, Methods, and Applications , 2022 .

[10]  M. Pentz,et al.  Promoting Community Coalition Functioning: Effects of Project STEP , 2008, Prevention Science.

[11]  L. Freeman.  Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification , 1978 .

[12]  G. Marwell,et al.  A Theory of the Critical Mass. I. Interdependence, Group Heterogeneity, and the Production of Collective Action , 1985, American Journal of Sociology.

[13]  Organizational infrastructure and community capacity: The role of broker organizations , 2001 .

[14]  Keith G Provan,et al.  Network Analysis as a Tool for Assessing and Building Community Capacity for Provision of Chronic Disease Services , 2004, Health promotion practice.

[15]  Mark S. Granovetter.  The Strength of Weak Ties , 1973, American Journal of Sociology.

[16]  Thomas W. Valente,et al.  Interorganizational relationships among HIV/AIDS service organizations in Baltimore: A newtwork analysis , 2001, Journal of Urban Health.

[17]  R. Goodman,et al.  Toward a Social Ecology of Community Coalitions , 1996, American journal of health promotion : AJHP.

[18]  Chih-Ping Chou,et al.  Using structural characteristics of community coalitions to predict progress in adopting evidence-based prevention programs , 2005 .

[19]  Helen Harber Singer,et al.  Assessing Interorganizational Networks as a Dimension of Community Capacity: Illustrations From a Community Intervention to Prevent Lead Poisoning , 2004, Health education & behavior : the official publication of the Society for Public Health Education.

[20]  M. Kegler,et al.  Strengthening Community Leadership: Evaluation Findings From the California Healthy Cities and Communities Program , 2008, Health promotion practice.

[21]  M. Pentz.  Form Follows Function: Designs for Prevention Effectiveness and Diffusion Research , 2004, Prevention Science.

[22]  T. Valente,et al.  Community coalitions as a system: effects of network change on adoption of evidence-based substance abuse prevention. , 2007, American journal of public health.

[23]  R. Burt.  Social Contagion and Innovation: Cohesion versus Structural Equivalence , 1987, American Journal of Sociology.

[24]  Martin B. Shaffer.  Coalition work among environmental groups , 2000 .

[25]  M. Kegler,et al.  Factors That Contribute to Effective Community Health Promotion Coalitions: A Study of 10 Project ASSIST Coalitions in North Carolina , 1998, Health education & behavior : the official publication of the Society for Public Health Education.

[26]  K. Provan,et al.  Building Community Capacity Around Chronic Disease Services through a Collaborative Interorganizational Network , 2003, Health education & behavior : the official publication of the Society for Public Health Education.

[27]  R. Goodman,et al.  Identifying and Defining the Dimensions of Community Capacity to Provide a Basis for Measurement , 1998, Health education & behavior : the official publication of the Society for Public Health Education.

[28]  M. Chwe.  Structure and Strategy in Collective Action1 , 1999, American Journal of Sociology.

[29]  M. Pentz.  Evidence-Based Prevention: Characteristics, Impact, and Future Direction , 2003, Journal of psychoactive drugs.

[30]  G. Marwell,et al.  Social Networks and Collective Action: A Theory of the Critical Mass. III , 1988, American Journal of Sociology.

[31]  Hyojoung Kim,et al.  The structure and dynamics of movement participation , 1997 .

[32]  Mark S. Granovetter.  T H E S T R E N G T H O F WEAK TIES: A NETWORK THEORY REVISITED , 1983 .