Effect of counterface roughness on the wear of conventional and crosslinked ultrahigh molecular weight polyethylene studied with a multi-directional motion pin-on-disk device.

The effect of counterface roughness on the wear of conventional gamma-sterilized, and electron-beam-crosslinked ultrahigh molecular weight polyethylene was studied with a circularly translating pin-on-disk device. The counterfaces, CoCr disks, were either polished, or roughened so that they represented the type of roughening and the range of surface roughness values (R(a) = 0.014-0.24 microm) observed in explanted femoral heads of total hip prostheses. The lubricant was diluted calf serum, and the test length 3 million cycles. A total of 24 tests were done. With both types of polyethylene, there was a strong correlation between R(a) and wear factor k. The power equations were k = 5.87 x 10(-5)(R(a))(0.91) for conventional polyethylene (R(2) = 0.94), and k = 7.87 x 10(-5)(R(a))(2.49) for crosslinked polyethylene (R(2) = 0.82). Crosslinking improved wear resistance significantly. The wear of crosslinked polyethylene against the roughest counterfaces was lower than the wear of conventional polyethylene against the polished counterfaces. Against rough counterfaces, the wear of crosslinked polyethylene was an order of magnitude lower than that of conventional polyethylene. On the crosslinked polyethylene pins that were tested against polished counterfaces, remains of original machining marks were still visible after the test. The average size of wear particles produced by both types of polyethylene against rough counterfaces was similar, 0.4 microm, whereas that produced by conventional and crosslinked polyethylene against polished counterfaces was significantly smaller, 0.2 and 0.1 microm, respectively.

[1]  L. Lee.  Polymer Wear and Its Control , 1985 .

[2]  D. Dowson,et al.  Influence of Counterface Topography on the Wear of Ultra High Molecular Weight Polyethylene Under Wet or Dry Conditions , 1985 .

[3]  B. Weightman,et al.  The effect of the surface finish of alumina and stainless steel on the wear rate of UHMW polyethylene. , 1986, Biomaterials.

[4]  D. Dowson,et al.  A tribological study of retrieved hip prostheses. , 1992, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[5]  E. Tsuji,et al.  Improvement of polyethylene by irradiation in artificial joints , 1992 .

[6]  A Unsworth,et al.  Wear in Retrieved Charnley Acetabular Sockets , 1996, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine.

[7]  Effect of Counterface Material on the Characteristics of Retrieved Uncemented Cobalt-Chromium and Titanium Alloy Total Hip Replacements , 1996, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine.

[8]  J Fisher,et al.  Ultra-High Molecular Weight Polyethylene Wear Debris Generated in Vivo and in Laboratory Tests; the Influence of Counterface Roughness , 1996, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine.

[9]  D. Dowson,et al.  The wear of ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene sliding on metallic and ceramic counterfaces representative of current femoral surfaces in joint replacement , 1997, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine.

[10]  A Unsworth,et al.  The effect of surface topography of retrieved femoral heads on the wear of UHMWPE sockets. , 1997, Medical engineering & physics.

[11]  M. Freeman,et al.  The size and shape of particulate polyethylene wear debris in total joint replacements , 1997, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine.

[12]  V. Saikko,et al.  A multidirectional motion pin-on-disk wear test method for prosthetic joint materials. , 1998, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[13]  J H Dumbleton,et al.  Effect of femoral head surface roughness on the wear of ultrahigh molecular weight polyethylene acetabular cups. , 1998, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[14]  A. Edidin,et al.  Advances in the processing, sterilization, and crosslinking of ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene for total joint arthroplasty. , 1999, Biomaterials.

[15]  D. McNulty,et al.  Analysis of prosthetic femoral heads retrieved at autopsy. , 1999, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[16]  F. Shen,et al.  Wear of gamma-crosslinked polyethylene acetabular cups against roughened femoral balls. , 1999, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[17]  V. Saikko,et al.  Wear simulation of UHMWPE for total hip replacement with a multidirectional motion pin-on-disk device: effects of counterface material, contact area, and lubricant. , 2000, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[18]  A Unsworth,et al.  Variation in the wear rate during the life of a total hip arthroplasty: a simulator and retrieval study. , 2000, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[19]  J. Fisher,et al.  Biological reactions to wear debris in total joint replacement , 2000, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine.

[20]  V. Saikko,et al.  Wear simulation of total hip prostheses with polyethylene against CoCr, alumina and diamond-like carbon. , 2001, Biomaterials.